Cargando…

Comprehensive analysis of the differences between left- and right-side colorectal cancer and respective prognostic prediction

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that the tumor heterogeneity and complex oncogenic mechanisms of proximal and distal colon cancer (CRC) are divergent. Therefore, we aim to analyze the differences between left-sided CRC (L_cancer) and right-sided CRC (R_cancer), as well as constructing res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niu, Mengye, Chen, Chengyang, Gao, Xian, Guo, Yi, Zhang, Bingzhou, Wang, Xin, Chen, Shihao, Niu, Xupeng, Zhang, Chao, Li, Like, Li, Zhongxin, Zhao, Zengren, Jiang, Xia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02585-3
_version_ 1784835636934475776
author Niu, Mengye
Chen, Chengyang
Gao, Xian
Guo, Yi
Zhang, Bingzhou
Wang, Xin
Chen, Shihao
Niu, Xupeng
Zhang, Chao
Li, Like
Li, Zhongxin
Zhao, Zengren
Jiang, Xia
author_facet Niu, Mengye
Chen, Chengyang
Gao, Xian
Guo, Yi
Zhang, Bingzhou
Wang, Xin
Chen, Shihao
Niu, Xupeng
Zhang, Chao
Li, Like
Li, Zhongxin
Zhao, Zengren
Jiang, Xia
author_sort Niu, Mengye
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that the tumor heterogeneity and complex oncogenic mechanisms of proximal and distal colon cancer (CRC) are divergent. Therefore, we aim to analyze the differences between left-sided CRC (L_cancer) and right-sided CRC (R_cancer), as well as constructing respective nomograms. METHODS: We enrolled 335 colon cancer patients (146 L_cancer patients and 189 R_cancer patients) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data sets, and 102 pairs of color cancer tissue and adjacent normal tissue (51 L_cancer patients and 51 R_cancer patients) from our hospital. Firstly, we analyzed the differences between the L_cancer patients and R_cancer patients, and then established the L_cancer and R_cancer prognostic models using LASSO Cox. RESULTS: R_cancer patients had lower survival than L_cancer patients. R_cancer patients had higher ESTIMATE and immune scores and lower tumor purity. These patterns of expression of immune checkpoint-related genes and TMB level were higher in R_cancer than in L_cancer patients. Finally, we using Lasso Cox regression analyses established a prognostic model for L_cancer patients and a prognostic model for R_cancer patients. The AUC values of the risk score for OS in L_cancer were 0.862 in the training set and 0.914 in the testing set, while those in R_cancer were 0.835 in the training set and 0.857 in the testing set. The AUC values in fivefold cross-validation were between 0.727 and 0.978, proving that the two prognostic models have great stability. The nomogram of L_cancer included prognostic genes, age, pathological M, pathological stage, and gender, the AUC values of which were 0.800 in the training set and 0.905 in the testing set. Meanwhile, the nomogram of R_cancer comprised prognostic genes, pathological N, pathological T, and age, the AUC values of which were 0.836 in the training set and 0.850 in the testing set. In the R_cancer patients, high-risk patients had a lower proportion of ‘B cells memory’, ‘Dendritic cells resting’, immune score, ESTIMATE score, immune checkpoint-related genes, and HLA-family genes, and a higher proportion of ‘T cells follicular helper’, ‘Dendritic cells activated’, and ‘Mast cells activated’. CONCLUSIONS: We found significant differences between L_cancer and R_cancer patients and established a clinical predictive nomogram for L_cancer patients and a nomogram for R_cancer patients. Additionally, R_cancer patients in low-risk groups may be more beneficial from immunotherapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02585-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9685975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96859752022-11-25 Comprehensive analysis of the differences between left- and right-side colorectal cancer and respective prognostic prediction Niu, Mengye Chen, Chengyang Gao, Xian Guo, Yi Zhang, Bingzhou Wang, Xin Chen, Shihao Niu, Xupeng Zhang, Chao Li, Like Li, Zhongxin Zhao, Zengren Jiang, Xia BMC Gastroenterol Research BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that the tumor heterogeneity and complex oncogenic mechanisms of proximal and distal colon cancer (CRC) are divergent. Therefore, we aim to analyze the differences between left-sided CRC (L_cancer) and right-sided CRC (R_cancer), as well as constructing respective nomograms. METHODS: We enrolled 335 colon cancer patients (146 L_cancer patients and 189 R_cancer patients) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data sets, and 102 pairs of color cancer tissue and adjacent normal tissue (51 L_cancer patients and 51 R_cancer patients) from our hospital. Firstly, we analyzed the differences between the L_cancer patients and R_cancer patients, and then established the L_cancer and R_cancer prognostic models using LASSO Cox. RESULTS: R_cancer patients had lower survival than L_cancer patients. R_cancer patients had higher ESTIMATE and immune scores and lower tumor purity. These patterns of expression of immune checkpoint-related genes and TMB level were higher in R_cancer than in L_cancer patients. Finally, we using Lasso Cox regression analyses established a prognostic model for L_cancer patients and a prognostic model for R_cancer patients. The AUC values of the risk score for OS in L_cancer were 0.862 in the training set and 0.914 in the testing set, while those in R_cancer were 0.835 in the training set and 0.857 in the testing set. The AUC values in fivefold cross-validation were between 0.727 and 0.978, proving that the two prognostic models have great stability. The nomogram of L_cancer included prognostic genes, age, pathological M, pathological stage, and gender, the AUC values of which were 0.800 in the training set and 0.905 in the testing set. Meanwhile, the nomogram of R_cancer comprised prognostic genes, pathological N, pathological T, and age, the AUC values of which were 0.836 in the training set and 0.850 in the testing set. In the R_cancer patients, high-risk patients had a lower proportion of ‘B cells memory’, ‘Dendritic cells resting’, immune score, ESTIMATE score, immune checkpoint-related genes, and HLA-family genes, and a higher proportion of ‘T cells follicular helper’, ‘Dendritic cells activated’, and ‘Mast cells activated’. CONCLUSIONS: We found significant differences between L_cancer and R_cancer patients and established a clinical predictive nomogram for L_cancer patients and a nomogram for R_cancer patients. Additionally, R_cancer patients in low-risk groups may be more beneficial from immunotherapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02585-3. BioMed Central 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9685975/ /pubmed/36419007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02585-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Niu, Mengye
Chen, Chengyang
Gao, Xian
Guo, Yi
Zhang, Bingzhou
Wang, Xin
Chen, Shihao
Niu, Xupeng
Zhang, Chao
Li, Like
Li, Zhongxin
Zhao, Zengren
Jiang, Xia
Comprehensive analysis of the differences between left- and right-side colorectal cancer and respective prognostic prediction
title Comprehensive analysis of the differences between left- and right-side colorectal cancer and respective prognostic prediction
title_full Comprehensive analysis of the differences between left- and right-side colorectal cancer and respective prognostic prediction
title_fullStr Comprehensive analysis of the differences between left- and right-side colorectal cancer and respective prognostic prediction
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive analysis of the differences between left- and right-side colorectal cancer and respective prognostic prediction
title_short Comprehensive analysis of the differences between left- and right-side colorectal cancer and respective prognostic prediction
title_sort comprehensive analysis of the differences between left- and right-side colorectal cancer and respective prognostic prediction
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02585-3
work_keys_str_mv AT niumengye comprehensiveanalysisofthedifferencesbetweenleftandrightsidecolorectalcancerandrespectiveprognosticprediction
AT chenchengyang comprehensiveanalysisofthedifferencesbetweenleftandrightsidecolorectalcancerandrespectiveprognosticprediction
AT gaoxian comprehensiveanalysisofthedifferencesbetweenleftandrightsidecolorectalcancerandrespectiveprognosticprediction
AT guoyi comprehensiveanalysisofthedifferencesbetweenleftandrightsidecolorectalcancerandrespectiveprognosticprediction
AT zhangbingzhou comprehensiveanalysisofthedifferencesbetweenleftandrightsidecolorectalcancerandrespectiveprognosticprediction
AT wangxin comprehensiveanalysisofthedifferencesbetweenleftandrightsidecolorectalcancerandrespectiveprognosticprediction
AT chenshihao comprehensiveanalysisofthedifferencesbetweenleftandrightsidecolorectalcancerandrespectiveprognosticprediction
AT niuxupeng comprehensiveanalysisofthedifferencesbetweenleftandrightsidecolorectalcancerandrespectiveprognosticprediction
AT zhangchao comprehensiveanalysisofthedifferencesbetweenleftandrightsidecolorectalcancerandrespectiveprognosticprediction
AT lilike comprehensiveanalysisofthedifferencesbetweenleftandrightsidecolorectalcancerandrespectiveprognosticprediction
AT lizhongxin comprehensiveanalysisofthedifferencesbetweenleftandrightsidecolorectalcancerandrespectiveprognosticprediction
AT zhaozengren comprehensiveanalysisofthedifferencesbetweenleftandrightsidecolorectalcancerandrespectiveprognosticprediction
AT jiangxia comprehensiveanalysisofthedifferencesbetweenleftandrightsidecolorectalcancerandrespectiveprognosticprediction