Cargando…
Special Issue Introduction: The GLES Open Science Challenge 2021: A Pilot Project on the Applicability of Registered Reports in Quantitative Political Science
The GLES Open Science Challenge 2021 was a pioneering initiative in quantitative political science. Aimed at increasing the adoption of replicable and transparent research practices, it led to this special issue. The project combined the rigor of registered reports—a new publication format in which...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36465715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11615-022-00436-0 |
_version_ | 1784835404096077824 |
---|---|
author | Bucher, Hannah Stroppe, Anne-Kathrin Burger, Axel M. Faas, Thorsten Schoen, Harald Debus, Marc Roßteutscher, Sigrid |
author_facet | Bucher, Hannah Stroppe, Anne-Kathrin Burger, Axel M. Faas, Thorsten Schoen, Harald Debus, Marc Roßteutscher, Sigrid |
author_sort | Bucher, Hannah |
collection | PubMed |
description | The GLES Open Science Challenge 2021 was a pioneering initiative in quantitative political science. Aimed at increasing the adoption of replicable and transparent research practices, it led to this special issue. The project combined the rigor of registered reports—a new publication format in which studies are evaluated prior to data collection/access and analysis—with quantitative political science research in the context of the 2021 German federal election. This special issue, which features the registered reports that resulted from the project, shows that transparent research following open science principles benefits our discipline and substantially contributes to quantitative political science. In this introduction to the special issue, we first elaborate on why more transparent research practices are necessary to guarantee the cumulative progress of scientific knowledge. We then show how registered reports can contribute to increasing the transparency of scientific practices. Next, we discuss the application of open science practices in quantitative political science to date. And finally, we present the process and schedule of the GLES Open Science Challenge and give an overview of the contributions included in this special issue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9684978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96849782022-11-28 Special Issue Introduction: The GLES Open Science Challenge 2021: A Pilot Project on the Applicability of Registered Reports in Quantitative Political Science Bucher, Hannah Stroppe, Anne-Kathrin Burger, Axel M. Faas, Thorsten Schoen, Harald Debus, Marc Roßteutscher, Sigrid Polit Vierteljahresschr Critical Paper The GLES Open Science Challenge 2021 was a pioneering initiative in quantitative political science. Aimed at increasing the adoption of replicable and transparent research practices, it led to this special issue. The project combined the rigor of registered reports—a new publication format in which studies are evaluated prior to data collection/access and analysis—with quantitative political science research in the context of the 2021 German federal election. This special issue, which features the registered reports that resulted from the project, shows that transparent research following open science principles benefits our discipline and substantially contributes to quantitative political science. In this introduction to the special issue, we first elaborate on why more transparent research practices are necessary to guarantee the cumulative progress of scientific knowledge. We then show how registered reports can contribute to increasing the transparency of scientific practices. Next, we discuss the application of open science practices in quantitative political science to date. And finally, we present the process and schedule of the GLES Open Science Challenge and give an overview of the contributions included in this special issue. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2022-11-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9684978/ /pubmed/36465715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11615-022-00436-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Critical Paper Bucher, Hannah Stroppe, Anne-Kathrin Burger, Axel M. Faas, Thorsten Schoen, Harald Debus, Marc Roßteutscher, Sigrid Special Issue Introduction: The GLES Open Science Challenge 2021: A Pilot Project on the Applicability of Registered Reports in Quantitative Political Science |
title | Special Issue Introduction: The GLES Open Science Challenge 2021: A Pilot Project on the Applicability of Registered Reports in Quantitative Political Science |
title_full | Special Issue Introduction: The GLES Open Science Challenge 2021: A Pilot Project on the Applicability of Registered Reports in Quantitative Political Science |
title_fullStr | Special Issue Introduction: The GLES Open Science Challenge 2021: A Pilot Project on the Applicability of Registered Reports in Quantitative Political Science |
title_full_unstemmed | Special Issue Introduction: The GLES Open Science Challenge 2021: A Pilot Project on the Applicability of Registered Reports in Quantitative Political Science |
title_short | Special Issue Introduction: The GLES Open Science Challenge 2021: A Pilot Project on the Applicability of Registered Reports in Quantitative Political Science |
title_sort | special issue introduction: the gles open science challenge 2021: a pilot project on the applicability of registered reports in quantitative political science |
topic | Critical Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36465715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11615-022-00436-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bucherhannah specialissueintroductiontheglesopensciencechallenge2021apilotprojectontheapplicabilityofregisteredreportsinquantitativepoliticalscience AT stroppeannekathrin specialissueintroductiontheglesopensciencechallenge2021apilotprojectontheapplicabilityofregisteredreportsinquantitativepoliticalscience AT burgeraxelm specialissueintroductiontheglesopensciencechallenge2021apilotprojectontheapplicabilityofregisteredreportsinquantitativepoliticalscience AT faasthorsten specialissueintroductiontheglesopensciencechallenge2021apilotprojectontheapplicabilityofregisteredreportsinquantitativepoliticalscience AT schoenharald specialissueintroductiontheglesopensciencechallenge2021apilotprojectontheapplicabilityofregisteredreportsinquantitativepoliticalscience AT debusmarc specialissueintroductiontheglesopensciencechallenge2021apilotprojectontheapplicabilityofregisteredreportsinquantitativepoliticalscience AT roßteutschersigrid specialissueintroductiontheglesopensciencechallenge2021apilotprojectontheapplicabilityofregisteredreportsinquantitativepoliticalscience |