Cargando…

Reformative Effects of Intumescent Coating on the Structural Characteristics of Cold-Formed Steel

[Image: see text] Intumescent fire-resistive coatings are a more recent type of passive fireproofing thin film that swells many times its initial applied thickness, generating an insulating char that functions as a thermal barrier between the fire and structural steel. It keeps the heat of steel mem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yazici, Casim, Mehmet Özkal, Fatih, Nazif Orhan, Suleyman, Kaan Cirpici, Burak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36440174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c06017
Descripción
Sumario:[Image: see text] Intumescent fire-resistive coatings are a more recent type of passive fireproofing thin film that swells many times its initial applied thickness, generating an insulating char that functions as a thermal barrier between the fire and structural steel. It keeps the heat of steel members from reaching critical levels and aids in the structural integrity during a fire. They are architects and designers’ favorite choice for passive fire protection of load-bearing steel frame structures because of their aesthetic look, versatility, rapidity of application, and ease of inspection and maintenance. In this study, axial tensile, thermal conductivity, and hardness tests have been performed on S235 cold-formed steel specimens that were exposed to increasing temperature periods. The mechanical behavior of coated and uncoated specimens was investigated over the modulus of elasticity, yield strength/strain, and ultimate strength/strain values for all temperatures. As a result of the research, gradually increasing changes were observed in the mechanical properties of coated and uncoated specimens at increasing temperature levels, compared to each other. However, performance increment on the coated specimens was limited in terms of strength and strain characteristics than expected. Two essential reasons for this conclusion are that the specimens were exposed to heat for a long time after reaching the target temperature and also that the wall thickness of the specimens was thinner with respect to the usual application method of the protective coating. In order to examine the structural properties of the test specimens after elevated temperature effects, thermal conductivity measurement was also performed. Temperature difference between coated and uncoated surfaces provided a benefit in the range of 29–56% due to the coating. Lastly, microstructure imaging techniques demonstrated grain coarsening and no crack development with the increase in temperature.