Cargando…
Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry correcting equations
In order to investigate the reliability of correcting GAT formulas in comparison with dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), this study included 112 right eyes of 112 healthy subjects aged from 21 to 77 years, whose eyes underwent to a full ophthalmologic exam. IOP was measured in each eye with DCT and th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36418360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24318-y |
_version_ | 1784835318881452032 |
---|---|
author | De Bernardo, Maddalena Casaburi, Claudia De Pascale, Ilaria Capasso, Luigi Cione, Ferdinando Rosa, Nicola |
author_facet | De Bernardo, Maddalena Casaburi, Claudia De Pascale, Ilaria Capasso, Luigi Cione, Ferdinando Rosa, Nicola |
author_sort | De Bernardo, Maddalena |
collection | PubMed |
description | In order to investigate the reliability of correcting GAT formulas in comparison with dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), this study included 112 right eyes of 112 healthy subjects aged from 21 to 77 years, whose eyes underwent to a full ophthalmologic exam. IOP was measured in each eye with DCT and then with GAT. IOP values obtained with GAT were corrected with 10 equations and then compared with those provided by DCT. Participants mean age was 42.24 ± 14.08 years; mean IOP measured with DCT was 17.61 ± 2.87 and 15.50 ± 2.47 mmHg, measured with GAT. The mean discordance between DCT and GAT measurements was 2.11 ± 2.24 mmHg. All the correcting formulas, but Srodka one (p ˂ 0.001), tend to increase the difference between GAT and DCT. According to these results Śródka equation provides the best correction, reducing the difference between the two IOP measurement methods of − 0.03 ± 0.85 mmHg. Other equations do not provide a valid improvement of the agreement between the two methods or they provide a worsening of the agreement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9684577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96845772022-11-25 Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry correcting equations De Bernardo, Maddalena Casaburi, Claudia De Pascale, Ilaria Capasso, Luigi Cione, Ferdinando Rosa, Nicola Sci Rep Article In order to investigate the reliability of correcting GAT formulas in comparison with dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), this study included 112 right eyes of 112 healthy subjects aged from 21 to 77 years, whose eyes underwent to a full ophthalmologic exam. IOP was measured in each eye with DCT and then with GAT. IOP values obtained with GAT were corrected with 10 equations and then compared with those provided by DCT. Participants mean age was 42.24 ± 14.08 years; mean IOP measured with DCT was 17.61 ± 2.87 and 15.50 ± 2.47 mmHg, measured with GAT. The mean discordance between DCT and GAT measurements was 2.11 ± 2.24 mmHg. All the correcting formulas, but Srodka one (p ˂ 0.001), tend to increase the difference between GAT and DCT. According to these results Śródka equation provides the best correction, reducing the difference between the two IOP measurement methods of − 0.03 ± 0.85 mmHg. Other equations do not provide a valid improvement of the agreement between the two methods or they provide a worsening of the agreement. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9684577/ /pubmed/36418360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24318-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article De Bernardo, Maddalena Casaburi, Claudia De Pascale, Ilaria Capasso, Luigi Cione, Ferdinando Rosa, Nicola Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry correcting equations |
title | Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry correcting equations |
title_full | Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry correcting equations |
title_fullStr | Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry correcting equations |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry correcting equations |
title_short | Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry correcting equations |
title_sort | comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry correcting equations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36418360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24318-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT debernardomaddalena comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometrycorrectingequations AT casaburiclaudia comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometrycorrectingequations AT depascaleilaria comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometrycorrectingequations AT capassoluigi comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometrycorrectingequations AT cioneferdinando comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometrycorrectingequations AT rosanicola comparisonbetweendynamiccontourtonometryandgoldmannapplanationtonometrycorrectingequations |