Cargando…
Economic evaluations of fall prevention exercise programs: a systematic review
OBJECTIVE: To investigate cost-effectiveness and costs of fall prevention exercise programmes for older adults. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation Database, Health Technology Assessment database...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36302631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-105747 |
_version_ | 1784835568010526720 |
---|---|
author | Pinheiro, Marina B Sherrington, Catherine Howard, Kirsten Caldwell, Patrick Tiedemann, Anne Wang, Belinda S Oliveira, Juliana Santos, Andreia Bull, Fiona C Willumsen, Juana F Michaleff, Zoe A Ferguson, Sarah Mayo, Eleesheva Fairhall, Nicola J Bauman, Adrian E Norris, Sarah |
author_facet | Pinheiro, Marina B Sherrington, Catherine Howard, Kirsten Caldwell, Patrick Tiedemann, Anne Wang, Belinda S Oliveira, Juliana Santos, Andreia Bull, Fiona C Willumsen, Juana F Michaleff, Zoe A Ferguson, Sarah Mayo, Eleesheva Fairhall, Nicola J Bauman, Adrian E Norris, Sarah |
author_sort | Pinheiro, Marina B |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate cost-effectiveness and costs of fall prevention exercise programmes for older adults. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation Database, Health Technology Assessment database, Tufts Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, Research Papers in Economics and EconLit (inception to May 2022). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Economic evaluations (trial-based or model-based) and costing studies investigating fall prevention exercise programmes versus no intervention or usual care for older adults living in the community or care facilities, and reporting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for fall-related outcomes or quality-adjusted life years (QALY, expressed as cost/QALY) and/or intervention costs. RESULTS: 31 studies were included. For community-dwelling older adults (21 economic evaluations, 6 costing studies), results ranged from more effective and less costly (dominant) interventions up to an ICER of US$279 802/QALY gained and US$11 986/fall prevented (US$ in 2020). Assuming an arbitrary willingness-to-pay threshold (US$100 000/QALY), most results (17/24) were considered cost-effective (moderate certainty). The greatest value for money (lower ICER/QALY gained and fall prevented) appeared to accrue for older adults and those with high fall risk, but unsupervised exercise appeared to offer poor value for money (higher ICER/QALY). For care facilities (two economic evaluations, two costing studies), ICERs ranged from dominant (low certainty) to US$35/fall prevented (moderate certainty). Overall, intervention costs varied and were poorly reported. CONCLUSIONS: Most economic evaluations investigated fall prevention exercise programmes for older adults living in the community. There is moderate certainty evidence that fall prevention exercise programmes are likely to be cost-effective. The evidence for older adults living in care facilities is more limited but promising. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020178023. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9685693 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96856932022-11-25 Economic evaluations of fall prevention exercise programs: a systematic review Pinheiro, Marina B Sherrington, Catherine Howard, Kirsten Caldwell, Patrick Tiedemann, Anne Wang, Belinda S Oliveira, Juliana Santos, Andreia Bull, Fiona C Willumsen, Juana F Michaleff, Zoe A Ferguson, Sarah Mayo, Eleesheva Fairhall, Nicola J Bauman, Adrian E Norris, Sarah Br J Sports Med Review OBJECTIVE: To investigate cost-effectiveness and costs of fall prevention exercise programmes for older adults. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation Database, Health Technology Assessment database, Tufts Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, Research Papers in Economics and EconLit (inception to May 2022). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Economic evaluations (trial-based or model-based) and costing studies investigating fall prevention exercise programmes versus no intervention or usual care for older adults living in the community or care facilities, and reporting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for fall-related outcomes or quality-adjusted life years (QALY, expressed as cost/QALY) and/or intervention costs. RESULTS: 31 studies were included. For community-dwelling older adults (21 economic evaluations, 6 costing studies), results ranged from more effective and less costly (dominant) interventions up to an ICER of US$279 802/QALY gained and US$11 986/fall prevented (US$ in 2020). Assuming an arbitrary willingness-to-pay threshold (US$100 000/QALY), most results (17/24) were considered cost-effective (moderate certainty). The greatest value for money (lower ICER/QALY gained and fall prevented) appeared to accrue for older adults and those with high fall risk, but unsupervised exercise appeared to offer poor value for money (higher ICER/QALY). For care facilities (two economic evaluations, two costing studies), ICERs ranged from dominant (low certainty) to US$35/fall prevented (moderate certainty). Overall, intervention costs varied and were poorly reported. CONCLUSIONS: Most economic evaluations investigated fall prevention exercise programmes for older adults living in the community. There is moderate certainty evidence that fall prevention exercise programmes are likely to be cost-effective. The evidence for older adults living in care facilities is more limited but promising. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020178023. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9685693/ /pubmed/36302631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-105747 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Pinheiro, Marina B Sherrington, Catherine Howard, Kirsten Caldwell, Patrick Tiedemann, Anne Wang, Belinda S Oliveira, Juliana Santos, Andreia Bull, Fiona C Willumsen, Juana F Michaleff, Zoe A Ferguson, Sarah Mayo, Eleesheva Fairhall, Nicola J Bauman, Adrian E Norris, Sarah Economic evaluations of fall prevention exercise programs: a systematic review |
title | Economic evaluations of fall prevention exercise programs: a systematic review |
title_full | Economic evaluations of fall prevention exercise programs: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Economic evaluations of fall prevention exercise programs: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Economic evaluations of fall prevention exercise programs: a systematic review |
title_short | Economic evaluations of fall prevention exercise programs: a systematic review |
title_sort | economic evaluations of fall prevention exercise programs: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36302631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-105747 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pinheiromarinab economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview AT sherringtoncatherine economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview AT howardkirsten economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview AT caldwellpatrick economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview AT tiedemannanne economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview AT wangbelinda economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview AT soliveirajuliana economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview AT santosandreia economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview AT bullfionac economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview AT willumsenjuanaf economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview AT michaleffzoea economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview AT fergusonsarah economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview AT mayoeleesheva economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview AT fairhallnicolaj economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview AT baumanadriane economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview AT norrissarah economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview |