Cargando…
The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Clinical guideline recommendations for addressing modifiable risk factors are not routinely implemented into preconception and antenatal care. This review assessed the effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving health professional provision of preconception and antenatal car...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00368-1 |
_version_ | 1784834938215858176 |
---|---|
author | Doherty, Emma Kingsland, Melanie Wiggers, John Wolfenden, Luke Hall, Alix McCrabb, Sam Tremain, Danika Hollis, Jenna Licata, Milly Wynne, Olivia Dilworth, Sophie Daly, Justine B. Tully, Belinda Dray, Julia Bailey, Kylie A. Elliott, Elizabeth J. Hodder, Rebecca K. |
author_facet | Doherty, Emma Kingsland, Melanie Wiggers, John Wolfenden, Luke Hall, Alix McCrabb, Sam Tremain, Danika Hollis, Jenna Licata, Milly Wynne, Olivia Dilworth, Sophie Daly, Justine B. Tully, Belinda Dray, Julia Bailey, Kylie A. Elliott, Elizabeth J. Hodder, Rebecca K. |
author_sort | Doherty, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical guideline recommendations for addressing modifiable risk factors are not routinely implemented into preconception and antenatal care. This review assessed the effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving health professional provision of preconception and antenatal care addressing tobacco smoking, weight management and alcohol consumption. METHODS: A systematic review of randomised and non-randomised studies with a parallel comparison group was conducted. Eligible studies used implementation strategy/ies targeted at health professionals to improve at least one element of preconception and/or antenatal care (smoking: ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange; weight/alcohol: assess, advise, refer) compared to usual practice/control or alternative strategies. Eligible studies were identified via CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Maternity and Infant Care, CINAHL and other sources. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted where appropriate, with other findings summarised using the direction of effect. The certainty of the pooled evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in the review. Thirteen were in the antenatal period and 12 tested multiple implementation strategies (median: three). Meta-analyses of RCTs found that implementation strategies compared to usual practice/control probably increase asking (OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.13, 5.59; 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and advising (OR: 4.32; 95% CI: 3.06, 6.11; 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) about smoking and assessing weight gain (OR: 57.56; 95% CI: 41.78, 79.29; 2 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), and may increase assessing (OR: 2.55; 95% CI: 0.24, 27.06; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence), assisting (OR: 6.34; 95% CI: 1.51, 26.63; 3 studies; low-certainty evidence) and arranging support (OR: 3.55; 95% CI: 0.50, 25.34; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence) for smoking. The true effect of implementation strategies in increasing advice about weight gain (OR: 3.37; 95% CI: 2.34, 4.84; 2 non-randomised studies; very low-certainty evidence) and alcohol consumption (OR: 10.36; 95% CI: 2.37, 41.20; 2 non-randomised studies; very low-certainty evidence) is uncertain due to the quality of evidence to date. CONCLUSIONS: Review findings provide some evidence to support the effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving health professional delivery of antenatal care addressing smoking and weight management. Rigorous research is needed to build certainty in the evidence for improving alcohol and weight gain advice, and in preconception care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO-CRD42019131691. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00368-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9682815 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96828152022-11-24 The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review Doherty, Emma Kingsland, Melanie Wiggers, John Wolfenden, Luke Hall, Alix McCrabb, Sam Tremain, Danika Hollis, Jenna Licata, Milly Wynne, Olivia Dilworth, Sophie Daly, Justine B. Tully, Belinda Dray, Julia Bailey, Kylie A. Elliott, Elizabeth J. Hodder, Rebecca K. Implement Sci Commun Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Clinical guideline recommendations for addressing modifiable risk factors are not routinely implemented into preconception and antenatal care. This review assessed the effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving health professional provision of preconception and antenatal care addressing tobacco smoking, weight management and alcohol consumption. METHODS: A systematic review of randomised and non-randomised studies with a parallel comparison group was conducted. Eligible studies used implementation strategy/ies targeted at health professionals to improve at least one element of preconception and/or antenatal care (smoking: ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange; weight/alcohol: assess, advise, refer) compared to usual practice/control or alternative strategies. Eligible studies were identified via CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Maternity and Infant Care, CINAHL and other sources. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted where appropriate, with other findings summarised using the direction of effect. The certainty of the pooled evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in the review. Thirteen were in the antenatal period and 12 tested multiple implementation strategies (median: three). Meta-analyses of RCTs found that implementation strategies compared to usual practice/control probably increase asking (OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.13, 5.59; 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and advising (OR: 4.32; 95% CI: 3.06, 6.11; 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) about smoking and assessing weight gain (OR: 57.56; 95% CI: 41.78, 79.29; 2 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), and may increase assessing (OR: 2.55; 95% CI: 0.24, 27.06; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence), assisting (OR: 6.34; 95% CI: 1.51, 26.63; 3 studies; low-certainty evidence) and arranging support (OR: 3.55; 95% CI: 0.50, 25.34; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence) for smoking. The true effect of implementation strategies in increasing advice about weight gain (OR: 3.37; 95% CI: 2.34, 4.84; 2 non-randomised studies; very low-certainty evidence) and alcohol consumption (OR: 10.36; 95% CI: 2.37, 41.20; 2 non-randomised studies; very low-certainty evidence) is uncertain due to the quality of evidence to date. CONCLUSIONS: Review findings provide some evidence to support the effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving health professional delivery of antenatal care addressing smoking and weight management. Rigorous research is needed to build certainty in the evidence for improving alcohol and weight gain advice, and in preconception care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO-CRD42019131691. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00368-1. BioMed Central 2022-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9682815/ /pubmed/36419177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00368-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Doherty, Emma Kingsland, Melanie Wiggers, John Wolfenden, Luke Hall, Alix McCrabb, Sam Tremain, Danika Hollis, Jenna Licata, Milly Wynne, Olivia Dilworth, Sophie Daly, Justine B. Tully, Belinda Dray, Julia Bailey, Kylie A. Elliott, Elizabeth J. Hodder, Rebecca K. The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review |
title | The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review |
title_full | The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review |
title_short | The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review |
title_sort | effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00368-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dohertyemma theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT kingslandmelanie theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT wiggersjohn theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT wolfendenluke theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT hallalix theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT mccrabbsam theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT tremaindanika theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT hollisjenna theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT licatamilly theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT wynneolivia theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT dilworthsophie theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT dalyjustineb theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT tullybelinda theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT drayjulia theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT baileykyliea theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT elliottelizabethj theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT hodderrebeccak theeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT dohertyemma effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT kingslandmelanie effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT wiggersjohn effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT wolfendenluke effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT hallalix effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT mccrabbsam effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT tremaindanika effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT hollisjenna effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT licatamilly effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT wynneolivia effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT dilworthsophie effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT dalyjustineb effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT tullybelinda effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT drayjulia effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT baileykyliea effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT elliottelizabethj effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview AT hodderrebeccak effectivenessofimplementationstrategiesinimprovingpreconceptionandantenatalpreventivecareasystematicreview |