Cargando…

The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Clinical guideline recommendations for addressing modifiable risk factors are not routinely implemented into preconception and antenatal care. This review assessed the effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving health professional provision of preconception and antenatal car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doherty, Emma, Kingsland, Melanie, Wiggers, John, Wolfenden, Luke, Hall, Alix, McCrabb, Sam, Tremain, Danika, Hollis, Jenna, Licata, Milly, Wynne, Olivia, Dilworth, Sophie, Daly, Justine B., Tully, Belinda, Dray, Julia, Bailey, Kylie A., Elliott, Elizabeth J., Hodder, Rebecca K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00368-1
_version_ 1784834938215858176
author Doherty, Emma
Kingsland, Melanie
Wiggers, John
Wolfenden, Luke
Hall, Alix
McCrabb, Sam
Tremain, Danika
Hollis, Jenna
Licata, Milly
Wynne, Olivia
Dilworth, Sophie
Daly, Justine B.
Tully, Belinda
Dray, Julia
Bailey, Kylie A.
Elliott, Elizabeth J.
Hodder, Rebecca K.
author_facet Doherty, Emma
Kingsland, Melanie
Wiggers, John
Wolfenden, Luke
Hall, Alix
McCrabb, Sam
Tremain, Danika
Hollis, Jenna
Licata, Milly
Wynne, Olivia
Dilworth, Sophie
Daly, Justine B.
Tully, Belinda
Dray, Julia
Bailey, Kylie A.
Elliott, Elizabeth J.
Hodder, Rebecca K.
author_sort Doherty, Emma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical guideline recommendations for addressing modifiable risk factors are not routinely implemented into preconception and antenatal care. This review assessed the effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving health professional provision of preconception and antenatal care addressing tobacco smoking, weight management and alcohol consumption. METHODS: A systematic review of randomised and non-randomised studies with a parallel comparison group was conducted. Eligible studies used implementation strategy/ies targeted at health professionals to improve at least one element of preconception and/or antenatal care (smoking: ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange; weight/alcohol: assess, advise, refer) compared to usual practice/control or alternative strategies. Eligible studies were identified via CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Maternity and Infant Care, CINAHL and other sources. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted where appropriate, with other findings summarised using the direction of effect. The certainty of the pooled evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in the review. Thirteen were in the antenatal period and 12 tested multiple implementation strategies (median: three). Meta-analyses of RCTs found that implementation strategies compared to usual practice/control probably increase asking (OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.13, 5.59; 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and advising (OR: 4.32; 95% CI: 3.06, 6.11; 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) about smoking and assessing weight gain (OR: 57.56; 95% CI: 41.78, 79.29; 2 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), and may increase assessing (OR: 2.55; 95% CI: 0.24, 27.06; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence), assisting (OR: 6.34; 95% CI: 1.51, 26.63; 3 studies; low-certainty evidence) and arranging support (OR: 3.55; 95% CI: 0.50, 25.34; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence) for smoking. The true effect of implementation strategies in increasing advice about weight gain (OR: 3.37; 95% CI: 2.34, 4.84; 2 non-randomised studies; very low-certainty evidence) and alcohol consumption (OR: 10.36; 95% CI: 2.37, 41.20; 2 non-randomised studies; very low-certainty evidence) is uncertain due to the quality of evidence to date. CONCLUSIONS: Review findings provide some evidence to support the effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving health professional delivery of antenatal care addressing smoking and weight management. Rigorous research is needed to build certainty in the evidence for improving alcohol and weight gain advice, and in preconception care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO-CRD42019131691. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00368-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9682815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96828152022-11-24 The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review Doherty, Emma Kingsland, Melanie Wiggers, John Wolfenden, Luke Hall, Alix McCrabb, Sam Tremain, Danika Hollis, Jenna Licata, Milly Wynne, Olivia Dilworth, Sophie Daly, Justine B. Tully, Belinda Dray, Julia Bailey, Kylie A. Elliott, Elizabeth J. Hodder, Rebecca K. Implement Sci Commun Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Clinical guideline recommendations for addressing modifiable risk factors are not routinely implemented into preconception and antenatal care. This review assessed the effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving health professional provision of preconception and antenatal care addressing tobacco smoking, weight management and alcohol consumption. METHODS: A systematic review of randomised and non-randomised studies with a parallel comparison group was conducted. Eligible studies used implementation strategy/ies targeted at health professionals to improve at least one element of preconception and/or antenatal care (smoking: ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange; weight/alcohol: assess, advise, refer) compared to usual practice/control or alternative strategies. Eligible studies were identified via CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Maternity and Infant Care, CINAHL and other sources. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted where appropriate, with other findings summarised using the direction of effect. The certainty of the pooled evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in the review. Thirteen were in the antenatal period and 12 tested multiple implementation strategies (median: three). Meta-analyses of RCTs found that implementation strategies compared to usual practice/control probably increase asking (OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.13, 5.59; 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and advising (OR: 4.32; 95% CI: 3.06, 6.11; 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) about smoking and assessing weight gain (OR: 57.56; 95% CI: 41.78, 79.29; 2 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), and may increase assessing (OR: 2.55; 95% CI: 0.24, 27.06; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence), assisting (OR: 6.34; 95% CI: 1.51, 26.63; 3 studies; low-certainty evidence) and arranging support (OR: 3.55; 95% CI: 0.50, 25.34; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence) for smoking. The true effect of implementation strategies in increasing advice about weight gain (OR: 3.37; 95% CI: 2.34, 4.84; 2 non-randomised studies; very low-certainty evidence) and alcohol consumption (OR: 10.36; 95% CI: 2.37, 41.20; 2 non-randomised studies; very low-certainty evidence) is uncertain due to the quality of evidence to date. CONCLUSIONS: Review findings provide some evidence to support the effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving health professional delivery of antenatal care addressing smoking and weight management. Rigorous research is needed to build certainty in the evidence for improving alcohol and weight gain advice, and in preconception care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO-CRD42019131691. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00368-1. BioMed Central 2022-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9682815/ /pubmed/36419177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00368-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Doherty, Emma
Kingsland, Melanie
Wiggers, John
Wolfenden, Luke
Hall, Alix
McCrabb, Sam
Tremain, Danika
Hollis, Jenna
Licata, Milly
Wynne, Olivia
Dilworth, Sophie
Daly, Justine B.
Tully, Belinda
Dray, Julia
Bailey, Kylie A.
Elliott, Elizabeth J.
Hodder, Rebecca K.
The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review
title The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review
title_full The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review
title_fullStr The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review
title_short The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review
title_sort effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00368-1
work_keys_str_mv AT dohertyemma theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT kingslandmelanie theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT wiggersjohn theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT wolfendenluke theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT hallalix theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT mccrabbsam theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT tremaindanika theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT hollisjenna theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT licatamilly theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT wynneolivia theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT dilworthsophie theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT dalyjustineb theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT tullybelinda theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT drayjulia theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT baileykyliea theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT elliottelizabethj theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT hodderrebeccak theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT dohertyemma effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT kingslandmelanie effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT wiggersjohn effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT wolfendenluke effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT hallalix effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT mccrabbsam effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT tremaindanika effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT hollisjenna effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT licatamilly effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT wynneolivia effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT dilworthsophie effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT dalyjustineb effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT tullybelinda effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT drayjulia effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT baileykyliea effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT elliottelizabethj effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview
AT hodderrebeccak effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview