Cargando…

Justification of CT practices across Europe: results of a survey of national competent authorities and radiology societies

OBJECTIVES: Published literature on justification of computed tomography (CT) examinations in Europe is sparse but demonstrates consistent sub-optimal application. As part of the EU initiated CT justification project, this work set out to capture CT justification practices across Europe. METHODS: An...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foley, Shane J., Bly, Ritva, Brady, Adrian P., Ebdon-Jackson, Steve, Karoussou-Schreiner, Alexandra, Hierath, Monika, Sosna, Jacob, Brkljačić, Boris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36417017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01325-1
_version_ 1784835269232427008
author Foley, Shane J.
Bly, Ritva
Brady, Adrian P.
Ebdon-Jackson, Steve
Karoussou-Schreiner, Alexandra
Hierath, Monika
Sosna, Jacob
Brkljačić, Boris
author_facet Foley, Shane J.
Bly, Ritva
Brady, Adrian P.
Ebdon-Jackson, Steve
Karoussou-Schreiner, Alexandra
Hierath, Monika
Sosna, Jacob
Brkljačić, Boris
author_sort Foley, Shane J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Published literature on justification of computed tomography (CT) examinations in Europe is sparse but demonstrates consistent sub-optimal application. As part of the EU initiated CT justification project, this work set out to capture CT justification practices across Europe. METHODS: An electronic questionnaire consisting of mostly closed multiple-choice questions was distributed to national competent authorities and to presidents of European radiology societies in EU member states as well as Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, and the UK (n = 31). RESULTS: Fifty-one results were received from 30 European countries. Just 47% (n = 24) stated that advance justification of individual CT examinations is performed by a medical practitioner. Radiologists alone mostly (n = 27, 53%) perform daily justification of CT referrals although this is a shared responsibility in many countries. Imaging referral guidelines are widely available although just 13% (n = 6) consider them in daily use. Four countries (Cyprus, Ireland, Sweden, UK) reported having them embedded within clinical decision support systems. Justification of new practices with CT is mostly regulated (77%) although three countries (Belgium, Iceland and Portugal) reported not having any national system in place for generic justification. Health screening with CT was reported by seven countries as part of approved screening programmes and by eight countries outside. When performed, CT justification audits were reported to improve CT justification rates. CONCLUSIONS: CT justification practices vary across Europe with less than 50% using advance justification and a minority having clinical decision support systems in place. CT for health screening purposes is not currently widely used in Europe. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-022-01325-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9684387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96843872022-11-25 Justification of CT practices across Europe: results of a survey of national competent authorities and radiology societies Foley, Shane J. Bly, Ritva Brady, Adrian P. Ebdon-Jackson, Steve Karoussou-Schreiner, Alexandra Hierath, Monika Sosna, Jacob Brkljačić, Boris Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: Published literature on justification of computed tomography (CT) examinations in Europe is sparse but demonstrates consistent sub-optimal application. As part of the EU initiated CT justification project, this work set out to capture CT justification practices across Europe. METHODS: An electronic questionnaire consisting of mostly closed multiple-choice questions was distributed to national competent authorities and to presidents of European radiology societies in EU member states as well as Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, and the UK (n = 31). RESULTS: Fifty-one results were received from 30 European countries. Just 47% (n = 24) stated that advance justification of individual CT examinations is performed by a medical practitioner. Radiologists alone mostly (n = 27, 53%) perform daily justification of CT referrals although this is a shared responsibility in many countries. Imaging referral guidelines are widely available although just 13% (n = 6) consider them in daily use. Four countries (Cyprus, Ireland, Sweden, UK) reported having them embedded within clinical decision support systems. Justification of new practices with CT is mostly regulated (77%) although three countries (Belgium, Iceland and Portugal) reported not having any national system in place for generic justification. Health screening with CT was reported by seven countries as part of approved screening programmes and by eight countries outside. When performed, CT justification audits were reported to improve CT justification rates. CONCLUSIONS: CT justification practices vary across Europe with less than 50% using advance justification and a minority having clinical decision support systems in place. CT for health screening purposes is not currently widely used in Europe. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-022-01325-1. Springer Vienna 2022-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9684387/ /pubmed/36417017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01325-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Foley, Shane J.
Bly, Ritva
Brady, Adrian P.
Ebdon-Jackson, Steve
Karoussou-Schreiner, Alexandra
Hierath, Monika
Sosna, Jacob
Brkljačić, Boris
Justification of CT practices across Europe: results of a survey of national competent authorities and radiology societies
title Justification of CT practices across Europe: results of a survey of national competent authorities and radiology societies
title_full Justification of CT practices across Europe: results of a survey of national competent authorities and radiology societies
title_fullStr Justification of CT practices across Europe: results of a survey of national competent authorities and radiology societies
title_full_unstemmed Justification of CT practices across Europe: results of a survey of national competent authorities and radiology societies
title_short Justification of CT practices across Europe: results of a survey of national competent authorities and radiology societies
title_sort justification of ct practices across europe: results of a survey of national competent authorities and radiology societies
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36417017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01325-1
work_keys_str_mv AT foleyshanej justificationofctpracticesacrosseuroperesultsofasurveyofnationalcompetentauthoritiesandradiologysocieties
AT blyritva justificationofctpracticesacrosseuroperesultsofasurveyofnationalcompetentauthoritiesandradiologysocieties
AT bradyadrianp justificationofctpracticesacrosseuroperesultsofasurveyofnationalcompetentauthoritiesandradiologysocieties
AT ebdonjacksonsteve justificationofctpracticesacrosseuroperesultsofasurveyofnationalcompetentauthoritiesandradiologysocieties
AT karoussouschreineralexandra justificationofctpracticesacrosseuroperesultsofasurveyofnationalcompetentauthoritiesandradiologysocieties
AT hierathmonika justificationofctpracticesacrosseuroperesultsofasurveyofnationalcompetentauthoritiesandradiologysocieties
AT sosnajacob justificationofctpracticesacrosseuroperesultsofasurveyofnationalcompetentauthoritiesandradiologysocieties
AT justificationofctpracticesacrosseuroperesultsofasurveyofnationalcompetentauthoritiesandradiologysocieties
AT brkljacicboris justificationofctpracticesacrosseuroperesultsofasurveyofnationalcompetentauthoritiesandradiologysocieties