Cargando…
Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10
OBJECTIVE: The 10-item Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery 10 scale is a validated patient-reported outcome questionnaire that measures the quality of recovery following delivery. This study aims to develop a Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10 to evaluate its validity, reliability, an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Turkish Society of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36301286 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2022.21441 |
_version_ | 1784834969836716032 |
---|---|
author | Kozanhan, Betül Yıldız, Munise Polat, Ayşenur Günenç, Oğuzhan Mahmut Tutar, Sami Sinan İyisoy, Mehmet Gözde Kulhan, Nur Sultan, Pervez |
author_facet | Kozanhan, Betül Yıldız, Munise Polat, Ayşenur Günenç, Oğuzhan Mahmut Tutar, Sami Sinan İyisoy, Mehmet Gözde Kulhan, Nur Sultan, Pervez |
author_sort | Kozanhan, Betül |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The 10-item Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery 10 scale is a validated patient-reported outcome questionnaire that measures the quality of recovery following delivery. This study aims to develop a Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10 to evaluate its validity, reliability, and clinical feasibility. METHODS: Term parturients who underwent vaginal delivery or elective caesarean delivery were asked to complete a Turkish version of Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery 10 scoring tool and EuroQol 5-dimension 3L scores (including a global health visual analogue scale) 24 hours after delivery. To validate the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish, we assessed validity, reliability, and clinical feasibility and compared it with the EQ-5D-3L questionnaires. RESULTS: One hundred parturients completed the questionnaire in 24 hours (100% response rate). Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish correlated highly with EQ-5D-3L score (r = -0.611) and global health visual analogue scale score (r = 0.652) at 24 hours and discriminated well between good versus poor recovery (global health visual analogue scale score ≥70 vs <70; median interquartile range were 86 [80-90] and 68 [59-75] (P < .001), respectively). Scores were similar for caesarean and vaginal deliveries, 83 (76-89) and 82.5 (69-90), respectively (P = .5). Twenty-four-hour Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish scores did not correlate with any baseline demographic and clinical data parameters. Internal consistency was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87 and inter-item correlation = 0.41), and split-half reliability was very good (Spearman-Brown prophesy reliability estimate = 0.86). Test-retest reliability was excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.99). No floor or ceiling effects were demonstrated. CONCLUSION: The Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish is a valid, reliable, and clinically feasible measure of inpatient postpartum recovery following caesarean and vaginal delivery modes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9682945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Turkish Society of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96829452022-12-02 Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 Kozanhan, Betül Yıldız, Munise Polat, Ayşenur Günenç, Oğuzhan Mahmut Tutar, Sami Sinan İyisoy, Mehmet Gözde Kulhan, Nur Sultan, Pervez Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim Original Article OBJECTIVE: The 10-item Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery 10 scale is a validated patient-reported outcome questionnaire that measures the quality of recovery following delivery. This study aims to develop a Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10 to evaluate its validity, reliability, and clinical feasibility. METHODS: Term parturients who underwent vaginal delivery or elective caesarean delivery were asked to complete a Turkish version of Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery 10 scoring tool and EuroQol 5-dimension 3L scores (including a global health visual analogue scale) 24 hours after delivery. To validate the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish, we assessed validity, reliability, and clinical feasibility and compared it with the EQ-5D-3L questionnaires. RESULTS: One hundred parturients completed the questionnaire in 24 hours (100% response rate). Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish correlated highly with EQ-5D-3L score (r = -0.611) and global health visual analogue scale score (r = 0.652) at 24 hours and discriminated well between good versus poor recovery (global health visual analogue scale score ≥70 vs <70; median interquartile range were 86 [80-90] and 68 [59-75] (P < .001), respectively). Scores were similar for caesarean and vaginal deliveries, 83 (76-89) and 82.5 (69-90), respectively (P = .5). Twenty-four-hour Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish scores did not correlate with any baseline demographic and clinical data parameters. Internal consistency was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87 and inter-item correlation = 0.41), and split-half reliability was very good (Spearman-Brown prophesy reliability estimate = 0.86). Test-retest reliability was excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.99). No floor or ceiling effects were demonstrated. CONCLUSION: The Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish is a valid, reliable, and clinically feasible measure of inpatient postpartum recovery following caesarean and vaginal delivery modes. Turkish Society of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9682945/ /pubmed/36301286 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2022.21441 Text en © Copyright 2022 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kozanhan, Betül Yıldız, Munise Polat, Ayşenur Günenç, Oğuzhan Mahmut Tutar, Sami Sinan İyisoy, Mehmet Gözde Kulhan, Nur Sultan, Pervez Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 |
title | Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 |
title_full | Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 |
title_fullStr | Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 |
title_short | Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 |
title_sort | development and validation of a turkish version of obstetric quality of recovery-10 |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36301286 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2022.21441 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kozanhanbetul developmentandvalidationofaturkishversionofobstetricqualityofrecovery10 AT yıldızmunise developmentandvalidationofaturkishversionofobstetricqualityofrecovery10 AT polataysenur developmentandvalidationofaturkishversionofobstetricqualityofrecovery10 AT gunencoguzhan developmentandvalidationofaturkishversionofobstetricqualityofrecovery10 AT mahmuttutarsami developmentandvalidationofaturkishversionofobstetricqualityofrecovery10 AT sinaniyisoymehmet developmentandvalidationofaturkishversionofobstetricqualityofrecovery10 AT gozdekulhannur developmentandvalidationofaturkishversionofobstetricqualityofrecovery10 AT sultanpervez developmentandvalidationofaturkishversionofobstetricqualityofrecovery10 |