Cargando…

Alert‐Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster‐Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Many hospitalized patients are not administered prescribed doses of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this cluster‐randomized controlled trial, all adult non–intensive care units (10 medical, 6 surgical) in 1 academic hospital were randomized to ei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haut, Elliott R., Owodunni, Oluwafemi P., Wang, Jiangxia, Shaffer, Dauryne L., Hobson, Deborah B., Yenokyan, Gayane, Kraus, Peggy S., Farrow, Norma E., Canner, Joseph K., Florecki, Katherine L., Webster, Kristen L.W., Holzmueller, Christine G., Aboagye, Jonathan K., Popoola, Victor O., Kia, Mujan Varasteh, Pronovost, Peter J., Streiff, Michael B., Lau, Brandyn D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9683644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36047732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.027119
_version_ 1784835097204097024
author Haut, Elliott R.
Owodunni, Oluwafemi P.
Wang, Jiangxia
Shaffer, Dauryne L.
Hobson, Deborah B.
Yenokyan, Gayane
Kraus, Peggy S.
Farrow, Norma E.
Canner, Joseph K.
Florecki, Katherine L.
Webster, Kristen L.W.
Holzmueller, Christine G.
Aboagye, Jonathan K.
Popoola, Victor O.
Kia, Mujan Varasteh
Pronovost, Peter J.
Streiff, Michael B.
Lau, Brandyn D.
author_facet Haut, Elliott R.
Owodunni, Oluwafemi P.
Wang, Jiangxia
Shaffer, Dauryne L.
Hobson, Deborah B.
Yenokyan, Gayane
Kraus, Peggy S.
Farrow, Norma E.
Canner, Joseph K.
Florecki, Katherine L.
Webster, Kristen L.W.
Holzmueller, Christine G.
Aboagye, Jonathan K.
Popoola, Victor O.
Kia, Mujan Varasteh
Pronovost, Peter J.
Streiff, Michael B.
Lau, Brandyn D.
author_sort Haut, Elliott R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many hospitalized patients are not administered prescribed doses of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this cluster‐randomized controlled trial, all adult non–intensive care units (10 medical, 6 surgical) in 1 academic hospital were randomized to either a real‐time, electronic alert–triggered, patient‐centered education bundle intervention or nurse feedback intervention to evaluate their effectiveness for reducing nonadministration of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Primary outcome was the proportion of nonadministered doses of prescribed pharmacologic prophylaxis. Secondary outcomes were proportions of nonadministered doses stratified by nonadministration reasons (patient refusal, other). To test our primary hypothesis that both interventions would reduce nonadministration, we compared outcomes pre‐ versus postintervention within each cohort. Secondary hypotheses were tested comparing the effectiveness between cohorts. Of 11 098 patient visits, overall dose nonadministration declined significantly after the interventions (13.4% versus 9.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.57–0.71]). Nonadministration decreased significantly (P<0.001) in both arms: patient‐centered education bundle, 12.2% versus 7.4% (OR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.48–0.66]), and nurse feedback, 14.7% versus 11.2% (OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.62–0.84]). Patient refusal decreased significantly in both arms: patient‐centered education bundle, 7.3% versus 3.7% (OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.37–0.58]), and nurse feedback, 9.5% versus 7.1% (OR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.59–0.86]). No differential effect occurred on medical versus surgical units. The patient‐centered education bundle was significantly more effective in reducing all nonadministered (P=0.03) and refused doses (P=0.003) compared with nurse feedback (OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.0–1.61]; P=0.03 for interaction). CONCLUSIONS: Information technology strategies like the alert‐triggered, targeted patient‐centered education bundle, and nurse‐focused audit and feedback can improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis administration. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03367364.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9683644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96836442022-11-25 Alert‐Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster‐Randomized Controlled Trial Haut, Elliott R. Owodunni, Oluwafemi P. Wang, Jiangxia Shaffer, Dauryne L. Hobson, Deborah B. Yenokyan, Gayane Kraus, Peggy S. Farrow, Norma E. Canner, Joseph K. Florecki, Katherine L. Webster, Kristen L.W. Holzmueller, Christine G. Aboagye, Jonathan K. Popoola, Victor O. Kia, Mujan Varasteh Pronovost, Peter J. Streiff, Michael B. Lau, Brandyn D. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Many hospitalized patients are not administered prescribed doses of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this cluster‐randomized controlled trial, all adult non–intensive care units (10 medical, 6 surgical) in 1 academic hospital were randomized to either a real‐time, electronic alert–triggered, patient‐centered education bundle intervention or nurse feedback intervention to evaluate their effectiveness for reducing nonadministration of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Primary outcome was the proportion of nonadministered doses of prescribed pharmacologic prophylaxis. Secondary outcomes were proportions of nonadministered doses stratified by nonadministration reasons (patient refusal, other). To test our primary hypothesis that both interventions would reduce nonadministration, we compared outcomes pre‐ versus postintervention within each cohort. Secondary hypotheses were tested comparing the effectiveness between cohorts. Of 11 098 patient visits, overall dose nonadministration declined significantly after the interventions (13.4% versus 9.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.57–0.71]). Nonadministration decreased significantly (P<0.001) in both arms: patient‐centered education bundle, 12.2% versus 7.4% (OR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.48–0.66]), and nurse feedback, 14.7% versus 11.2% (OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.62–0.84]). Patient refusal decreased significantly in both arms: patient‐centered education bundle, 7.3% versus 3.7% (OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.37–0.58]), and nurse feedback, 9.5% versus 7.1% (OR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.59–0.86]). No differential effect occurred on medical versus surgical units. The patient‐centered education bundle was significantly more effective in reducing all nonadministered (P=0.03) and refused doses (P=0.003) compared with nurse feedback (OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.0–1.61]; P=0.03 for interaction). CONCLUSIONS: Information technology strategies like the alert‐triggered, targeted patient‐centered education bundle, and nurse‐focused audit and feedback can improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis administration. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03367364. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9683644/ /pubmed/36047732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.027119 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Haut, Elliott R.
Owodunni, Oluwafemi P.
Wang, Jiangxia
Shaffer, Dauryne L.
Hobson, Deborah B.
Yenokyan, Gayane
Kraus, Peggy S.
Farrow, Norma E.
Canner, Joseph K.
Florecki, Katherine L.
Webster, Kristen L.W.
Holzmueller, Christine G.
Aboagye, Jonathan K.
Popoola, Victor O.
Kia, Mujan Varasteh
Pronovost, Peter J.
Streiff, Michael B.
Lau, Brandyn D.
Alert‐Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster‐Randomized Controlled Trial
title Alert‐Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster‐Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Alert‐Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster‐Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Alert‐Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster‐Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Alert‐Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster‐Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Alert‐Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster‐Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort alert‐triggered patient education versus nurse feedback for nonadministered venous thromboembolism prophylaxis doses: a cluster‐randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9683644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36047732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.027119
work_keys_str_mv AT hautelliottr alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT owodunnioluwafemip alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangjiangxia alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shafferdaurynel alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hobsondeborahb alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yenokyangayane alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT krauspeggys alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT farrownormae alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cannerjosephk alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT floreckikatherinel alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT websterkristenlw alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT holzmuellerchristineg alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aboagyejonathank alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT popoolavictoro alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kiamujanvarasteh alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pronovostpeterj alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT streiffmichaelb alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT laubrandynd alerttriggeredpatienteducationversusnursefeedbackfornonadministeredvenousthromboembolismprophylaxisdosesaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial