Cargando…
A Comparative Evaluation of 2 Videolaryngoscopes as an Intubation Aid in a Simulated Difficult Airway: A Prospective Randomised Study
OBJECTIVE: Several videolaryngoscopes have been developed for using in difficult airway. We conducted this study to evaluate the performance of McGrath(®) MAC and King Vision(®) videolaryngoscopes in a simulated difficult airway. METHODS: This prospective, randomised, comparative study was conducted...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Turkish Society of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36301282 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2022.21285 |
_version_ | 1784834968151654400 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, Ajay Taluja, Anupma Saxena, Bhavna Dwivedi, Puneet |
author_facet | Kumar, Ajay Taluja, Anupma Saxena, Bhavna Dwivedi, Puneet |
author_sort | Kumar, Ajay |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Several videolaryngoscopes have been developed for using in difficult airway. We conducted this study to evaluate the performance of McGrath(®) MAC and King Vision(®) videolaryngoscopes in a simulated difficult airway. METHODS: This prospective, randomised, comparative study was conducted in 140 surgical patients. Anaesthesia was administered as per standard protocol. A cervical collar was applied to simulate a difficult airway. Patients were randomised into 2 groups. In group M (n = 70), laryngoscopy was performed first with King Vision(®) videolaryngoscope and second time with McGrath(®) MAC videolaryngoscope and trachea was intubated using the second device, while in group K (n = 70), laryngoscopy was performed first with McGrath(®) MAC videolaryngoscope and second time with King Vision(®) videolaryngoscope and trachea was intubated using the second device. The laryngeal view, time taken for optimal laryngeal view, number of intubation attempts, ease of intubation, first attempt intubation success, time to tracheal intubation, haemodynamic parameters, and complications such as airway trauma, if any, were noted. RESULTS: Tracheal intubation was faster with McGrath(®) MAC (34.89 ± 3.7 seconds) compared to King Vision(®) videolaryngoscope (43.43 ± 4.3 seconds, P < .001) with comparable first attempt intubation success by 100% vs 97.1%, P = .496, respectively. The laryngeal view obtained with both the devices was comparable but the mean time taken for optimal laryngeal view was significantly longer with King Vision(®) videolaryngoscope, both in group M (P < .001) and group K (P < .001). Ease of intubation and complications were comparable in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: McGrath(®) MAC videolaryngoscope in comparison to King Vision(®) videolaryngoscope resulted in a shorter time taken for optimal laryngeal view and time to tracheal intubation with comparable first attempt intubation success. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9682938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Turkish Society of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96829382022-12-02 A Comparative Evaluation of 2 Videolaryngoscopes as an Intubation Aid in a Simulated Difficult Airway: A Prospective Randomised Study Kumar, Ajay Taluja, Anupma Saxena, Bhavna Dwivedi, Puneet Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim Original Article OBJECTIVE: Several videolaryngoscopes have been developed for using in difficult airway. We conducted this study to evaluate the performance of McGrath(®) MAC and King Vision(®) videolaryngoscopes in a simulated difficult airway. METHODS: This prospective, randomised, comparative study was conducted in 140 surgical patients. Anaesthesia was administered as per standard protocol. A cervical collar was applied to simulate a difficult airway. Patients were randomised into 2 groups. In group M (n = 70), laryngoscopy was performed first with King Vision(®) videolaryngoscope and second time with McGrath(®) MAC videolaryngoscope and trachea was intubated using the second device, while in group K (n = 70), laryngoscopy was performed first with McGrath(®) MAC videolaryngoscope and second time with King Vision(®) videolaryngoscope and trachea was intubated using the second device. The laryngeal view, time taken for optimal laryngeal view, number of intubation attempts, ease of intubation, first attempt intubation success, time to tracheal intubation, haemodynamic parameters, and complications such as airway trauma, if any, were noted. RESULTS: Tracheal intubation was faster with McGrath(®) MAC (34.89 ± 3.7 seconds) compared to King Vision(®) videolaryngoscope (43.43 ± 4.3 seconds, P < .001) with comparable first attempt intubation success by 100% vs 97.1%, P = .496, respectively. The laryngeal view obtained with both the devices was comparable but the mean time taken for optimal laryngeal view was significantly longer with King Vision(®) videolaryngoscope, both in group M (P < .001) and group K (P < .001). Ease of intubation and complications were comparable in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: McGrath(®) MAC videolaryngoscope in comparison to King Vision(®) videolaryngoscope resulted in a shorter time taken for optimal laryngeal view and time to tracheal intubation with comparable first attempt intubation success. Turkish Society of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9682938/ /pubmed/36301282 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2022.21285 Text en © Copyright 2022 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kumar, Ajay Taluja, Anupma Saxena, Bhavna Dwivedi, Puneet A Comparative Evaluation of 2 Videolaryngoscopes as an Intubation Aid in a Simulated Difficult Airway: A Prospective Randomised Study |
title | A Comparative Evaluation of 2 Videolaryngoscopes as an Intubation Aid in a Simulated Difficult Airway: A Prospective Randomised Study |
title_full | A Comparative Evaluation of 2 Videolaryngoscopes as an Intubation Aid in a Simulated Difficult Airway: A Prospective Randomised Study |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Evaluation of 2 Videolaryngoscopes as an Intubation Aid in a Simulated Difficult Airway: A Prospective Randomised Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Evaluation of 2 Videolaryngoscopes as an Intubation Aid in a Simulated Difficult Airway: A Prospective Randomised Study |
title_short | A Comparative Evaluation of 2 Videolaryngoscopes as an Intubation Aid in a Simulated Difficult Airway: A Prospective Randomised Study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of 2 videolaryngoscopes as an intubation aid in a simulated difficult airway: a prospective randomised study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36301282 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2022.21285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumarajay acomparativeevaluationof2videolaryngoscopesasanintubationaidinasimulateddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT talujaanupma acomparativeevaluationof2videolaryngoscopesasanintubationaidinasimulateddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT saxenabhavna acomparativeevaluationof2videolaryngoscopesasanintubationaidinasimulateddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT dwivedipuneet acomparativeevaluationof2videolaryngoscopesasanintubationaidinasimulateddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT kumarajay comparativeevaluationof2videolaryngoscopesasanintubationaidinasimulateddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT talujaanupma comparativeevaluationof2videolaryngoscopesasanintubationaidinasimulateddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT saxenabhavna comparativeevaluationof2videolaryngoscopesasanintubationaidinasimulateddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT dwivedipuneet comparativeevaluationof2videolaryngoscopesasanintubationaidinasimulateddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomisedstudy |