Cargando…

Sex Differences and Utility of Treadmill Testing in Long‐QT Syndrome

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of congenital long‐QT syndrome (LQTS) is complicated by phenotypic ambiguity, with a frequent normal‐to‐borderline resting QT interval. A 3‐step algorithm based on exercise response of the corrected QT interval (QTc) was previously developed to diagnose patients with LQTS and p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yee, Lauren A., Han, Hui‐Chen, Davies, Brianna, Pearman, Charles M., Laksman, Zachary W. M., Roberts, Jason D., Steinberg, Christian, Tadros, Rafik, Cadrin‐Tourigny, Julia, Simpson, Christopher S., Gardner, Martin, MacIntyre, Ciorsti, Arbour, Laura, Leather, Richard, Fournier, Anne, Green, Martin S., Kimber, Shane, Angaran, Paul, Sanatani, Shubhayan, Joza, Jacqueline, Khan, Habib, Healey, Jeffrey S., Atallah, Joseph, Seifer, Colette, Krahn, Andrew D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9683668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36102233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.025108
_version_ 1784835103022645248
author Yee, Lauren A.
Han, Hui‐Chen
Davies, Brianna
Pearman, Charles M.
Laksman, Zachary W. M.
Roberts, Jason D.
Steinberg, Christian
Tadros, Rafik
Cadrin‐Tourigny, Julia
Simpson, Christopher S.
Gardner, Martin
MacIntyre, Ciorsti
Arbour, Laura
Leather, Richard
Fournier, Anne
Green, Martin S.
Kimber, Shane
Angaran, Paul
Sanatani, Shubhayan
Joza, Jacqueline
Khan, Habib
Healey, Jeffrey S.
Atallah, Joseph
Seifer, Colette
Krahn, Andrew D.
author_facet Yee, Lauren A.
Han, Hui‐Chen
Davies, Brianna
Pearman, Charles M.
Laksman, Zachary W. M.
Roberts, Jason D.
Steinberg, Christian
Tadros, Rafik
Cadrin‐Tourigny, Julia
Simpson, Christopher S.
Gardner, Martin
MacIntyre, Ciorsti
Arbour, Laura
Leather, Richard
Fournier, Anne
Green, Martin S.
Kimber, Shane
Angaran, Paul
Sanatani, Shubhayan
Joza, Jacqueline
Khan, Habib
Healey, Jeffrey S.
Atallah, Joseph
Seifer, Colette
Krahn, Andrew D.
author_sort Yee, Lauren A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of congenital long‐QT syndrome (LQTS) is complicated by phenotypic ambiguity, with a frequent normal‐to‐borderline resting QT interval. A 3‐step algorithm based on exercise response of the corrected QT interval (QTc) was previously developed to diagnose patients with LQTS and predict subtype. This study evaluated the 3‐step algorithm in a population that is more representative of the general population with LQTS with milder phenotypes and establishes sex‐specific cutoffs beyond the resting QTc. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 208 LQTS likely pathogenic or pathogenic KCNQ1 or KCNH2 variant carriers in the Canadian NLQTS (National Long‐QT Syndrome) Registry and 215 unaffected controls from the HiRO (Hearts in Rhythm Organization) Registry. Exercise treadmill tests were analyzed across the 5 stages of the Bruce protocol. The predictive value of exercise ECG characteristics was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to identify optimal cutoff values. A total of 78% of male carriers and 74% of female carriers had a resting QTc value in the normal‐to‐borderline range. The 4‐minute recovery QTc demonstrated the best predictive value for carrier status in both sexes, with better LQTS ascertainment in female patients (area under the curve, 0.90 versus 0.82), with greater sensitivity and specificity. The optimal cutoff value for the 4‐minute recovery period was 440 milliseconds for male patients and 450 milliseconds for female patients. The 1‐minute recovery QTc had the best predictive value in female patients for differentiating LQTS1 versus LQTS2 (area under the curve, 0.82), and the peak exercise QTc had a marginally better predictive value in male patients for subtype with (area under the curve, 0.71). The optimal cutoff value for the 1‐minute recovery period was 435 milliseconds for male patients and 455 milliseconds for femal patients. CONCLUSIONS: The 3‐step QT exercise algorithm is a valid tool for the diagnosis of LQTS in a general population with more frequent ambiguity in phenotype. The algorithm is a simple and reliable method for the identification and prediction of the 2 major genotypes of LQTS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9683668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96836682022-11-25 Sex Differences and Utility of Treadmill Testing in Long‐QT Syndrome Yee, Lauren A. Han, Hui‐Chen Davies, Brianna Pearman, Charles M. Laksman, Zachary W. M. Roberts, Jason D. Steinberg, Christian Tadros, Rafik Cadrin‐Tourigny, Julia Simpson, Christopher S. Gardner, Martin MacIntyre, Ciorsti Arbour, Laura Leather, Richard Fournier, Anne Green, Martin S. Kimber, Shane Angaran, Paul Sanatani, Shubhayan Joza, Jacqueline Khan, Habib Healey, Jeffrey S. Atallah, Joseph Seifer, Colette Krahn, Andrew D. