Cargando…
What editors, reviewers, researchers and librarians need to know about the PRESS, MECIR, PRISMA and AMSTAR instruments with regard to improving the methodological quality of searches for information for articles
Autor principal: | Puga, Maria Eduarda dos Santos |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33346317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2020.138625112020 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reporting and methodologic evaluation of meta-analyses published in the anesthesia literature according to AMSTAR and PRISMA checklists: a preliminary study
por: Oh, Jae Hoon, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines
por: Kelly, Shannon E, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Editorial Perspective: Time for Another Grading System—From PRISMA to AMSTAR 2
por: Chapman, Jens R.
Publicado: (2020) -
Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR
por: Dosenovic, Svjetlana, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
A Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analysis Studies in Dance Therapy Using AMSTAR and AMSTAR 2
por: Kim, Hye-Ryeon, et al.
Publicado: (2020)