Cargando…

Risk stratification in adult and pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Currently, risk stratification is the cornerstone of determining treatment strategy for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Since the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society (ESC/ERS) guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hype...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lokhorst, Chantal, van der Werf, Sjoukje, Berger, Rolf M. F., Douwes, Johannes M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36440049
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1035453
_version_ 1784835223701159936
author Lokhorst, Chantal
van der Werf, Sjoukje
Berger, Rolf M. F.
Douwes, Johannes M.
author_facet Lokhorst, Chantal
van der Werf, Sjoukje
Berger, Rolf M. F.
Douwes, Johannes M.
author_sort Lokhorst, Chantal
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Currently, risk stratification is the cornerstone of determining treatment strategy for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Since the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society (ESC/ERS) guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension recommended risk assessment, the number of studies reporting risk stratification has considerably increased. This systematic review aims to report and compare the variables and prognostic value of the various risk stratification models for outcome prediction in adult and pediatric PAH. METHODS: A systematic search with terms related to PAH, pediatric pulmonary hypertension, and risk stratification was performed through databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to June 8, 2022. Observational studies and clinical trials on risk stratification in adult and pediatric PAH were included, excluding case reports/series, guidelines, and reviews. Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool. Data on the variables used in the models and the predictive strength of the models given by c-statistic were extracted from eligible studies. RESULTS: A total of 74 studies were eligible for inclusion, with this review focusing on model development (n = 21), model validation (n = 13), and model enhancement (n = 9). The variables used most often in current risk stratification models were the non-invasive WHO functional class, 6-minute walk distance and BNP/NT-proBNP, and the invasive mean right atrial pressure, cardiac index and mixed venous oxygen saturation. C-statistics of current risk stratification models range from 0.56 to 0.83 in adults and from 0.69 to 0.78 in children (only two studies available). Risk stratification models focusing solely on echocardiographic parameters or biomarkers have also been reported. CONCLUSION: Studies reporting risk stratification in pediatric PAH are scarce. This systematic review provides an overview of current data on risk stratification models and its value for guiding treatment strategies in PAH. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022316885], identifier [CRD42022316885].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9684185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96841852022-11-25 Risk stratification in adult and pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review Lokhorst, Chantal van der Werf, Sjoukje Berger, Rolf M. F. Douwes, Johannes M. Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine INTRODUCTION: Currently, risk stratification is the cornerstone of determining treatment strategy for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Since the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society (ESC/ERS) guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension recommended risk assessment, the number of studies reporting risk stratification has considerably increased. This systematic review aims to report and compare the variables and prognostic value of the various risk stratification models for outcome prediction in adult and pediatric PAH. METHODS: A systematic search with terms related to PAH, pediatric pulmonary hypertension, and risk stratification was performed through databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to June 8, 2022. Observational studies and clinical trials on risk stratification in adult and pediatric PAH were included, excluding case reports/series, guidelines, and reviews. Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool. Data on the variables used in the models and the predictive strength of the models given by c-statistic were extracted from eligible studies. RESULTS: A total of 74 studies were eligible for inclusion, with this review focusing on model development (n = 21), model validation (n = 13), and model enhancement (n = 9). The variables used most often in current risk stratification models were the non-invasive WHO functional class, 6-minute walk distance and BNP/NT-proBNP, and the invasive mean right atrial pressure, cardiac index and mixed venous oxygen saturation. C-statistics of current risk stratification models range from 0.56 to 0.83 in adults and from 0.69 to 0.78 in children (only two studies available). Risk stratification models focusing solely on echocardiographic parameters or biomarkers have also been reported. CONCLUSION: Studies reporting risk stratification in pediatric PAH are scarce. This systematic review provides an overview of current data on risk stratification models and its value for guiding treatment strategies in PAH. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022316885], identifier [CRD42022316885]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9684185/ /pubmed/36440049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1035453 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lokhorst, van der Werf, Berger and Douwes. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Lokhorst, Chantal
van der Werf, Sjoukje
Berger, Rolf M. F.
Douwes, Johannes M.
Risk stratification in adult and pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review
title Risk stratification in adult and pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review
title_full Risk stratification in adult and pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review
title_fullStr Risk stratification in adult and pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Risk stratification in adult and pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review
title_short Risk stratification in adult and pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review
title_sort risk stratification in adult and pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36440049
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1035453
work_keys_str_mv AT lokhorstchantal riskstratificationinadultandpediatricpulmonaryarterialhypertensionasystematicreview
AT vanderwerfsjoukje riskstratificationinadultandpediatricpulmonaryarterialhypertensionasystematicreview
AT bergerrolfmf riskstratificationinadultandpediatricpulmonaryarterialhypertensionasystematicreview
AT douwesjohannesm riskstratificationinadultandpediatricpulmonaryarterialhypertensionasystematicreview