Cargando…

Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence

Democratic theories assume that citizens have some form of political knowledge in order to vote for representatives or to directly engage in democratic deliberation and participation. However, apart from widespread attention to the phenomenon of fake news and misinformation, less attention has been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Coeckelbergh, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36466152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00239-4
_version_ 1784835420406677504
author Coeckelbergh, Mark
author_facet Coeckelbergh, Mark
author_sort Coeckelbergh, Mark
collection PubMed
description Democratic theories assume that citizens have some form of political knowledge in order to vote for representatives or to directly engage in democratic deliberation and participation. However, apart from widespread attention to the phenomenon of fake news and misinformation, less attention has been paid to how they are supposed to acquire that knowledge in contexts shaped by artificial intelligence and related digital technologies. While this topic can also be approached from an empirical angle, this paper contributes to supporting concerns about AI and democracy by looking at the issue through the lens of political epistemology, in particular using the concept of epistemic agency. It argues that artificial intelligence (AI) endangers democracy since it risks to diminish the epistemic agency of citizens and thereby undermine the relevant kind of political agency in democracy. It shows that next to fake news and manipulation by means of AI analysis of big data, epistemic bubbles and the defaulting of statistical knowledge endanger the epistemic agency of citizens when they form and wish to revise their political beliefs. AI risks to undermine trust in one’s own epistemic capacities and hinder the exercise of those capacities. If we want to protect the knowledge basis of our democracies, we must address these problems in education and technology policy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9685050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96850502022-11-28 Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence Coeckelbergh, Mark AI Ethics Original Research Democratic theories assume that citizens have some form of political knowledge in order to vote for representatives or to directly engage in democratic deliberation and participation. However, apart from widespread attention to the phenomenon of fake news and misinformation, less attention has been paid to how they are supposed to acquire that knowledge in contexts shaped by artificial intelligence and related digital technologies. While this topic can also be approached from an empirical angle, this paper contributes to supporting concerns about AI and democracy by looking at the issue through the lens of political epistemology, in particular using the concept of epistemic agency. It argues that artificial intelligence (AI) endangers democracy since it risks to diminish the epistemic agency of citizens and thereby undermine the relevant kind of political agency in democracy. It shows that next to fake news and manipulation by means of AI analysis of big data, epistemic bubbles and the defaulting of statistical knowledge endanger the epistemic agency of citizens when they form and wish to revise their political beliefs. AI risks to undermine trust in one’s own epistemic capacities and hinder the exercise of those capacities. If we want to protect the knowledge basis of our democracies, we must address these problems in education and technology policy. Springer International Publishing 2022-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9685050/ /pubmed/36466152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00239-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Coeckelbergh, Mark
Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence
title Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence
title_full Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence
title_fullStr Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence
title_full_unstemmed Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence
title_short Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence
title_sort democracy, epistemic agency, and ai: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36466152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00239-4
work_keys_str_mv AT coeckelberghmark democracyepistemicagencyandaipoliticalepistemologyintimesofartificialintelligence