Cargando…

Prevalence of Proximal Contact Loss between Implant-Supported Prostheses and Adjacent Natural Teeth: An Umbrella Review

Contact loss between the implant prosthesis and adjacent natural teeth is a clinical complication whose overall prevalence is uncertain. Therefore, the main purpose of this umbrella study was to evaluate the extent of contact loss between implant prostheses and adjacent natural teeth. Electronic dat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fathi, Amirhossein, Mosharraf, Ramin, Ebadian, Behnaz, Javan, Mehdi, Isler, Sabire, Dezaki, Sara Nasrollahi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9683885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35688456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1745771
_version_ 1784835152516481024
author Fathi, Amirhossein
Mosharraf, Ramin
Ebadian, Behnaz
Javan, Mehdi
Isler, Sabire
Dezaki, Sara Nasrollahi
author_facet Fathi, Amirhossein
Mosharraf, Ramin
Ebadian, Behnaz
Javan, Mehdi
Isler, Sabire
Dezaki, Sara Nasrollahi
author_sort Fathi, Amirhossein
collection PubMed
description Contact loss between the implant prosthesis and adjacent natural teeth is a clinical complication whose overall prevalence is uncertain. Therefore, the main purpose of this umbrella study was to evaluate the extent of contact loss between implant prostheses and adjacent natural teeth. Electronic database of MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar was searched until August 2021 without considering language restrictions and according to Preferred Report Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis guidelines (preferential reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis). Inclusion criteria were systematic/meta-analysis review articles related to contact loss between implant prostheses and adjacent natural teeth. Inclusion criteria and risk of bias for the selected systematic/meta-analysis review studies were assessed by two or three qualified researchers, and the fourth researcher was used to resolve the ambiguities. From 43 eligible articles, five systematic/meta-analysis review studies were selected for this study. Important information such as the range of contact points, the prevalence, and the location of the contact loss was extracted. Three research studies had a low risk of bias and were considered clinical evidence. Analysis of low-risk studies showed that the superiority of open contact loss was excessive. Prevalence of proximal contact loss was more in mesial contact, especially in the mandibular arch. No significant differences were reported in sex or between the posterior and anterior regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9683885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96838852022-11-24 Prevalence of Proximal Contact Loss between Implant-Supported Prostheses and Adjacent Natural Teeth: An Umbrella Review Fathi, Amirhossein Mosharraf, Ramin Ebadian, Behnaz Javan, Mehdi Isler, Sabire Dezaki, Sara Nasrollahi Eur J Dent Contact loss between the implant prosthesis and adjacent natural teeth is a clinical complication whose overall prevalence is uncertain. Therefore, the main purpose of this umbrella study was to evaluate the extent of contact loss between implant prostheses and adjacent natural teeth. Electronic database of MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar was searched until August 2021 without considering language restrictions and according to Preferred Report Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis guidelines (preferential reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis). Inclusion criteria were systematic/meta-analysis review articles related to contact loss between implant prostheses and adjacent natural teeth. Inclusion criteria and risk of bias for the selected systematic/meta-analysis review studies were assessed by two or three qualified researchers, and the fourth researcher was used to resolve the ambiguities. From 43 eligible articles, five systematic/meta-analysis review studies were selected for this study. Important information such as the range of contact points, the prevalence, and the location of the contact loss was extracted. Three research studies had a low risk of bias and were considered clinical evidence. Analysis of low-risk studies showed that the superiority of open contact loss was excessive. Prevalence of proximal contact loss was more in mesial contact, especially in the mandibular arch. No significant differences were reported in sex or between the posterior and anterior regions. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2022-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9683885/ /pubmed/35688456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1745771 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Fathi, Amirhossein
Mosharraf, Ramin
Ebadian, Behnaz
Javan, Mehdi
Isler, Sabire
Dezaki, Sara Nasrollahi
Prevalence of Proximal Contact Loss between Implant-Supported Prostheses and Adjacent Natural Teeth: An Umbrella Review
title Prevalence of Proximal Contact Loss between Implant-Supported Prostheses and Adjacent Natural Teeth: An Umbrella Review
title_full Prevalence of Proximal Contact Loss between Implant-Supported Prostheses and Adjacent Natural Teeth: An Umbrella Review
title_fullStr Prevalence of Proximal Contact Loss between Implant-Supported Prostheses and Adjacent Natural Teeth: An Umbrella Review
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Proximal Contact Loss between Implant-Supported Prostheses and Adjacent Natural Teeth: An Umbrella Review
title_short Prevalence of Proximal Contact Loss between Implant-Supported Prostheses and Adjacent Natural Teeth: An Umbrella Review
title_sort prevalence of proximal contact loss between implant-supported prostheses and adjacent natural teeth: an umbrella review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9683885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35688456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1745771
work_keys_str_mv AT fathiamirhossein prevalenceofproximalcontactlossbetweenimplantsupportedprosthesesandadjacentnaturalteethanumbrellareview
AT mosharraframin prevalenceofproximalcontactlossbetweenimplantsupportedprosthesesandadjacentnaturalteethanumbrellareview
AT ebadianbehnaz prevalenceofproximalcontactlossbetweenimplantsupportedprosthesesandadjacentnaturalteethanumbrellareview
AT javanmehdi prevalenceofproximalcontactlossbetweenimplantsupportedprosthesesandadjacentnaturalteethanumbrellareview
AT islersabire prevalenceofproximalcontactlossbetweenimplantsupportedprosthesesandadjacentnaturalteethanumbrellareview
AT dezakisaranasrollahi prevalenceofproximalcontactlossbetweenimplantsupportedprosthesesandadjacentnaturalteethanumbrellareview