Cargando…
Systematic Cross-biospecimen Evaluation of DNA Extraction Kits for Long- and Short-read Multi-metagenomic Sequencing Studies
High-quality DNA extraction is a crucial step in metagenomic studies. Bias by different isolation kits impairs the comparison across datasets. A trending topic is, however, the analysis of multiple metagenomes from the same patients to draw a holistic picture of microbiota associated with diseases....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35680095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2022.05.006 |
_version_ | 1784835215707865088 |
---|---|
author | Rehner, Jacqueline Schmartz, Georges Pierre Groeger, Laura Dastbaz, Jan Ludwig, Nicole Hannig, Matthias Rupf, Stefan Seitz, Berthold Flockerzi, Elias Berger, Tim Reichert, Matthias Christian Krawczyk, Marcin Meese, Eckart Herr, Christian Bals, Robert Becker, Sören L. Keller, Andreas Müller, Rolf |
author_facet | Rehner, Jacqueline Schmartz, Georges Pierre Groeger, Laura Dastbaz, Jan Ludwig, Nicole Hannig, Matthias Rupf, Stefan Seitz, Berthold Flockerzi, Elias Berger, Tim Reichert, Matthias Christian Krawczyk, Marcin Meese, Eckart Herr, Christian Bals, Robert Becker, Sören L. Keller, Andreas Müller, Rolf |
author_sort | Rehner, Jacqueline |
collection | PubMed |
description | High-quality DNA extraction is a crucial step in metagenomic studies. Bias by different isolation kits impairs the comparison across datasets. A trending topic is, however, the analysis of multiple metagenomes from the same patients to draw a holistic picture of microbiota associated with diseases. We thus collected bile, stool, saliva, plaque, sputum, and conjunctival swab samples and performed DNA extraction with three commercial kits. For each combination of the specimen type and DNA extraction kit, 20-gigabase (Gb) metagenomic data were generated using short-read sequencing. While profiles of the specimen types showed close proximity to each other, we observed notable differences in the alpha diversity and composition of the microbiota depending on the DNA extraction kits. No kit outperformed all selected kits on every specimen. We reached consistently good results using the Qiagen QiAamp DNA Microbiome Kit. Depending on the specimen, our data indicate that over 10 Gb of sequencing data are required to achieve sufficient resolution, but DNA-based identification is superior to identification by mass spectrometry. Finally, long-read nanopore sequencing confirmed the results (correlation coefficient > 0.98). Our results thus suggest using a strategy with only one kit for studies aiming for a direct comparison of multiple microbiotas from the same patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9684153 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96841532022-11-25 Systematic Cross-biospecimen Evaluation of DNA Extraction Kits for Long- and Short-read Multi-metagenomic Sequencing Studies Rehner, Jacqueline Schmartz, Georges Pierre Groeger, Laura Dastbaz, Jan Ludwig, Nicole Hannig, Matthias Rupf, Stefan Seitz, Berthold Flockerzi, Elias Berger, Tim Reichert, Matthias Christian Krawczyk, Marcin Meese, Eckart Herr, Christian Bals, Robert Becker, Sören L. Keller, Andreas Müller, Rolf Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics Original Research High-quality DNA extraction is a crucial step in metagenomic studies. Bias by different isolation kits impairs the comparison across datasets. A trending topic is, however, the analysis of multiple metagenomes from the same patients to draw a holistic picture of microbiota associated with diseases. We thus collected bile, stool, saliva, plaque, sputum, and conjunctival swab samples and performed DNA extraction with three commercial kits. For each combination of the specimen type and DNA extraction kit, 20-gigabase (Gb) metagenomic data were generated using short-read sequencing. While profiles of the specimen types showed close proximity to each other, we observed notable differences in the alpha diversity and composition of the microbiota depending on the DNA extraction kits. No kit outperformed all selected kits on every specimen. We reached consistently good results using the Qiagen QiAamp DNA Microbiome Kit. Depending on the specimen, our data indicate that over 10 Gb of sequencing data are required to achieve sufficient resolution, but DNA-based identification is superior to identification by mass spectrometry. Finally, long-read nanopore sequencing confirmed the results (correlation coefficient > 0.98). Our results thus suggest using a strategy with only one kit for studies aiming for a direct comparison of multiple microbiotas from the same patients. Elsevier 2022-04 2022-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9684153/ /pubmed/35680095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2022.05.006 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Rehner, Jacqueline Schmartz, Georges Pierre Groeger, Laura Dastbaz, Jan Ludwig, Nicole Hannig, Matthias Rupf, Stefan Seitz, Berthold Flockerzi, Elias Berger, Tim Reichert, Matthias Christian Krawczyk, Marcin Meese, Eckart Herr, Christian Bals, Robert Becker, Sören L. Keller, Andreas Müller, Rolf Systematic Cross-biospecimen Evaluation of DNA Extraction Kits for Long- and Short-read Multi-metagenomic Sequencing Studies |
title | Systematic Cross-biospecimen Evaluation of DNA Extraction Kits for Long- and Short-read Multi-metagenomic Sequencing Studies |
title_full | Systematic Cross-biospecimen Evaluation of DNA Extraction Kits for Long- and Short-read Multi-metagenomic Sequencing Studies |
title_fullStr | Systematic Cross-biospecimen Evaluation of DNA Extraction Kits for Long- and Short-read Multi-metagenomic Sequencing Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Cross-biospecimen Evaluation of DNA Extraction Kits for Long- and Short-read Multi-metagenomic Sequencing Studies |
title_short | Systematic Cross-biospecimen Evaluation of DNA Extraction Kits for Long- and Short-read Multi-metagenomic Sequencing Studies |
title_sort | systematic cross-biospecimen evaluation of dna extraction kits for long- and short-read multi-metagenomic sequencing studies |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35680095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2022.05.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rehnerjacqueline systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies AT schmartzgeorgespierre systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies AT groegerlaura systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies AT dastbazjan systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies AT ludwignicole systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies AT hannigmatthias systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies AT rupfstefan systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies AT seitzberthold systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies AT flockerzielias systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies AT bergertim systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies AT reichertmatthiaschristian systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies AT krawczykmarcin systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies AT meeseeckart systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies AT herrchristian systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies AT balsrobert systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies AT beckersorenl systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies AT kellerandreas systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies AT mullerrolf systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies AT systematiccrossbiospecimenevaluationofdnaextractionkitsforlongandshortreadmultimetagenomicsequencingstudies |