Cargando…
Differences among reciprocal hybrids of Labeotropheus
Current evidence suggests that hybridization played a crucial role in the early evolution and diversification of the species flocks of cichlid fishes in the African Great Lakes. Nonetheless, evidence for hybridization in the extant cichlid fauna is scant, suggesting that hybridization is rare in the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36466299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-05092-4 |
_version_ | 1784835378841124864 |
---|---|
author | Pauers, Michael J. Hoffmann, Jacob Ackley, Leah Jiang-Bo |
author_facet | Pauers, Michael J. Hoffmann, Jacob Ackley, Leah Jiang-Bo |
author_sort | Pauers, Michael J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current evidence suggests that hybridization played a crucial role in the early evolution and diversification of the species flocks of cichlid fishes in the African Great Lakes. Nonetheless, evidence for hybridization in the extant cichlid fauna is scant, suggesting that hybridization is rare in the modern era, perhaps enforced by natural or sexual selection acting against F1 hybrids. Additionally, most experimental studies of hybridization perform a hybrid cross in one direction, ignoring the reciprocal hybrid. In this study, we perform reciprocal crosses between sympatric congeners from Lake Malaŵi, Labeotropheus fuelleborni and L. trewavasae, in order to compare the body shape and coloration of males of both of these hybrids, as well as to examine how these hybrids fare during both inter- and intrasexual interactions. We found that L. trewavasae-sired hybrid males are intermediate to the parental species both morphologically and chromatically, while the reciprocal L. fuelleborni-sired hybrids are likely transgressive hybrids. Males of these transgressive hybrids also fare poorly during our mate choice experiments. While female L. trewavasae reject them as possible mates, male L. trewavasae do not make a distinction between them and conspecific males. Selection against transgressive F1 hybrids as observed in our crossing experiments may help explain why contemporary hybridization in Lake Malaŵi cichlids appears to be rare. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10750-022-05092-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9684848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96848482022-11-28 Differences among reciprocal hybrids of Labeotropheus Pauers, Michael J. Hoffmann, Jacob Ackley, Leah Jiang-Bo Hydrobiologia Advances in Cichlid Research V Current evidence suggests that hybridization played a crucial role in the early evolution and diversification of the species flocks of cichlid fishes in the African Great Lakes. Nonetheless, evidence for hybridization in the extant cichlid fauna is scant, suggesting that hybridization is rare in the modern era, perhaps enforced by natural or sexual selection acting against F1 hybrids. Additionally, most experimental studies of hybridization perform a hybrid cross in one direction, ignoring the reciprocal hybrid. In this study, we perform reciprocal crosses between sympatric congeners from Lake Malaŵi, Labeotropheus fuelleborni and L. trewavasae, in order to compare the body shape and coloration of males of both of these hybrids, as well as to examine how these hybrids fare during both inter- and intrasexual interactions. We found that L. trewavasae-sired hybrid males are intermediate to the parental species both morphologically and chromatically, while the reciprocal L. fuelleborni-sired hybrids are likely transgressive hybrids. Males of these transgressive hybrids also fare poorly during our mate choice experiments. While female L. trewavasae reject them as possible mates, male L. trewavasae do not make a distinction between them and conspecific males. Selection against transgressive F1 hybrids as observed in our crossing experiments may help explain why contemporary hybridization in Lake Malaŵi cichlids appears to be rare. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10750-022-05092-4. Springer International Publishing 2022-11-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9684848/ /pubmed/36466299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-05092-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Advances in Cichlid Research V Pauers, Michael J. Hoffmann, Jacob Ackley, Leah Jiang-Bo Differences among reciprocal hybrids of Labeotropheus |
title | Differences among reciprocal hybrids of Labeotropheus |
title_full | Differences among reciprocal hybrids of Labeotropheus |
title_fullStr | Differences among reciprocal hybrids of Labeotropheus |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences among reciprocal hybrids of Labeotropheus |
title_short | Differences among reciprocal hybrids of Labeotropheus |
title_sort | differences among reciprocal hybrids of labeotropheus |
topic | Advances in Cichlid Research V |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36466299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-05092-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pauersmichaelj differencesamongreciprocalhybridsoflabeotropheus AT hoffmannjacob differencesamongreciprocalhybridsoflabeotropheus AT ackleyleahjiangbo differencesamongreciprocalhybridsoflabeotropheus |