Cargando…

Complex PrEP: the factors requiring consultant-led review of PrEP users

INTRODUCTION: HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been available in England since March 2020 on the National Health Service using generic emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil. 56 Dean Street (56DS) provided PrEP through (1) additional private care from September 2015, estimated to be providi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tittle, Victoria, Dalton, Rebecca, Nugent, Diarmuid, Girometti, Nicolo, Whitlock, Gary, Mcowan, Alan, McCormack, Sheena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35169002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2021-055277
_version_ 1784835576651841536
author Tittle, Victoria
Dalton, Rebecca
Nugent, Diarmuid
Girometti, Nicolo
Whitlock, Gary
Mcowan, Alan
McCormack, Sheena
author_facet Tittle, Victoria
Dalton, Rebecca
Nugent, Diarmuid
Girometti, Nicolo
Whitlock, Gary
Mcowan, Alan
McCormack, Sheena
author_sort Tittle, Victoria
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been available in England since March 2020 on the National Health Service using generic emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil. 56 Dean Street (56DS) provided PrEP through (1) additional private care from September 2015, estimated to be providing 11% of England’s PrEP in 2019; and (2) the IMPACT trial, as well as monitoring those self-sourcing PrEP. Providing PrEP at scale through a nurse-led service required a safety net for complex individuals. 56DS introduced a consultant-led PrEP outpatient service, the PrEP review clinic, in January 2018 and we report the outcomes of this service. METHODS: We present a retrospective case note review of the PrEP review clinic with descriptive outcomes from 26 January 2018 to 20 December 2019. Reason for referral, demographics, PrEP management and PrEP discontinuations were recorded. RESULTS: 13 980 unique users accessed PrEP from 56DS during the two year evaluation period. 220 individuals were seen in the PrEP review clinic. Majority of patients were referred for renal issues (114 of 220, 51.8%), followed by side effects (59 of 220, 26.8%) and comorbidities (38 of 220, 17.2%). Of those with renal issues, 89 (out of 114, 78.1%) users were referred for an abnormal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). 35 (out of 114, 30.7%) PrEP users had an eGFR between 45 and 59 mL/min/1.73 m(2), of whom 2 (5.7%) discontinued PrEP. Majority of users were advised to stop supplements±switch to event-based dosing (24 of 35, 68.6%). Ten PrEP users were referred with an eGFR between 30 and 44 mL/min/1.73 m(2); 4 (40%) stopped or did not start PrEP and 6 (60%) were asked to stop supplements±switch to event-based dosing. DISCUSSION: A small proportion of PrEP users have complex PrEP issues. Methods to manage renal dysfunction with PrEP included stopping supplements and switching to event-based dosing. Those with side effects were managed with an array of options, with only modest effectiveness. Other PrEP options are needed to support those with toxicities or intolerances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9685731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96857312022-11-25 Complex PrEP: the factors requiring consultant-led review of PrEP users Tittle, Victoria Dalton, Rebecca Nugent, Diarmuid Girometti, Nicolo Whitlock, Gary Mcowan, Alan McCormack, Sheena Sex Transm Infect Short Report INTRODUCTION: HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been available in England since March 2020 on the National Health Service using generic emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil. 56 Dean Street (56DS) provided PrEP through (1) additional private care from September 2015, estimated to be providing 11% of England’s PrEP in 2019; and (2) the IMPACT trial, as well as monitoring those self-sourcing PrEP. Providing PrEP at scale through a nurse-led service required a safety net for complex individuals. 56DS introduced a consultant-led PrEP outpatient service, the PrEP review clinic, in January 2018 and we report the outcomes of this service. METHODS: We present a retrospective case note review of the PrEP review clinic with descriptive outcomes from 26 January 2018 to 20 December 2019. Reason for referral, demographics, PrEP management and PrEP discontinuations were recorded. RESULTS: 13 980 unique users accessed PrEP from 56DS during the two year evaluation period. 220 individuals were seen in the PrEP review clinic. Majority of patients were referred for renal issues (114 of 220, 51.8%), followed by side effects (59 of 220, 26.8%) and comorbidities (38 of 220, 17.2%). Of those with renal issues, 89 (out of 114, 78.1%) users were referred for an abnormal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). 35 (out of 114, 30.7%) PrEP users had an eGFR between 45 and 59 mL/min/1.73 m(2), of whom 2 (5.7%) discontinued PrEP. Majority of users were advised to stop supplements±switch to event-based dosing (24 of 35, 68.6%). Ten PrEP users were referred with an eGFR between 30 and 44 mL/min/1.73 m(2); 4 (40%) stopped or did not start PrEP and 6 (60%) were asked to stop supplements±switch to event-based dosing. DISCUSSION: A small proportion of PrEP users have complex PrEP issues. Methods to manage renal dysfunction with PrEP included stopping supplements and switching to event-based dosing. Those with side effects were managed with an array of options, with only modest effectiveness. Other PrEP options are needed to support those with toxicities or intolerances. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12 2022-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9685731/ /pubmed/35169002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2021-055277 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Short Report
Tittle, Victoria
Dalton, Rebecca
Nugent, Diarmuid
Girometti, Nicolo
Whitlock, Gary
Mcowan, Alan
McCormack, Sheena
Complex PrEP: the factors requiring consultant-led review of PrEP users
title Complex PrEP: the factors requiring consultant-led review of PrEP users
title_full Complex PrEP: the factors requiring consultant-led review of PrEP users
title_fullStr Complex PrEP: the factors requiring consultant-led review of PrEP users
title_full_unstemmed Complex PrEP: the factors requiring consultant-led review of PrEP users
title_short Complex PrEP: the factors requiring consultant-led review of PrEP users
title_sort complex prep: the factors requiring consultant-led review of prep users
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35169002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2021-055277
work_keys_str_mv AT tittlevictoria complexprepthefactorsrequiringconsultantledreviewofprepusers
AT daltonrebecca complexprepthefactorsrequiringconsultantledreviewofprepusers
AT nugentdiarmuid complexprepthefactorsrequiringconsultantledreviewofprepusers
AT giromettinicolo complexprepthefactorsrequiringconsultantledreviewofprepusers
AT whitlockgary complexprepthefactorsrequiringconsultantledreviewofprepusers
AT mcowanalan complexprepthefactorsrequiringconsultantledreviewofprepusers
AT mccormacksheena complexprepthefactorsrequiringconsultantledreviewofprepusers