Cargando…

Value of texture analysis based on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE: Accurate preoperative assessment of extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) is critical for the treatment and prognosis of rectal cancer. The aim of our research was to develop an assessment model by texture analysis for preoperative prediction of EMVI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study enrol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fang, Junjie, Sun, Wei, Wu, Dan, Pang, Peipei, Guo, Xiuyu, Yu, Chunyao, Lu, Wei, Tang, Guangyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36417020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01316-2
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Accurate preoperative assessment of extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) is critical for the treatment and prognosis of rectal cancer. The aim of our research was to develop an assessment model by texture analysis for preoperative prediction of EMVI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study enrolled 44 rectal patients as train cohort, 7 patients as validation cohort and 18 patients as test cohort. A total of 236 texture features from DCE MR imaging quantitative parameters were extracted for each patient (59 features of K(trans), K(ep), V(e) and V(p)), and key features were selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO). Finally, clinical independent risk factors, conventional MRI assessment, and T-score were incorporated to construct an assessment model using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The T-score calculated using the 4 selected key features were significantly correlated with EMVI (p < 0.010). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.797 for discriminating between EMVI-positive and EMVI-negative patients with a sensitivity of 88.2% and specificity of 70.4%. The conventional MRI assessment of EMVI had a sensitivity of 23.53% and a specificity of 96.30%. The assessment model showed a greatly improved performance with an AUC of 0.954 (sensitivity, 88.2%; specificity, 92.6%) in train cohort, 0.833 (sensitivity, 66.7%; specificity, 100%) in validation cohort and 0.877 in test cohort, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment model showed an excellent performance in preoperative assessment of EMVI. It demonstrates strong potential for improving the accuracy of EMVI assessment and provide a reliable basis for individualized treatment decisions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-022-01316-2.