Cargando…

Novel Budesonide Suppository and Standard Budesonide Rectal Foam Induce High Rates of Clinical Remission and Mucosal Healing in Active Ulcerative Proctitis: a Randomised, Controlled, Non-inferiority Trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Proctitis is the least extensive type of ulcerative colitis, for which rectal therapy is rarely studied and is underused. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and patient’s preference of a novel formulation of budesonide suppository 4 mg, compared with a commercially avail...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kruis, Wolfgang, Siegmund, Britta, Lesniakowski, Konrad, Simanenkov, Vladimir, Khimion, Ludmila, Sobon, Marcin, Delmans, Glebs, Maksyashina, Svetlana V, Sablin, Oleg A, Pokrotnieks, Juris, Mostovoy, Yuriy, Datsenko, Olena, Abdulkhakov, Sayar, Dorofeyev, Andriy, Levchenko, Olena, Alexeeva, Olga, Andreev, Pavel, Kolesnik, Ivan P, Mihaly, Emese, Abrahamovych, Orest, Baluta, Malgorzata, Kharchenko, Nataliia, Viacheslav, Neshta, Uspenskiy, Yury, Vieth, Michael, Mohrbacher, Ralf, Mueller, Ralph, Greinwald, Roland
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9683080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35709376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac081
_version_ 1784834994755076096
author Kruis, Wolfgang
Siegmund, Britta
Lesniakowski, Konrad
Simanenkov, Vladimir
Khimion, Ludmila
Sobon, Marcin
Delmans, Glebs
Maksyashina, Svetlana V
Sablin, Oleg A
Pokrotnieks, Juris
Mostovoy, Yuriy
Datsenko, Olena
Abdulkhakov, Sayar
Dorofeyev, Andriy
Levchenko, Olena
Alexeeva, Olga
Andreev, Pavel
Kolesnik, Ivan P
Mihaly, Emese
Abrahamovych, Orest
Baluta, Malgorzata
Kharchenko, Nataliia
Viacheslav, Neshta
Uspenskiy, Yury
Vieth, Michael
Mohrbacher, Ralf
Mueller, Ralph
Greinwald, Roland
author_facet Kruis, Wolfgang
Siegmund, Britta
Lesniakowski, Konrad
Simanenkov, Vladimir
Khimion, Ludmila
Sobon, Marcin
Delmans, Glebs
Maksyashina, Svetlana V
Sablin, Oleg A
Pokrotnieks, Juris
Mostovoy, Yuriy
Datsenko, Olena
Abdulkhakov, Sayar
Dorofeyev, Andriy
Levchenko, Olena
Alexeeva, Olga
Andreev, Pavel
Kolesnik, Ivan P
Mihaly, Emese
Abrahamovych, Orest
Baluta, Malgorzata
Kharchenko, Nataliia
Viacheslav, Neshta
Uspenskiy, Yury
Vieth, Michael
Mohrbacher, Ralf
Mueller, Ralph
Greinwald, Roland
author_sort Kruis, Wolfgang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Proctitis is the least extensive type of ulcerative colitis, for which rectal therapy is rarely studied and is underused. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and patient’s preference of a novel formulation of budesonide suppository 4 mg, compared with a commercially available budesonide rectal foam 2 mg, for the treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis. METHODS: This was a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either budesonide 4 mg suppository or budesonide 2 mg foam once daily for 8 weeks. The co-primary endpoints were changes from baseline to Week 8 in clinical symptoms, for which clinical remission was defined as having a modified Ulcerative Colitis-Disease Activity Index [UC-DAI] subscore for stool frequency of 0 or 1 and a subscore for rectal bleeding of 0, and mucosal healing, defined as having a modified UC-DAI subscore for mucosal appearance of 0 or 1. Using a more stringent criterion, we additionally analysed deepened mucosal healing, which was defined as a mucosal appearance subscore of 0. Patient’s preference, physician’s global assessment, and quality of life were also assessed and analysed. RESULTS: Overall, 286 and 291 patients were included in the 4 mg suppository and 2 mg foam groups, respectively. Budesonide 4 mg suppository met the prespecified criterion for non-inferiority to the 2 mg foam in both co-primary endpoints of clinical remission and mucosal healing. Secondary endpoints consistently supported the non-inferiority of the suppository. Trends in favour of the suppository were observed in the subgroup of mesalazine non-responders. More patients reported a preference for the suppository over rectal foam. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ulcerative proctitis, budesonide 4 mg suppository was non-inferior to budesonide 2 mg foam in efficacy, and both were safe and well tolerated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9683080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96830802022-11-25 Novel Budesonide Suppository and Standard Budesonide Rectal Foam Induce High Rates of Clinical Remission and Mucosal Healing in Active Ulcerative Proctitis: a Randomised, Controlled, Non-inferiority Trial Kruis, Wolfgang Siegmund, Britta Lesniakowski, Konrad Simanenkov, Vladimir Khimion, Ludmila Sobon, Marcin Delmans, Glebs Maksyashina, Svetlana V Sablin, Oleg A Pokrotnieks, Juris Mostovoy, Yuriy Datsenko, Olena Abdulkhakov, Sayar Dorofeyev, Andriy Levchenko, Olena Alexeeva, Olga Andreev, Pavel Kolesnik, Ivan P Mihaly, Emese Abrahamovych, Orest Baluta, Malgorzata Kharchenko, Nataliia Viacheslav, Neshta Uspenskiy, Yury Vieth, Michael Mohrbacher, Ralf Mueller, Ralph Greinwald, Roland J Crohns Colitis Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Proctitis is the least extensive type of ulcerative colitis, for which rectal therapy is rarely studied and is underused. