Cargando…

Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10

OBJECTIVE: The 10-item Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery 10 scale is a validated patient-reported outcome questionnaire that measures the quality of recovery following delivery. This study aims to develop a Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10 to evaluate its validity, reliability, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kozanhan, Betül, Yıldız, Munise, Polat, Ayşenur, Günenç, Oğuzhan, Mahmut Tutar, Sami, Sinan İyisoy, Mehmet, Gözde Kulhan, Nur, Sultan, Pervez
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Society of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36301286
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2022.21441
_version_ 1784834969836716032
author Kozanhan, Betül
Yıldız, Munise
Polat, Ayşenur
Günenç, Oğuzhan
Mahmut Tutar, Sami
Sinan İyisoy, Mehmet
Gözde Kulhan, Nur
Sultan, Pervez
author_facet Kozanhan, Betül
Yıldız, Munise
Polat, Ayşenur
Günenç, Oğuzhan
Mahmut Tutar, Sami
Sinan İyisoy, Mehmet
Gözde Kulhan, Nur
Sultan, Pervez
author_sort Kozanhan, Betül
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The 10-item Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery 10 scale is a validated patient-reported outcome questionnaire that measures the quality of recovery following delivery. This study aims to develop a Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10 to evaluate its validity, reliability, and clinical feasibility. METHODS: Term parturients who underwent vaginal delivery or elective caesarean delivery were asked to complete a Turkish version of Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery 10 scoring tool and EuroQol 5-dimension 3L scores (including a global health visual analogue scale) 24 hours after delivery. To validate the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish, we assessed validity, reliability, and clinical feasibility and compared it with the EQ-5D-3L questionnaires. RESULTS: One hundred parturients completed the questionnaire in 24 hours (100% response rate). Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish correlated highly with EQ-5D-3L score (r = -0.611) and global health visual analogue scale score (r = 0.652) at 24 hours and discriminated well between good versus poor recovery (global health visual analogue scale score ≥70 vs <70; median interquartile range were 86 [80-90] and 68 [59-75] (P < .001), respectively). Scores were similar for caesarean and vaginal deliveries, 83 (76-89) and 82.5 (69-90), respectively (P = .5). Twenty-four-hour Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish scores did not correlate with any baseline demographic and clinical data parameters. Internal consistency was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87 and inter-item correlation = 0.41), and split-half reliability was very good (Spearman-Brown prophesy reliability estimate = 0.86). Test-retest reliability was excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.99). No floor or ceiling effects were demonstrated. CONCLUSION: The Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish is a valid, reliable, and clinically feasible measure of inpatient postpartum recovery following caesarean and vaginal delivery modes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9682945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Turkish Society of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96829452022-12-02 Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 Kozanhan, Betül Yıldız, Munise Polat, Ayşenur Günenç, Oğuzhan Mahmut Tutar, Sami Sinan İyisoy, Mehmet Gözde Kulhan, Nur Sultan, Pervez Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim Original Article OBJECTIVE: The 10-item Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery 10 scale is a validated patient-reported outcome questionnaire that measures the quality of recovery following delivery. This study aims to develop a Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10 to evaluate its validity, reliability, and clinical feasibility. METHODS: Term parturients who underwent vaginal delivery or elective caesarean delivery were asked to complete a Turkish version of Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery 10 scoring tool and EuroQol 5-dimension 3L scores (including a global health visual analogue scale) 24 hours after delivery. To validate the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish, we assessed validity, reliability, and clinical feasibility and compared it with the EQ-5D-3L questionnaires. RESULTS: One hundred parturients completed the questionnaire in 24 hours (100% response rate). Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish correlated highly with EQ-5D-3L score (r = -0.611) and global health visual analogue scale score (r = 0.652) at 24 hours and discriminated well between good versus poor recovery (global health visual analogue scale score ≥70 vs <70; median interquartile range were 86 [80-90] and 68 [59-75] (P < .001), respectively). Scores were similar for caesarean and vaginal deliveries, 83 (76-89) and 82.5 (69-90), respectively (P = .5). Twenty-four-hour Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish scores did not correlate with any baseline demographic and clinical data parameters. Internal consistency was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87 and inter-item correlation = 0.41), and split-half reliability was very good (Spearman-Brown prophesy reliability estimate = 0.86). Test-retest reliability was excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.99). No floor or ceiling effects were demonstrated. CONCLUSION: The Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish is a valid, reliable, and clinically feasible measure of inpatient postpartum recovery following caesarean and vaginal delivery modes. Turkish Society of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9682945/ /pubmed/36301286 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2022.21441 Text en © Copyright 2022 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Kozanhan, Betül
Yıldız, Munise
Polat, Ayşenur
Günenç, Oğuzhan
Mahmut Tutar, Sami
Sinan İyisoy, Mehmet
Gözde Kulhan, Nur
Sultan, Pervez
Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10
title Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10
title_full Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10
title_fullStr Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10
title_short Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10
title_sort development and validation of a turkish version of obstetric quality of recovery-10
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36301286
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2022.21441
work_keys_str_mv AT kozanhanbetul developmentandvalidationofaturkishversionofobstetricqualityofrecovery10
AT yıldızmunise developmentandvalidationofaturkishversionofobstetricqualityofrecovery10
AT polataysenur developmentandvalidationofaturkishversionofobstetricqualityofrecovery10
AT gunencoguzhan developmentandvalidationofaturkishversionofobstetricqualityofrecovery10
AT mahmuttutarsami developmentandvalidationofaturkishversionofobstetricqualityofrecovery10
AT sinaniyisoymehmet developmentandvalidationofaturkishversionofobstetricqualityofrecovery10
AT gozdekulhannur developmentandvalidationofaturkishversionofobstetricqualityofrecovery10
AT sultanpervez developmentandvalidationofaturkishversionofobstetricqualityofrecovery10