Cargando…

Economic evaluations of fall prevention exercise programs: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To investigate cost-effectiveness and costs of fall prevention exercise programmes for older adults. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation Database, Health Technology Assessment database...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinheiro, Marina B, Sherrington, Catherine, Howard, Kirsten, Caldwell, Patrick, Tiedemann, Anne, Wang, Belinda, S Oliveira, Juliana, Santos, Andreia, Bull, Fiona C, Willumsen, Juana F, Michaleff, Zoe A, Ferguson, Sarah, Mayo, Eleesheva, Fairhall, Nicola J, Bauman, Adrian E, Norris, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36302631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-105747
_version_ 1784835568010526720
author Pinheiro, Marina B
Sherrington, Catherine
Howard, Kirsten
Caldwell, Patrick
Tiedemann, Anne
Wang, Belinda
S Oliveira, Juliana
Santos, Andreia
Bull, Fiona C
Willumsen, Juana F
Michaleff, Zoe A
Ferguson, Sarah
Mayo, Eleesheva
Fairhall, Nicola J
Bauman, Adrian E
Norris, Sarah
author_facet Pinheiro, Marina B
Sherrington, Catherine
Howard, Kirsten
Caldwell, Patrick
Tiedemann, Anne
Wang, Belinda
S Oliveira, Juliana
Santos, Andreia
Bull, Fiona C
Willumsen, Juana F
Michaleff, Zoe A
Ferguson, Sarah
Mayo, Eleesheva
Fairhall, Nicola J
Bauman, Adrian E
Norris, Sarah
author_sort Pinheiro, Marina B
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate cost-effectiveness and costs of fall prevention exercise programmes for older adults. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation Database, Health Technology Assessment database, Tufts Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, Research Papers in Economics and EconLit (inception to May 2022). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Economic evaluations (trial-based or model-based) and costing studies investigating fall prevention exercise programmes versus no intervention or usual care for older adults living in the community or care facilities, and reporting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for fall-related outcomes or quality-adjusted life years (QALY, expressed as cost/QALY) and/or intervention costs. RESULTS: 31 studies were included. For community-dwelling older adults (21 economic evaluations, 6 costing studies), results ranged from more effective and less costly (dominant) interventions up to an ICER of US$279 802/QALY gained and US$11 986/fall prevented (US$ in 2020). Assuming an arbitrary willingness-to-pay threshold (US$100 000/QALY), most results (17/24) were considered cost-effective (moderate certainty). The greatest value for money (lower ICER/QALY gained and fall prevented) appeared to accrue for older adults and those with high fall risk, but unsupervised exercise appeared to offer poor value for money (higher ICER/QALY). For care facilities (two economic evaluations, two costing studies), ICERs ranged from dominant (low certainty) to US$35/fall prevented (moderate certainty). Overall, intervention costs varied and were poorly reported. CONCLUSIONS: Most economic evaluations investigated fall prevention exercise programmes for older adults living in the community. There is moderate certainty evidence that fall prevention exercise programmes are likely to be cost-effective. The evidence for older adults living in care facilities is more limited but promising. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020178023.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9685693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96856932022-11-25 Economic evaluations of fall prevention exercise programs: a systematic review Pinheiro, Marina B Sherrington, Catherine Howard, Kirsten Caldwell, Patrick Tiedemann, Anne Wang, Belinda S Oliveira, Juliana Santos, Andreia Bull, Fiona C Willumsen, Juana F Michaleff, Zoe A Ferguson, Sarah Mayo, Eleesheva Fairhall, Nicola J Bauman, Adrian E Norris, Sarah Br J Sports Med Review OBJECTIVE: To investigate cost-effectiveness and costs of fall prevention exercise programmes for older adults. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation Database, Health Technology Assessment database, Tufts Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, Research Papers in Economics and EconLit (inception to May 2022). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Economic evaluations (trial-based or model-based) and costing studies investigating fall prevention exercise programmes versus no intervention or usual care for older adults living in the community or care facilities, and reporting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for fall-related outcomes or quality-adjusted life years (QALY, expressed as cost/QALY) and/or intervention costs. RESULTS: 31 studies were included. For community-dwelling older adults (21 economic evaluations, 6 costing studies), results ranged from more effective and less costly (dominant) interventions up to an ICER of US$279 802/QALY gained and US$11 986/fall prevented (US$ in 2020). Assuming an arbitrary willingness-to-pay threshold (US$100 000/QALY), most results (17/24) were considered cost-effective (moderate certainty). The greatest value for money (lower ICER/QALY gained and fall prevented) appeared to accrue for older adults and those with high fall risk, but unsupervised exercise appeared to offer poor value for money (higher ICER/QALY). For care facilities (two economic evaluations, two costing studies), ICERs ranged from dominant (low certainty) to US$35/fall prevented (moderate certainty). Overall, intervention costs varied and were poorly reported. CONCLUSIONS: Most economic evaluations investigated fall prevention exercise programmes for older adults living in the community. There is moderate certainty evidence that fall prevention exercise programmes are likely to be cost-effective. The evidence for older adults living in care facilities is more limited but promising. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020178023. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9685693/ /pubmed/36302631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-105747 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Pinheiro, Marina B
Sherrington, Catherine
Howard, Kirsten
Caldwell, Patrick
Tiedemann, Anne
Wang, Belinda
S Oliveira, Juliana
Santos, Andreia
Bull, Fiona C
Willumsen, Juana F
Michaleff, Zoe A
Ferguson, Sarah
Mayo, Eleesheva
Fairhall, Nicola J
Bauman, Adrian E
Norris, Sarah
Economic evaluations of fall prevention exercise programs: a systematic review
title Economic evaluations of fall prevention exercise programs: a systematic review
title_full Economic evaluations of fall prevention exercise programs: a systematic review
title_fullStr Economic evaluations of fall prevention exercise programs: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluations of fall prevention exercise programs: a systematic review
title_short Economic evaluations of fall prevention exercise programs: a systematic review
title_sort economic evaluations of fall prevention exercise programs: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36302631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-105747
work_keys_str_mv AT pinheiromarinab economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview
AT sherringtoncatherine economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview
AT howardkirsten economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview
AT caldwellpatrick economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview
AT tiedemannanne economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview
AT wangbelinda economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview
AT soliveirajuliana economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview
AT santosandreia economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview
AT bullfionac economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview
AT willumsenjuanaf economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview
AT michaleffzoea economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview
AT fergusonsarah economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview
AT mayoeleesheva economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview
AT fairhallnicolaj economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview
AT baumanadriane economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview
AT norrissarah economicevaluationsoffallpreventionexerciseprogramsasystematicreview