Cargando…
How should the respiration rate be counted in cattle?
Respiration rate (RR) is a proficient indicator to measure the health status of cattle. The common method of measurement is to count the number of respiratory cycles each minute based on flank movements. However, there is no consistent method of execution. In previous studies, various methods have b...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35976483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11259-022-09984-7 |
_version_ | 1784835241191407616 |
---|---|
author | Dißmann, L. Heinicke, J. Jensen, K. C. Amon, T. Hoffmann, G. |
author_facet | Dißmann, L. Heinicke, J. Jensen, K. C. Amon, T. Hoffmann, G. |
author_sort | Dißmann, L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Respiration rate (RR) is a proficient indicator to measure the health status of cattle. The common method of measurement is to count the number of respiratory cycles each minute based on flank movements. However, there is no consistent method of execution. In previous studies, various methods have been described, including counting flank movements for 15 s, 30 s or 60 s as well as stopping the time for 5 or 10 breaths. We assume that the accuracy of the aforementioned methods differs. Therefore, we compared their precision with an RR sensor, which was used as the reference method in this study. Five scientists from the fields of agricultural science and veterinary medicine quantified the flank movement according to each of the five methods mentioned above. The results showed that with an average RR of 30 breaths per minute (bpm), all methods showed a high correlation to the values of the RR sensor. However, counting breaths for 60 s had the highest level of conformity with the RR sensor (Lin`s concordance correlation coefficient: 0.96) regardless of the level of RR. With rising RR, the inaccuracy increased significantly for the other four investigated methods, especially when counting 5 and 10 breaths. Therefore, we would recommend that counting for 60 s should be used as the standard method for future studies due to its high precision regardless of the level of RR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9684242 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96842422022-11-25 How should the respiration rate be counted in cattle? Dißmann, L. Heinicke, J. Jensen, K. C. Amon, T. Hoffmann, G. Vet Res Commun Research Respiration rate (RR) is a proficient indicator to measure the health status of cattle. The common method of measurement is to count the number of respiratory cycles each minute based on flank movements. However, there is no consistent method of execution. In previous studies, various methods have been described, including counting flank movements for 15 s, 30 s or 60 s as well as stopping the time for 5 or 10 breaths. We assume that the accuracy of the aforementioned methods differs. Therefore, we compared their precision with an RR sensor, which was used as the reference method in this study. Five scientists from the fields of agricultural science and veterinary medicine quantified the flank movement according to each of the five methods mentioned above. The results showed that with an average RR of 30 breaths per minute (bpm), all methods showed a high correlation to the values of the RR sensor. However, counting breaths for 60 s had the highest level of conformity with the RR sensor (Lin`s concordance correlation coefficient: 0.96) regardless of the level of RR. With rising RR, the inaccuracy increased significantly for the other four investigated methods, especially when counting 5 and 10 breaths. Therefore, we would recommend that counting for 60 s should be used as the standard method for future studies due to its high precision regardless of the level of RR. Springer Netherlands 2022-08-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9684242/ /pubmed/35976483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11259-022-09984-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Dißmann, L. Heinicke, J. Jensen, K. C. Amon, T. Hoffmann, G. How should the respiration rate be counted in cattle? |
title | How should the respiration rate be counted in cattle? |
title_full | How should the respiration rate be counted in cattle? |
title_fullStr | How should the respiration rate be counted in cattle? |
title_full_unstemmed | How should the respiration rate be counted in cattle? |
title_short | How should the respiration rate be counted in cattle? |
title_sort | how should the respiration rate be counted in cattle? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35976483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11259-022-09984-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dißmannl howshouldtherespirationratebecountedincattle AT heinickej howshouldtherespirationratebecountedincattle AT jensenkc howshouldtherespirationratebecountedincattle AT amont howshouldtherespirationratebecountedincattle AT hoffmanng howshouldtherespirationratebecountedincattle |