Cargando…

The Reliability and Acceptability of RDx-Based Tele-Controlled Subjective Refraction Compared with Traditional Subjective Refraction

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability and acceptability of tele-controlled subjective refraction supported by RDx, a new technique that involves optical software designed for controlling phoropters remotely, to traditional subjective refraction. METHODS: Sixty-five partic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Jie, Li, Xiaoning, Yan, Tao, Wen, Longbo, Pan, Lun, Yang, Zhikuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36394842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.11.16
_version_ 1784835329398669312
author Huang, Jie
Li, Xiaoning
Yan, Tao
Wen, Longbo
Pan, Lun
Yang, Zhikuan
author_facet Huang, Jie
Li, Xiaoning
Yan, Tao
Wen, Longbo
Pan, Lun
Yang, Zhikuan
author_sort Huang, Jie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability and acceptability of tele-controlled subjective refraction supported by RDx, a new technique that involves optical software designed for controlling phoropters remotely, to traditional subjective refraction. METHODS: Sixty-five participants underwent tele-controlled subjective refraction and traditional subjective refraction randomly and nine of them underwent the second tele-controlled subjective refraction measurement on the same day. After their examinations, we distributed a validated satisfaction questionnaire to each participant. The elapsed time taken for refraction, sphere (S), cylinder (C), spherical equivalent (SE), vertical and oblique cylindrical vectors (J(0) and J(45)), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were compared. Age and refractive error type were included as covariates. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement between both methods of refraction. RESULTS: The mean age was 20.5 ± 5.9 years for all participants (aged 9 to 40 years); 57% were female participants. The repeatability analysis of tele-controlled method showed no significant differences for all parameters (P > 0.05). We found no statistical differences (P > 0.05) between tele-controlled subjective refraction and traditional subjective refraction for all parameters in either group. The mean difference and 95% limits of agreement for SE, J(0), and J(45) were −0.03 ± 0.36 diopters (D), −0.00 ± 0.57 D, and −0.01 ± 0.79 D, respectively. The tele-controlled method took more time to perform than the traditional one (P < 0.05). Completed questionnaires were returned by 55 participants (85%), and they showed high satisfaction and acceptance of the tele-controlled method (98%). CONCLUSIONS: Tele-controlled subjective refraction results agreed with traditional subjective refraction for all refraction components except for cylinder vectors. In addition, the broad acceptability of tele-controlled subjective refraction means practicability in clinical practice. TRANSLATION RELEVANCE: The RDx-based tele-controlled method can provide an alternative to subjective refraction, especially in areas that lack experienced optometrists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9684619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96846192022-11-25 The Reliability and Acceptability of RDx-Based Tele-Controlled Subjective Refraction Compared with Traditional Subjective Refraction Huang, Jie Li, Xiaoning Yan, Tao Wen, Longbo Pan, Lun Yang, Zhikuan Transl Vis Sci Technol Refractive Intervention PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability and acceptability of tele-controlled subjective refraction supported by RDx, a new technique that involves optical software designed for controlling phoropters remotely, to traditional subjective refraction. METHODS: Sixty-five participants underwent tele-controlled subjective refraction and traditional subjective refraction randomly and nine of them underwent the second tele-controlled subjective refraction measurement on the same day. After their examinations, we distributed a validated satisfaction questionnaire to each participant. The elapsed time taken for refraction, sphere (S), cylinder (C), spherical equivalent (SE), vertical and oblique cylindrical vectors (J(0) and J(45)), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were compared. Age and refractive error type were included as covariates. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement between both methods of refraction. RESULTS: The mean age was 20.5 ± 5.9 years for all participants (aged 9 to 40 years); 57% were female participants. The repeatability analysis of tele-controlled method showed no significant differences for all parameters (P > 0.05). We found no statistical differences (P > 0.05) between tele-controlled subjective refraction and traditional subjective refraction for all parameters in either group. The mean difference and 95% limits of agreement for SE, J(0), and J(45) were −0.03 ± 0.36 diopters (D), −0.00 ± 0.57 D, and −0.01 ± 0.79 D, respectively. The tele-controlled method took more time to perform than the traditional one (P < 0.05). Completed questionnaires were returned by 55 participants (85%), and they showed high satisfaction and acceptance of the tele-controlled method (98%). CONCLUSIONS: Tele-controlled subjective refraction results agreed with traditional subjective refraction for all refraction components except for cylinder vectors. In addition, the broad acceptability of tele-controlled subjective refraction means practicability in clinical practice. TRANSLATION RELEVANCE: The RDx-based tele-controlled method can provide an alternative to subjective refraction, especially in areas that lack experienced optometrists. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9684619/ /pubmed/36394842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.11.16 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Refractive Intervention
Huang, Jie
Li, Xiaoning
Yan, Tao
Wen, Longbo
Pan, Lun
Yang, Zhikuan
The Reliability and Acceptability of RDx-Based Tele-Controlled Subjective Refraction Compared with Traditional Subjective Refraction
title The Reliability and Acceptability of RDx-Based Tele-Controlled Subjective Refraction Compared with Traditional Subjective Refraction
title_full The Reliability and Acceptability of RDx-Based Tele-Controlled Subjective Refraction Compared with Traditional Subjective Refraction
title_fullStr The Reliability and Acceptability of RDx-Based Tele-Controlled Subjective Refraction Compared with Traditional Subjective Refraction
title_full_unstemmed The Reliability and Acceptability of RDx-Based Tele-Controlled Subjective Refraction Compared with Traditional Subjective Refraction
title_short The Reliability and Acceptability of RDx-Based Tele-Controlled Subjective Refraction Compared with Traditional Subjective Refraction
title_sort reliability and acceptability of rdx-based tele-controlled subjective refraction compared with traditional subjective refraction
topic Refractive Intervention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36394842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.11.16
work_keys_str_mv AT huangjie thereliabilityandacceptabilityofrdxbasedtelecontrolledsubjectiverefractioncomparedwithtraditionalsubjectiverefraction
AT lixiaoning thereliabilityandacceptabilityofrdxbasedtelecontrolledsubjectiverefractioncomparedwithtraditionalsubjectiverefraction
AT yantao thereliabilityandacceptabilityofrdxbasedtelecontrolledsubjectiverefractioncomparedwithtraditionalsubjectiverefraction
AT wenlongbo thereliabilityandacceptabilityofrdxbasedtelecontrolledsubjectiverefractioncomparedwithtraditionalsubjectiverefraction
AT panlun thereliabilityandacceptabilityofrdxbasedtelecontrolledsubjectiverefractioncomparedwithtraditionalsubjectiverefraction
AT yangzhikuan thereliabilityandacceptabilityofrdxbasedtelecontrolledsubjectiverefractioncomparedwithtraditionalsubjectiverefraction
AT huangjie reliabilityandacceptabilityofrdxbasedtelecontrolledsubjectiverefractioncomparedwithtraditionalsubjectiverefraction
AT lixiaoning reliabilityandacceptabilityofrdxbasedtelecontrolledsubjectiverefractioncomparedwithtraditionalsubjectiverefraction
AT yantao reliabilityandacceptabilityofrdxbasedtelecontrolledsubjectiverefractioncomparedwithtraditionalsubjectiverefraction
AT wenlongbo reliabilityandacceptabilityofrdxbasedtelecontrolledsubjectiverefractioncomparedwithtraditionalsubjectiverefraction
AT panlun reliabilityandacceptabilityofrdxbasedtelecontrolledsubjectiverefractioncomparedwithtraditionalsubjectiverefraction
AT yangzhikuan reliabilityandacceptabilityofrdxbasedtelecontrolledsubjectiverefractioncomparedwithtraditionalsubjectiverefraction