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and patient’s preference of a novel formulation of budesonide suppository 4 mg, compared with a commercially available budesonide rectal foam 2 mg, for the treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis. METHODS: This was a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either budesonide 4 mg suppository or budesonide 2 mg foam once daily for 8 weeks. The co-primary endpoints were changes from baseline to Week 8 in clinical symptoms, for which clinical remission was defined as having a modified Ulcerative Colitis-Disease Activity Index [UC-DAI] subscore for stool frequency of 0 or 1 and a subscore for rectal bleeding of 0, and mucosal healing, defined as having a modified UC-DAI subscore for mucosal appearance of 0 or 1. Using a more stringent criterion, we additionally analysed deepened mucosal healing, which was defined as a mucosal appearance subscore of 0. Patient’s preference, physician’s global assessment, and quality of life were also assessed and analysed. RESULTS: Overall, 286 and 291 patients were included in the 4 mg suppository and 2 mg foam groups, respectively. Budesonide 4 mg suppository met the prespecified criterion for non-inferiority to the 2 mg foam in both co-primary endpoints of clinical remission and mucosal healing. Secondary endpoints consistently supported the non-inferiority of the suppository. Trends in favour of the suppository were observed in the subgroup of mesalazine non-responders. More patients reported a preference for the suppository over rectal foam. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ulcerative proctitis, budesonide 4 mg suppository was non-inferior to budesonide 2 mg foam in efficacy, and both were safe and well tolerated. Oxford University Press 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9683080/ /pubmed/35709376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac081 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kruis, Wolfgang
Siegmund, Britta
Lesniakowski, Konrad
Simanenkov, Vladimir
Khimion, Ludmila
Sobon, Marcin
Delmans, Glebs
Maksyashina, Svetlana V
Sablin, Oleg A
Pokrotnieks, Juris
Mostovoy, Yuriy
Datsenko, Olena
Abdulkhakov, Sayar
Dorofeyev, Andriy
Levchenko, Olena
Alexeeva, Olga
Andreev, Pavel
Kolesnik, Ivan P
Mihaly, Emese
Abrahamovych, Orest
Baluta, Malgorzata
Kharchenko, Nataliia
Viacheslav, Neshta
Uspenskiy, Yury
Vieth, Michael
Mohrbacher, Ralf
Mueller, Ralph
Greinwald, Roland
Novel Budesonide Suppository and Standard Budesonide Rectal Foam Induce High Rates of Clinical Remission and Mucosal Healing in Active Ulcerative Proctitis: a Randomised, Controlled, Non-inferiority Trial
title Novel Budesonide Suppository and Standard Budesonide Rectal Foam Induce High Rates of Clinical Remission and Mucosal Healing in Active Ulcerative Proctitis: a Randomised, Controlled, Non-inferiority Trial
title_full Novel Budesonide Suppository and Standard Budesonide Rectal Foam Induce High Rates of Clinical Remission and Mucosal Healing in Active Ulcerative Proctitis: a Randomised, Controlled, Non-inferiority Trial
title_fullStr Novel Budesonide Suppository and Standard Budesonide Rectal Foam Induce High Rates of Clinical Remission and Mucosal Healing in Active Ulcerative Proctitis: a Randomised, Controlled, Non-inferiority Trial
title_full_unstemmed Novel Budesonide Suppository and Standard Budesonide Rectal Foam Induce High Rates of Clinical Remission and Mucosal Healing in Active Ulcerative Proctitis: a Randomised, Controlled, Non-inferiority Trial
title_short Novel Budesonide Suppository and Standard Budesonide Rectal Foam Induce High Rates of Clinical Remission and Mucosal Healing in Active Ulcerative Proctitis: a Randomised, Controlled, Non-inferiority Trial
title_sort novel budesonide suppository and standard budesonide rectal foam induce high rates of clinical remission and mucosal healing in active ulcerative proctitis: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9683080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35709376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac081
work_keys_str_mv AT kruiswolfgang novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT siegmundbritta novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT lesniakowskikonrad novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT simanenkovvladimir novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT khimionludmila novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT sobonmarcin novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT delmansglebs novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT maksyashinasvetlanav novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT sablinolega novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT pokrotnieksjuris novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT mostovoyyuriy novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT datsenkoolena novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT abdulkhakovsayar novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT dorofeyevandriy novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT levchenkoolena novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT alexeevaolga novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT andreevpavel novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT kolesnikivanp novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT mihalyemese novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT abrahamovychorest novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT balutamalgorzata novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT kharchenkonataliia novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT viacheslavneshta novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT uspenskiyyury novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT viethmichael novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT mohrbacherralf novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT muellerralph novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT greinwaldroland novelbudesonidesuppositoryandstandardbudesoniderectalfoaminducehighratesofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealinginactiveulcerativeproctitisarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial