Cargando…
Surface roughness and characteristics of CAD/CAM zirconia and glass ceramics after combined treatment procedures
BACKGROUND: The roughening of the inner surface of a fixed ceramic restoration is an important factor for the bonding process. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of combined surface treatments (acid etching, air-abrasion and Er: YAG Laser) on surface roughness of CAD/CAM fabricated z...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02389-7 |
_version_ | 1784835627413405696 |
---|---|
author | Dikicier, Sibel Korkmaz, Cumhur Atay, Arzu |
author_facet | Dikicier, Sibel Korkmaz, Cumhur Atay, Arzu |
author_sort | Dikicier, Sibel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The roughening of the inner surface of a fixed ceramic restoration is an important factor for the bonding process. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of combined surface treatments (acid etching, air-abrasion and Er: YAG Laser) on surface roughness of CAD/CAM fabricated zirconia (ZrO(2)) and lithium-disilicate glass ceramics (LDS). METHODS: Sixty ZrO(2) (Ceramill Zi) and LDS (IPS e.max CAD) specimens, (5 mm in width, 5 mm in length and 1.5 mm in height) were fabricated using CAD/CAM and sintered according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All specimens subjected to three surface treatment combinations; etching with 4% hydrofluoric acide (HF), airborne-particle abrasion with 110-μm alumina (Al(2)O(3)) (AP) and Er:YAG laser (Er:YAG) (Group A—HF + AP; Group B—Er:YAG + AP, and Group C—Er:YAG + HF). Perthometer was used to measure the surface roughness of the specimens before and after the tretments. RESULTS: Group A presented the highest Ra (LDS 0.81 ± 0.27 and ZrO(2) 0.67 ± 0.21 after treatment) and Group C the lowest (LDS 0.45 ± 0.13 and ZrO(2) 0.26 ± 0.07, after treatment). Compared with before treatment, the Ra were significantly different only in Group A both ZrO(2) and LDS after treatment (p < 0.05). Qualitative SEM images suggested the surface topography of the ZrO(2) was smoother than the LDS. Less surface changes were observed in the Er:YAG combined procedures than HF + AP. CONCLUSIONS: HF + AP was significantly succesful in modifying the ceramic surface. Er:YAG did not sufficiently promote the surface topography, even if combined with any other treatments. Overall, surface tretments on ZrO(2) not easier than LDS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9685924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96859242022-11-25 Surface roughness and characteristics of CAD/CAM zirconia and glass ceramics after combined treatment procedures Dikicier, Sibel Korkmaz, Cumhur Atay, Arzu BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: The roughening of the inner surface of a fixed ceramic restoration is an important factor for the bonding process. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of combined surface treatments (acid etching, air-abrasion and Er: YAG Laser) on surface roughness of CAD/CAM fabricated zirconia (ZrO(2)) and lithium-disilicate glass ceramics (LDS). METHODS: Sixty ZrO(2) (Ceramill Zi) and LDS (IPS e.max CAD) specimens, (5 mm in width, 5 mm in length and 1.5 mm in height) were fabricated using CAD/CAM and sintered according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All specimens subjected to three surface treatment combinations; etching with 4% hydrofluoric acide (HF), airborne-particle abrasion with 110-μm alumina (Al(2)O(3)) (AP) and Er:YAG laser (Er:YAG) (Group A—HF + AP; Group B—Er:YAG + AP, and Group C—Er:YAG + HF). Perthometer was used to measure the surface roughness of the specimens before and after the tretments. RESULTS: Group A presented the highest Ra (LDS 0.81 ± 0.27 and ZrO(2) 0.67 ± 0.21 after treatment) and Group C the lowest (LDS 0.45 ± 0.13 and ZrO(2) 0.26 ± 0.07, after treatment). Compared with before treatment, the Ra were significantly different only in Group A both ZrO(2) and LDS after treatment (p < 0.05). Qualitative SEM images suggested the surface topography of the ZrO(2) was smoother than the LDS. Less surface changes were observed in the Er:YAG combined procedures than HF + AP. CONCLUSIONS: HF + AP was significantly succesful in modifying the ceramic surface. Er:YAG did not sufficiently promote the surface topography, even if combined with any other treatments. Overall, surface tretments on ZrO(2) not easier than LDS. BioMed Central 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9685924/ /pubmed/36419112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02389-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Dikicier, Sibel Korkmaz, Cumhur Atay, Arzu Surface roughness and characteristics of CAD/CAM zirconia and glass ceramics after combined treatment procedures |
title | Surface roughness and characteristics of CAD/CAM zirconia and glass ceramics after combined treatment procedures |
title_full | Surface roughness and characteristics of CAD/CAM zirconia and glass ceramics after combined treatment procedures |
title_fullStr | Surface roughness and characteristics of CAD/CAM zirconia and glass ceramics after combined treatment procedures |
title_full_unstemmed | Surface roughness and characteristics of CAD/CAM zirconia and glass ceramics after combined treatment procedures |
title_short | Surface roughness and characteristics of CAD/CAM zirconia and glass ceramics after combined treatment procedures |
title_sort | surface roughness and characteristics of cad/cam zirconia and glass ceramics after combined treatment procedures |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02389-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dikiciersibel surfaceroughnessandcharacteristicsofcadcamzirconiaandglassceramicsaftercombinedtreatmentprocedures AT korkmazcumhur surfaceroughnessandcharacteristicsofcadcamzirconiaandglassceramicsaftercombinedtreatmentprocedures AT atayarzu surfaceroughnessandcharacteristicsofcadcamzirconiaandglassceramicsaftercombinedtreatmentprocedures |