Cargando…
Rolle, Arbeitsweise und Empfehlungen der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO) im Kontext der COVID-19-Pandemie
The Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) is a voluntary body whose 18 experts are appointed by the Federal Ministry of Health. The scientific work of STIKO is supported by a scientific secretariat at the Robert Koch Institute. The STIKO develops independent vaccination recommendations for Germa...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36416888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-022-03610-2 |
_version_ | 1784835361680130048 |
---|---|
author | Vygen-Bonnet, Sabine Schlaberg, Johanna Koch, Judith |
author_facet | Vygen-Bonnet, Sabine Schlaberg, Johanna Koch, Judith |
author_sort | Vygen-Bonnet, Sabine |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) is a voluntary body whose 18 experts are appointed by the Federal Ministry of Health. The scientific work of STIKO is supported by a scientific secretariat at the Robert Koch Institute. The STIKO develops independent vaccination recommendations for Germany using the methodology of evidence-based medicine (EBM). During the COVID-19 pandemic, STIKO faced major challenges. Several COVID-19 vaccines based on new technologies were approved within a very short time. The benefit–risk assessment had to be carried out according to the current state of knowledge. The vaccination recommendations had to be continuously adapted to the constantly changing epidemiology of SARS-CoV‑2, increasing vaccine availability, new approvals, extensions of indications, and safety signals of vaccines. STIKO has adapted its way of working to the situation; the experts showed an impressive commitment during the pandemic. Even under time pressure, STIKO adhered to the principles of EBM and developed evidence-based vaccination recommendations. Before the final decision was made, STIKO submitted every vaccination recommendation to a commenting procedure with the stakeholders (e.g., medical societies and health authorities). Despite the short deadlines, the stakeholders made extensive and constructive comments and gave STIKO the opportunity to discuss and adapt their recommendations, consider the feedback, and thus build on a broad consensus. The past few months have shown that it is possible and rational to developing vaccination recommendations based on the principles of EBM even during a pandemic. Sufficient human resources in the STIKO office are essential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9684750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96847502022-11-28 Rolle, Arbeitsweise und Empfehlungen der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO) im Kontext der COVID-19-Pandemie Vygen-Bonnet, Sabine Schlaberg, Johanna Koch, Judith Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz Leitthema The Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) is a voluntary body whose 18 experts are appointed by the Federal Ministry of Health. The scientific work of STIKO is supported by a scientific secretariat at the Robert Koch Institute. The STIKO develops independent vaccination recommendations for Germany using the methodology of evidence-based medicine (EBM). During the COVID-19 pandemic, STIKO faced major challenges. Several COVID-19 vaccines based on new technologies were approved within a very short time. The benefit–risk assessment had to be carried out according to the current state of knowledge. The vaccination recommendations had to be continuously adapted to the constantly changing epidemiology of SARS-CoV‑2, increasing vaccine availability, new approvals, extensions of indications, and safety signals of vaccines. STIKO has adapted its way of working to the situation; the experts showed an impressive commitment during the pandemic. Even under time pressure, STIKO adhered to the principles of EBM and developed evidence-based vaccination recommendations. Before the final decision was made, STIKO submitted every vaccination recommendation to a commenting procedure with the stakeholders (e.g., medical societies and health authorities). Despite the short deadlines, the stakeholders made extensive and constructive comments and gave STIKO the opportunity to discuss and adapt their recommendations, consider the feedback, and thus build on a broad consensus. The past few months have shown that it is possible and rational to developing vaccination recommendations based on the principles of EBM even during a pandemic. Sufficient human resources in the STIKO office are essential. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9684750/ /pubmed/36416888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-022-03610-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Leitthema Vygen-Bonnet, Sabine Schlaberg, Johanna Koch, Judith Rolle, Arbeitsweise und Empfehlungen der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO) im Kontext der COVID-19-Pandemie |
title | Rolle, Arbeitsweise und Empfehlungen der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO) im Kontext der COVID-19-Pandemie |
title_full | Rolle, Arbeitsweise und Empfehlungen der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO) im Kontext der COVID-19-Pandemie |
title_fullStr | Rolle, Arbeitsweise und Empfehlungen der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO) im Kontext der COVID-19-Pandemie |
title_full_unstemmed | Rolle, Arbeitsweise und Empfehlungen der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO) im Kontext der COVID-19-Pandemie |
title_short | Rolle, Arbeitsweise und Empfehlungen der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO) im Kontext der COVID-19-Pandemie |
title_sort | rolle, arbeitsweise und empfehlungen der ständigen impfkommission (stiko) im kontext der covid-19-pandemie |
topic | Leitthema |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36416888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-022-03610-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vygenbonnetsabine rollearbeitsweiseundempfehlungenderstandigenimpfkommissionstikoimkontextdercovid19pandemie AT schlabergjohanna rollearbeitsweiseundempfehlungenderstandigenimpfkommissionstikoimkontextdercovid19pandemie AT kochjudith rollearbeitsweiseundempfehlungenderstandigenimpfkommissionstikoimkontextdercovid19pandemie |