Cargando…
Alert‐Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster‐Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: Many hospitalized patients are not administered prescribed doses of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this cluster‐randomized controlled trial, all adult non–intensive care units (10 medical, 6 surgical) in 1 academic hospital were randomized to ei...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9683644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36047732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.027119 |
_version_ | 1784835097204097024 |
---|---|
author | Haut, Elliott R. Owodunni, Oluwafemi P. Wang, Jiangxia Shaffer, Dauryne L. Hobson, Deborah B. Yenokyan, Gayane Kraus, Peggy S. Farrow, Norma E. Canner, Joseph K. Florecki, Katherine L. Webster, Kristen L.W. Holzmueller, Christine G. Aboagye, Jonathan K. Popoola, Victor O. Kia, Mujan Varasteh Pronovost, Peter J. Streiff, Michael B. Lau, Brandyn D. |
author_facet | Haut, Elliott R. Owodunni, Oluwafemi P. Wang, Jiangxia Shaffer, Dauryne L. Hobson, Deborah B. Yenokyan, Gayane Kraus, Peggy S. Farrow, Norma E. Canner, Joseph K. Florecki, Katherine L. Webster, Kristen L.W. Holzmueller, Christine G. Aboagye, Jonathan K. Popoola, Victor O. Kia, Mujan Varasteh Pronovost, Peter J. Streiff, Michael B. Lau, Brandyn D. |
author_sort | Haut, Elliott R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many hospitalized patients are not administered prescribed doses of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this cluster‐randomized controlled trial, all adult non–intensive care units (10 medical, 6 surgical) in 1 academic hospital were randomized to either a real‐time, electronic alert–triggered, patient‐centered education bundle intervention or nurse feedback intervention to evaluate their effectiveness for reducing nonadministration of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Primary outcome was the proportion of nonadministered doses of prescribed pharmacologic prophylaxis. Secondary outcomes were proportions of nonadministered doses stratified by nonadministration reasons (patient refusal, other). To test our primary hypothesis that both interventions would reduce nonadministration, we compared outcomes pre‐ versus postintervention within each cohort. Secondary hypotheses were tested comparing the effectiveness between cohorts. Of 11 098 patient visits, overall dose nonadministration declined significantly after the interventions (13.4% versus 9.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.57–0.71]). Nonadministration decreased significantly (P<0.001) in both arms: patient‐centered education bundle, 12.2% versus 7.4% (OR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.48–0.66]), and nurse feedback, 14.7% versus 11.2% (OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.62–0.84]). Patient refusal decreased significantly in both arms: patient‐centered education bundle, 7.3% versus 3.7% (OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.37–0.58]), and nurse feedback, 9.5% versus 7.1% (OR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.59–0.86]). No differential effect occurred on medical versus surgical units. The patient‐centered education bundle was significantly more effective in reducing all nonadministered (P=0.03) and refused doses (P=0.003) compared with nurse feedback (OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.0–1.61]; P=0.03 for interaction). CONCLUSIONS: Information technology strategies like the alert‐triggered, targeted patient‐centered education bundle, and nurse‐focused audit and feedback can improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis administration. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03367364. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9683644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96836442022-11-25 Alert‐Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster‐Randomized Controlled Trial Haut, Elliott R. Owodunni, Oluwafemi P. Wang, Jiangxia Shaffer, Dauryne L. Hobson, Deborah B. Yenokyan, Gayane Kraus, Peggy S. Farrow, Norma E. Canner, Joseph K. Florecki, Katherine L. Webster, Kristen L.W. Holzmueller, Christine G. Aboagye, Jonathan K. Popoola, Victor O. Kia, Mujan Varasteh Pronovost, Peter J. Streiff, Michael B. Lau, Brandyn D. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Many hospitalized patients are not administered prescribed doses of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this cluster‐randomized controlled trial, all adult non–intensive care units (10 medical, 6 surgical) in 1 academic hospital were randomized to either a real‐time, electronic alert–triggered, patient‐centered education bundle intervention or nurse feedback intervention to evaluate their effectiveness for reducing nonadministration of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Primary outcome was the proportion of nonadministered doses of prescribed pharmacologic prophylaxis. Secondary outcomes were proportions of nonadministered doses stratified by nonadministration reasons (patient refusal, other). To test our primary hypothesis that both interventions would reduce nonadministration, we compared outcomes pre‐ versus postintervention within each cohort. Secondary hypotheses were tested comparing the effectiveness between cohorts. Of 11 098 patient visits, overall dose nonadministration declined significantly after the interventions (13.4% versus 9.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.57–0.71]). Nonadministration decreased significantly (P<0.001) in both arms: patient‐centered education bundle, 12.2% versus 7.4% (OR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.48–0.66]), and nurse feedback, 14.7% versus 11.2% (OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.62–0.84]). Patient refusal decreased significantly in both arms: patient‐centered education bundle, 7.3% versus 3.7% (OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.37–0.58]), and nurse feedback, 9.5% versus 7.1% (OR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.59–0.86]). No differential effect occurred on medical versus surgical units. The patient‐centered education bundle was significantly more effective in reducing all nonadministered (P=0.03) and refused doses (P=0.003) compared with nurse feedback (OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.0–1.61]; P=0.03 for interaction). CONCLUSIONS: Information technology strategies like the alert‐triggered, targeted patient‐centered education bundle, and nurse‐focused audit and feedback can improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis administration. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03367364. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9683644/ /pubmed/36047732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.027119 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Haut, Elliott R. Owodunni, Oluwafemi P. Wang, Jiangxia Shaffer, Dauryne L. Hobson, Deborah B. Yenokyan, Gayane Kraus, Peggy S. Farrow, Norma E. Canner, Joseph K. Florecki, Katherine L. Webster, Kristen L.W. Holzmueller, Christine G. Aboagye, Jonathan K. Popoola, Victor O. Kia, Mujan Varasteh Pronovost, Peter J. Streiff, Michael B. Lau, Brandyn D. Alert‐Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster‐Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Alert‐Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster‐Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Alert‐Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster‐Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Alert‐Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster‐Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Alert‐Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster‐Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Alert‐Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster‐Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | alert‐triggered patient education versus nurse feedback for nonadministered venous thromboembolism prophylaxis doses: a cluster‐randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9683644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36047732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.027119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hautelliottr alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT owodunnioluwafemip alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangjiangxia alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shafferdaurynel alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hobsondeborahb alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yenokyangayane alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT krauspeggys alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT farrownormae alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cannerjosephk alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT floreckikatherinel alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT websterkristenlw alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT holzmuellerchristineg alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT aboagyejonathank alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT popoolavictoro alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kiamujanvarasteh alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pronovostpeterj alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT streiffmichaelb alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT laubrandynd alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |