Cargando…

Chemometric Strategies for Fully Automated Interpretive Method Development in Liquid Chromatography

[Image: see text] The majority of liquid chromatography (LC) methods are still developed in a conventional manner, that is, by analysts who rely on their knowledge and experience to make method development decisions. In this work, a novel, open-source algorithm was developed for automated and interp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bos, Tijmen S., Boelrijk, Jim, Molenaar, Stef R. A., van ’t Veer, Brian, Niezen, Leon E., van Herwerden, Denice, Samanipour, Saer, Stoll, Dwight R., Forré, Patrick, Ensing, Bernd, Somsen, Govert W., Pirok, Bob W. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36318471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c03160
_version_ 1784835540405714944
author Bos, Tijmen S.
Boelrijk, Jim
Molenaar, Stef R. A.
van ’t Veer, Brian
Niezen, Leon E.
van Herwerden, Denice
Samanipour, Saer
Stoll, Dwight R.
Forré, Patrick
Ensing, Bernd
Somsen, Govert W.
Pirok, Bob W. J.
author_facet Bos, Tijmen S.
Boelrijk, Jim
Molenaar, Stef R. A.
van ’t Veer, Brian
Niezen, Leon E.
van Herwerden, Denice
Samanipour, Saer
Stoll, Dwight R.
Forré, Patrick
Ensing, Bernd
Somsen, Govert W.
Pirok, Bob W. J.
author_sort Bos, Tijmen S.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The majority of liquid chromatography (LC) methods are still developed in a conventional manner, that is, by analysts who rely on their knowledge and experience to make method development decisions. In this work, a novel, open-source algorithm was developed for automated and interpretive method development of LC(−mass spectrometry) separations (“AutoLC”). A closed-loop workflow was constructed that interacted directly with the LC system and ran unsupervised in an automated fashion. To achieve this, several challenges related to peak tracking, retention modeling, the automated design of candidate gradient profiles, and the simulation of chromatograms were investigated. The algorithm was tested using two newly designed method development strategies. The first utilized retention modeling, whereas the second used a Bayesian-optimization machine learning approach. In both cases, the algorithm could arrive within 4–10 iterations (i.e., sets of method parameters) at an optimum of the objective function, which included resolution and analysis time as measures of performance. Retention modeling was found to be more efficient while depending on peak tracking, whereas Bayesian optimization was more flexible but limited in scalability. We have deliberately designed the algorithm to be modular to facilitate compatibility with previous and future work (e.g., previously published data handling algorithms).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9685588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96855882022-11-25 Chemometric Strategies for Fully Automated Interpretive Method Development in Liquid Chromatography Bos, Tijmen S. Boelrijk, Jim Molenaar, Stef R. A. van ’t Veer, Brian Niezen, Leon E. van Herwerden, Denice Samanipour, Saer Stoll, Dwight R. Forré, Patrick Ensing, Bernd Somsen, Govert W. Pirok, Bob W. J. Anal Chem [Image: see text] The majority of liquid chromatography (LC) methods are still developed in a conventional manner, that is, by analysts who rely on their knowledge and experience to make method development decisions. In this work, a novel, open-source algorithm was developed for automated and interpretive method development of LC(−mass spectrometry) separations (“AutoLC”). A closed-loop workflow was constructed that interacted directly with the LC system and ran unsupervised in an automated fashion. To achieve this, several challenges related to peak tracking, retention modeling, the automated design of candidate gradient profiles, and the simulation of chromatograms were investigated. The algorithm was tested using two newly designed method development strategies. The first utilized retention modeling, whereas the second used a Bayesian-optimization machine learning approach. In both cases, the algorithm could arrive within 4–10 iterations (i.e., sets of method parameters) at an optimum of the objective function, which included resolution and analysis time as measures of performance. Retention modeling was found to be more efficient while depending on peak tracking, whereas Bayesian optimization was more flexible but limited in scalability. We have deliberately designed the algorithm to be modular to facilitate compatibility with previous and future work (e.g., previously published data handling algorithms). American Chemical Society 2022-11-01 2022-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9685588/ /pubmed/36318471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c03160 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Bos, Tijmen S.
Boelrijk, Jim
Molenaar, Stef R. A.
van ’t Veer, Brian
Niezen, Leon E.
van Herwerden, Denice
Samanipour, Saer
Stoll, Dwight R.
Forré, Patrick
Ensing, Bernd
Somsen, Govert W.
Pirok, Bob W. J.
Chemometric Strategies for Fully Automated Interpretive Method Development in Liquid Chromatography
title Chemometric Strategies for Fully Automated Interpretive Method Development in Liquid Chromatography
title_full Chemometric Strategies for Fully Automated Interpretive Method Development in Liquid Chromatography
title_fullStr Chemometric Strategies for Fully Automated Interpretive Method Development in Liquid Chromatography
title_full_unstemmed Chemometric Strategies for Fully Automated Interpretive Method Development in Liquid Chromatography
title_short Chemometric Strategies for Fully Automated Interpretive Method Development in Liquid Chromatography
title_sort chemometric strategies for fully automated interpretive method development in liquid chromatography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36318471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c03160
work_keys_str_mv AT bostijmens chemometricstrategiesforfullyautomatedinterpretivemethoddevelopmentinliquidchromatography
AT boelrijkjim chemometricstrategiesforfullyautomatedinterpretivemethoddevelopmentinliquidchromatography
AT molenaarstefra chemometricstrategiesforfullyautomatedinterpretivemethoddevelopmentinliquidchromatography
AT vantveerbrian chemometricstrategiesforfullyautomatedinterpretivemethoddevelopmentinliquidchromatography
AT niezenleone chemometricstrategiesforfullyautomatedinterpretivemethoddevelopmentinliquidchromatography
AT vanherwerdendenice chemometricstrategiesforfullyautomatedinterpretivemethoddevelopmentinliquidchromatography
AT samanipoursaer chemometricstrategiesforfullyautomatedinterpretivemethoddevelopmentinliquidchromatography
AT stolldwightr chemometricstrategiesforfullyautomatedinterpretivemethoddevelopmentinliquidchromatography
AT forrepatrick chemometricstrategiesforfullyautomatedinterpretivemethoddevelopmentinliquidchromatography
AT ensingbernd chemometricstrategiesforfullyautomatedinterpretivemethoddevelopmentinliquidchromatography
AT somsengovertw chemometricstrategiesforfullyautomatedinterpretivemethoddevelopmentinliquidchromatography
AT pirokbobwj chemometricstrategiesforfullyautomatedinterpretivemethoddevelopmentinliquidchromatography