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of congenital long‐QT syndrome (LQTS) is complicated by phenotypic ambiguity, with a frequent normal‐to‐borderline resting QT interval. A 3‐step algorithm based on exercise response of the corrected QT interval (QTc) was previously developed to diagnose patients with LQTS and predict subtype. This study evaluated the 3‐step algorithm in a population that is more representative of the general population with LQTS with milder phenotypes and establishes sex‐specific cutoffs beyond the resting QTc. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 208 LQTS likely pathogenic or pathogenic KCNQ1 or KCNH2 variant carriers in the Canadian NLQTS (National Long‐QT Syndrome) Registry and 215 unaffected controls from the HiRO (Hearts in Rhythm Organization) Registry. Exercise treadmill tests were analyzed across the 5 stages of the Bruce protocol. The predictive value of exercise ECG characteristics was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to identify optimal cutoff values. A total of 78% of male carriers and 74% of female carriers had a resting QTc value in the normal‐to‐borderline range. The 4‐minute recovery QTc demonstrated the best predictive value for carrier status in both sexes, with better LQTS ascertainment in female patients (area under the curve, 0.90 versus 0.82), with greater sensitivity and specificity. The optimal cutoff value for the 4‐minute recovery period was 440 milliseconds for male patients and 450 milliseconds for female patients. The 1‐minute recovery QTc had the best predictive value in female patients for differentiating LQTS1 versus LQTS2 (area under the curve, 0.82), and the peak exercise QTc had a marginally better predictive value in male patients for subtype with (area under the curve, 0.71). The optimal cutoff value for the 1‐minute recovery period was 435 milliseconds for male patients and 455 milliseconds for femal patients. CONCLUSIONS: The 3‐step QT exercise algorithm is a valid tool for the diagnosis of LQTS in a general population with more frequent ambiguity in phenotype. The algorithm is a simple and reliable method for the identification and prediction of the 2 major genotypes of LQTS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9683668/ /pubmed/36102233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.025108 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Yee, Lauren A.
Han, Hui‐Chen
Davies, Brianna
Pearman, Charles M.
Laksman, Zachary W. M.
Roberts, Jason D.
Steinberg, Christian
Tadros, Rafik
Cadrin‐Tourigny, Julia
Simpson, Christopher S.
Gardner, Martin
MacIntyre, Ciorsti
Arbour, Laura
Leather, Richard
Fournier, Anne
Green, Martin S.
Kimber, Shane
Angaran, Paul
Sanatani, Shubhayan
Joza, Jacqueline
Khan, Habib
Healey, Jeffrey S.
Atallah, Joseph
Seifer, Colette
Krahn, Andrew D.
Sex Differences and Utility of Treadmill Testing in Long‐QT Syndrome
title Sex Differences and Utility of Treadmill Testing in Long‐QT Syndrome
title_full Sex Differences and Utility of Treadmill Testing in Long‐QT Syndrome
title_fullStr Sex Differences and Utility of Treadmill Testing in Long‐QT Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Sex Differences and Utility of Treadmill Testing in Long‐QT Syndrome
title_short Sex Differences and Utility of Treadmill Testing in Long‐QT Syndrome
title_sort sex differences and utility of treadmill testing in long‐qt syndrome
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9683668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36102233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.025108
work_keys_str_mv AT yeelaurena sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT hanhuichen sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT daviesbrianna sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT pearmancharlesm sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT laksmanzacharywm sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT robertsjasond sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT steinbergchristian sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT tadrosrafik sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT cadrintourignyjulia sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT simpsonchristophers sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT gardnermartin sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT macintyreciorsti sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT arbourlaura sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT leatherrichard sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT fournieranne sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT greenmartins sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT kimbershane sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT angaranpaul sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT sanatanishubhayan sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT jozajacqueline sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT khanhabib sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT healeyjeffreys sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT atallahjoseph sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT seifercolette sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome
AT krahnandrewd sexdifferencesandutilityoftreadmilltestinginlongqtsyndrome