Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness of exercise, antidepressants and their combination in treating non-severe depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE: To assess the comparative effectiveness of exercise, antidepressants and their combination for alleviating depressive symptoms in adults with non-severe depression. DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Scien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Recchia, Francesco, Leung, Chit K, Chin, Edwin C, Fong, Daniel Y, Montero, David, Cheng, Calvin P, Yau, Suk Yu, Siu, Parco M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36113975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-105964
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To assess the comparative effectiveness of exercise, antidepressants and their combination for alleviating depressive symptoms in adults with non-severe depression. DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus and SportDiscus. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (1990–present) that examined the effectiveness of an exercise, antidepressant or combination intervention against either treatment alone or a control/placebo condition in adults with non-severe depression. STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS: Risk of bias, indirectness and the overall confidence in the network were assessed by two independent investigators. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed to examine postintervention differences in depressive symptom severity between groups. Intervention drop-out was assessed as a measure of treatment acceptability. RESULTS: Twenty-one randomised controlled trials (n=2551) with 25 comparisons were included in the network. There were no differences in treatment effectiveness among the three main interventions (exercise vs antidepressants: standardised mean differences, SMD, −0.12; 95% CI −0.33 to 0.10, combination versus exercise: SMD, 0.00; 95% CI −0.33 to 0.33, combination vs antidepressants: SMD, −0.12; 95% CI −0.40 to 0.16), although all treatments were more beneficial than controls. Exercise interventions had higher drop-out rates than antidepressant interventions (risk ratio 1.31; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.57). Heterogeneity in the network was moderate (τ(2)=0.03; I(2)=46%). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest no difference between exercise and pharmacological interventions in reducing depressive symptoms in adults with non-severe depression. These findings support the adoption of exercise as an alternative or adjuvant treatment for non-severe depression in adults. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD4202122656.