Cargando…

Comparison Between Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula as Postextubation Respiratory Support in Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE: The interest in noninvasive respiratory support has been increasing, including continuous positive airway pressure and recent respiratory methods, namely high-flow nasal cannula. It is discussed if high-flow nasal cannula can reduce continuous positive airway pressure or invasive ventilat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martins, Catarina, Pissarra, Rita, Costa, Sandra, Soares, Henrique, Guimarães, Hercília
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Pediatrics Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36314953
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2022.22161
_version_ 1784834949332860928
author Martins, Catarina
Pissarra, Rita
Costa, Sandra
Soares, Henrique
Guimarães, Hercília
author_facet Martins, Catarina
Pissarra, Rita
Costa, Sandra
Soares, Henrique
Guimarães, Hercília
author_sort Martins, Catarina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The interest in noninvasive respiratory support has been increasing, including continuous positive airway pressure and recent respiratory methods, namely high-flow nasal cannula. It is discussed if high-flow nasal cannula can reduce continuous positive airway pressure or invasive ventilation use. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare continuous positive airway pressure and high-flow nasal cannula as postextubation respiratory support in neonates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search, based on Preferred Reporting of Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, was conducted across MEDLINE (through PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science in 15 years (2006-2021) assessing randomized controlled trials that compared continuous positive airway pressure with high-flow nasal cannula as postextubation interventions in neonates. The primary outcome was extubation failure at 72 hours and/or at 7 days and the secondary outcomes included air leak syndrome, pneumothorax, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, nasal trauma, abdominal distension, and mortality. RESULTS: Seven studies were included, comprising 1044 neonates. No statistically significant differences were found between high-flow nasal cannula and continuous positive airway pressure in extubation failure (at 72 hours and 7 days), air leak syndrome, pneumothorax, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, abdominal distension, and mortality. High-flow nasal cannula was associated with a lower incidence of nasal trauma (odds ratio = 0.21; 95% CI 0.08-0.52; P = .0008). Studies assessing extreme premature infants (<28 weeks) raised some efficacy and safety concerns. CONCLUSION: High-flow nasal cannula may be as effective and safe as continuous positive airway pressure, with similar extubation failure and risk of air leak syndrome, pneumothorax, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, abdominal distension, and mortality with the advantage of less nasal trauma. High-flow nasal cannula should be considered as an alternative to continuous positive airway pressure in postextubation settings in neonates. Further studies are needed to establish efficacy and safety in lower gestational ages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9682860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Turkish Pediatrics Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96828602022-12-02 Comparison Between Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula as Postextubation Respiratory Support in Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Martins, Catarina Pissarra, Rita Costa, Sandra Soares, Henrique Guimarães, Hercília Turk Arch Pediatr Review OBJECTIVE: The interest in noninvasive respiratory support has been increasing, including continuous positive airway pressure and recent respiratory methods, namely high-flow nasal cannula. It is discussed if high-flow nasal cannula can reduce continuous positive airway pressure or invasive ventilation use. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare continuous positive airway pressure and high-flow nasal cannula as postextubation respiratory support in neonates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search, based on Preferred Reporting of Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, was conducted across MEDLINE (through PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science in 15 years (2006-2021) assessing randomized controlled trials that compared continuous positive airway pressure with high-flow nasal cannula as postextubation interventions in neonates. The primary outcome was extubation failure at 72 hours and/or at 7 days and the secondary outcomes included air leak syndrome, pneumothorax, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, nasal trauma, abdominal distension, and mortality. RESULTS: Seven studies were included, comprising 1044 neonates. No statistically significant differences were found between high-flow nasal cannula and continuous positive airway pressure in extubation failure (at 72 hours and 7 days), air leak syndrome, pneumothorax, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, abdominal distension, and mortality. High-flow nasal cannula was associated with a lower incidence of nasal trauma (odds ratio = 0.21; 95% CI 0.08-0.52; P = .0008). Studies assessing extreme premature infants (<28 weeks) raised some efficacy and safety concerns. CONCLUSION: High-flow nasal cannula may be as effective and safe as continuous positive airway pressure, with similar extubation failure and risk of air leak syndrome, pneumothorax, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, abdominal distension, and mortality with the advantage of less nasal trauma. High-flow nasal cannula should be considered as an alternative to continuous positive airway pressure in postextubation settings in neonates. Further studies are needed to establish efficacy and safety in lower gestational ages. Turkish Pediatrics Association 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9682860/ /pubmed/36314953 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2022.22161 Text en © Copyright 2022 by The Turkish Archives of Pediatrics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Review
Martins, Catarina
Pissarra, Rita
Costa, Sandra
Soares, Henrique
Guimarães, Hercília
Comparison Between Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula as Postextubation Respiratory Support in Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Comparison Between Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula as Postextubation Respiratory Support in Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparison Between Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula as Postextubation Respiratory Support in Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison Between Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula as Postextubation Respiratory Support in Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula as Postextubation Respiratory Support in Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparison Between Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula as Postextubation Respiratory Support in Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison between continuous positive airway pressure and high-flow nasal cannula as postextubation respiratory support in neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36314953
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2022.22161
work_keys_str_mv AT martinscatarina comparisonbetweencontinuouspositiveairwaypressureandhighflownasalcannulaaspostextubationrespiratorysupportinneonatesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pissarrarita comparisonbetweencontinuouspositiveairwaypressureandhighflownasalcannulaaspostextubationrespiratorysupportinneonatesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT costasandra comparisonbetweencontinuouspositiveairwaypressureandhighflownasalcannulaaspostextubationrespiratorysupportinneonatesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT soareshenrique comparisonbetweencontinuouspositiveairwaypressureandhighflownasalcannulaaspostextubationrespiratorysupportinneonatesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guimaraeshercilia comparisonbetweencontinuouspositiveairwaypressureandhighflownasalcannulaaspostextubationrespiratorysupportinneonatesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis