Cargando…

Improved rapid diagnostic tests to detect syphilis and yaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Current rapid tests for syphilis and yaws can detect treponemal and non-treponemal antibodies. We aimed to critically appraise the literature for rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) which can better distinguish an active infection of syphilis or yaws. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Ying, Goh, Su Mei, Mello, Maeve B, Baggaley, Rachel C, Wi, Teodora, Johnson, Cheryl C, Asiedu, Kingsley B, Marks, Michael, Pham, Minh D, Fairley, Christopher K, Chow, Eric P F, Mitjà, Oriol, Toskin, Igor, Ballard, Ronald C, Ong, Jason J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36180209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2022-055546
_version_ 1784835573166374912
author Zhang, Ying
Goh, Su Mei
Mello, Maeve B
Baggaley, Rachel C
Wi, Teodora
Johnson, Cheryl C
Asiedu, Kingsley B
Marks, Michael
Pham, Minh D
Fairley, Christopher K
Chow, Eric P F
Mitjà, Oriol
Toskin, Igor
Ballard, Ronald C
Ong, Jason J
author_facet Zhang, Ying
Goh, Su Mei
Mello, Maeve B
Baggaley, Rachel C
Wi, Teodora
Johnson, Cheryl C
Asiedu, Kingsley B
Marks, Michael
Pham, Minh D
Fairley, Christopher K
Chow, Eric P F
Mitjà, Oriol
Toskin, Igor
Ballard, Ronald C
Ong, Jason J
author_sort Zhang, Ying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current rapid tests for syphilis and yaws can detect treponemal and non-treponemal antibodies. We aimed to critically appraise the literature for rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) which can better distinguish an active infection of syphilis or yaws. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching five databases between January 2010 and October 2021 (with an update in July 2022). A generalised linear mixed model was used to conduct a bivariate meta-analysis for the pooled sensitivity and specificity. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) statistic. We used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) to assess the risk of bias and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) to evaluate the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: We included 17 studies for meta-analyses. For syphilis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the treponemal component were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86 to 0.97) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96 to 0.99), respectively. For the non-treponemal component, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82 to 0.95) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92 to 0.99), respectively. For yaws, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the treponemal component were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.66 to 0.95) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94 to 0.99), respectively. For the non-treponemal component, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.55 to 0.93) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.92 to 0.98), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: RDTs that can differentiate between active and previously treated infections could optimise management by providing same-day treatment and reducing unnecessary treatment. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021279587.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9685714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96857142022-11-25 Improved rapid diagnostic tests to detect syphilis and yaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Ying Goh, Su Mei Mello, Maeve B Baggaley, Rachel C Wi, Teodora Johnson, Cheryl C Asiedu, Kingsley B Marks, Michael Pham, Minh D Fairley, Christopher K Chow, Eric P F Mitjà, Oriol Toskin, Igor Ballard, Ronald C Ong, Jason J Sex Transm Infect Review BACKGROUND: Current rapid tests for syphilis and yaws can detect treponemal and non-treponemal antibodies. We aimed to critically appraise the literature for rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) which can better distinguish an active infection of syphilis or yaws. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching five databases between January 2010 and October 2021 (with an update in July 2022). A generalised linear mixed model was used to conduct a bivariate meta-analysis for the pooled sensitivity and specificity. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) statistic. We used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) to assess the risk of bias and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) to evaluate the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: We included 17 studies for meta-analyses. For syphilis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the treponemal component were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86 to 0.97) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96 to 0.99), respectively. For the non-treponemal component, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82 to 0.95) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92 to 0.99), respectively. For yaws, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the treponemal component were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.66 to 0.95) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94 to 0.99), respectively. For the non-treponemal component, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.55 to 0.93) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.92 to 0.98), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: RDTs that can differentiate between active and previously treated infections could optimise management by providing same-day treatment and reducing unnecessary treatment. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021279587. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9685714/ /pubmed/36180209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2022-055546 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Zhang, Ying
Goh, Su Mei
Mello, Maeve B
Baggaley, Rachel C
Wi, Teodora
Johnson, Cheryl C
Asiedu, Kingsley B
Marks, Michael
Pham, Minh D
Fairley, Christopher K
Chow, Eric P F
Mitjà, Oriol
Toskin, Igor
Ballard, Ronald C
Ong, Jason J
Improved rapid diagnostic tests to detect syphilis and yaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Improved rapid diagnostic tests to detect syphilis and yaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Improved rapid diagnostic tests to detect syphilis and yaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Improved rapid diagnostic tests to detect syphilis and yaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Improved rapid diagnostic tests to detect syphilis and yaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Improved rapid diagnostic tests to detect syphilis and yaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort improved rapid diagnostic tests to detect syphilis and yaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36180209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2022-055546
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangying improvedrapiddiagnosticteststodetectsyphilisandyawsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gohsumei improvedrapiddiagnosticteststodetectsyphilisandyawsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mellomaeveb improvedrapiddiagnosticteststodetectsyphilisandyawsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baggaleyrachelc improvedrapiddiagnosticteststodetectsyphilisandyawsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT witeodora improvedrapiddiagnosticteststodetectsyphilisandyawsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT johnsoncherylc improvedrapiddiagnosticteststodetectsyphilisandyawsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT asiedukingsleyb improvedrapiddiagnosticteststodetectsyphilisandyawsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT marksmichael improvedrapiddiagnosticteststodetectsyphilisandyawsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT phamminhd improvedrapiddiagnosticteststodetectsyphilisandyawsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fairleychristopherk improvedrapiddiagnosticteststodetectsyphilisandyawsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chowericpf improvedrapiddiagnosticteststodetectsyphilisandyawsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mitjaoriol improvedrapiddiagnosticteststodetectsyphilisandyawsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT toskinigor improvedrapiddiagnosticteststodetectsyphilisandyawsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ballardronaldc improvedrapiddiagnosticteststodetectsyphilisandyawsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ongjasonj improvedrapiddiagnosticteststodetectsyphilisandyawsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis