Cargando…

How should the respiration rate be counted in cattle?

Respiration rate (RR) is a proficient indicator to measure the health status of cattle. The common method of measurement is to count the number of respiratory cycles each minute based on flank movements. However, there is no consistent method of execution. In previous studies, various methods have b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dißmann, L., Heinicke, J., Jensen, K. C., Amon, T., Hoffmann, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35976483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11259-022-09984-7
_version_ 1784835241191407616
author Dißmann, L.
Heinicke, J.
Jensen, K. C.
Amon, T.
Hoffmann, G.
author_facet Dißmann, L.
Heinicke, J.
Jensen, K. C.
Amon, T.
Hoffmann, G.
author_sort Dißmann, L.
collection PubMed
description Respiration rate (RR) is a proficient indicator to measure the health status of cattle. The common method of measurement is to count the number of respiratory cycles each minute based on flank movements. However, there is no consistent method of execution. In previous studies, various methods have been described, including counting flank movements for 15 s, 30 s or 60 s as well as stopping the time for 5 or 10 breaths. We assume that the accuracy of the aforementioned methods differs. Therefore, we compared their precision with an RR sensor, which was used as the reference method in this study. Five scientists from the fields of agricultural science and veterinary medicine quantified the flank movement according to each of the five methods mentioned above. The results showed that with an average RR of 30 breaths per minute (bpm), all methods showed a high correlation to the values of the RR sensor. However, counting breaths for 60 s had the highest level of conformity with the RR sensor (Lin`s concordance correlation coefficient: 0.96) regardless of the level of RR. With rising RR, the inaccuracy increased significantly for the other four investigated methods, especially when counting 5 and 10 breaths. Therefore, we would recommend that counting for 60 s should be used as the standard method for future studies due to its high precision regardless of the level of RR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9684242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96842422022-11-25 How should the respiration rate be counted in cattle? Dißmann, L. Heinicke, J. Jensen, K. C. Amon, T. Hoffmann, G. Vet Res Commun Research Respiration rate (RR) is a proficient indicator to measure the health status of cattle. The common method of measurement is to count the number of respiratory cycles each minute based on flank movements. However, there is no consistent method of execution. In previous studies, various methods have been described, including counting flank movements for 15 s, 30 s or 60 s as well as stopping the time for 5 or 10 breaths. We assume that the accuracy of the aforementioned methods differs. Therefore, we compared their precision with an RR sensor, which was used as the reference method in this study. Five scientists from the fields of agricultural science and veterinary medicine quantified the flank movement according to each of the five methods mentioned above. The results showed that with an average RR of 30 breaths per minute (bpm), all methods showed a high correlation to the values of the RR sensor. However, counting breaths for 60 s had the highest level of conformity with the RR sensor (Lin`s concordance correlation coefficient: 0.96) regardless of the level of RR. With rising RR, the inaccuracy increased significantly for the other four investigated methods, especially when counting 5 and 10 breaths. Therefore, we would recommend that counting for 60 s should be used as the standard method for future studies due to its high precision regardless of the level of RR. Springer Netherlands 2022-08-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9684242/ /pubmed/35976483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11259-022-09984-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Dißmann, L.
Heinicke, J.
Jensen, K. C.
Amon, T.
Hoffmann, G.
How should the respiration rate be counted in cattle?
title How should the respiration rate be counted in cattle?
title_full How should the respiration rate be counted in cattle?
title_fullStr How should the respiration rate be counted in cattle?
title_full_unstemmed How should the respiration rate be counted in cattle?
title_short How should the respiration rate be counted in cattle?
title_sort how should the respiration rate be counted in cattle?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35976483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11259-022-09984-7
work_keys_str_mv AT dißmannl howshouldtherespirationratebecountedincattle
AT heinickej howshouldtherespirationratebecountedincattle
AT jensenkc howshouldtherespirationratebecountedincattle
AT amont howshouldtherespirationratebecountedincattle
AT hoffmanng howshouldtherespirationratebecountedincattle