Cargando…

The impact of assistive devices on community-dwelling older adults and their informal caregivers: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the impact of assistive devices on the life satisfaction of (Research Question 1), and informal caregiving hours received by (Research Question 2), community-dwelling older adults (≥ 65 years). METHODS: We searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marasinghe, Keshini Madara, Chaurasia, Ashok, Adil, Maisha, Liu, Qian Yue, Nur, Teeyaa Ibrahim, Oremus, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9686024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36424533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03557-8
_version_ 1784835648972128256
author Marasinghe, Keshini Madara
Chaurasia, Ashok
Adil, Maisha
Liu, Qian Yue
Nur, Teeyaa Ibrahim
Oremus, Mark
author_facet Marasinghe, Keshini Madara
Chaurasia, Ashok
Adil, Maisha
Liu, Qian Yue
Nur, Teeyaa Ibrahim
Oremus, Mark
author_sort Marasinghe, Keshini Madara
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the impact of assistive devices on the life satisfaction of (Research Question 1), and informal caregiving hours received by (Research Question 2), community-dwelling older adults (≥ 65 years). METHODS: We searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Scopus from database inception to March 2022. For each question, two reviewers independently screened citations, extracted and narratively synthesized the data, and assessed article quality and strength of evidence. RESULTS: Of the 1391 citations screened, we found two articles pertaining to each question, for a total of four articles. In general, assistive device use was not associated with life satisfaction, while it was positively associated with informal caregiving hours. However, the risk of bias was serious across the two studies for Research Question 1, and the overall quality of evidence was “very low”. The risk of bias was not serious across the two studies included in Research Question 2 and the overall quality of evidence was “low”. CONCLUSION: Due to the scarcity of studies, the limitations of existing studies (i.e., risk of bias), and the evidence being low or very low quality, we could not draw firm conclusions about the associations of interest. Additional research will produce a better understanding of the two relationships and provide further evidence to inform policy decisions regarding the provision and funding of assistive devices for community-dwelling older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database of systematic reviews (identification number: CRD42021248929). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03557-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9686024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96860242022-11-25 The impact of assistive devices on community-dwelling older adults and their informal caregivers: a systematic review Marasinghe, Keshini Madara Chaurasia, Ashok Adil, Maisha Liu, Qian Yue Nur, Teeyaa Ibrahim Oremus, Mark BMC Geriatr Research OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the impact of assistive devices on the life satisfaction of (Research Question 1), and informal caregiving hours received by (Research Question 2), community-dwelling older adults (≥ 65 years). METHODS: We searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Scopus from database inception to March 2022. For each question, two reviewers independently screened citations, extracted and narratively synthesized the data, and assessed article quality and strength of evidence. RESULTS: Of the 1391 citations screened, we found two articles pertaining to each question, for a total of four articles. In general, assistive device use was not associated with life satisfaction, while it was positively associated with informal caregiving hours. However, the risk of bias was serious across the two studies for Research Question 1, and the overall quality of evidence was “very low”. The risk of bias was not serious across the two studies included in Research Question 2 and the overall quality of evidence was “low”. CONCLUSION: Due to the scarcity of studies, the limitations of existing studies (i.e., risk of bias), and the evidence being low or very low quality, we could not draw firm conclusions about the associations of interest. Additional research will produce a better understanding of the two relationships and provide further evidence to inform policy decisions regarding the provision and funding of assistive devices for community-dwelling older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database of systematic reviews (identification number: CRD42021248929). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03557-8. BioMed Central 2022-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9686024/ /pubmed/36424533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03557-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Marasinghe, Keshini Madara
Chaurasia, Ashok
Adil, Maisha
Liu, Qian Yue
Nur, Teeyaa Ibrahim
Oremus, Mark
The impact of assistive devices on community-dwelling older adults and their informal caregivers: a systematic review
title The impact of assistive devices on community-dwelling older adults and their informal caregivers: a systematic review
title_full The impact of assistive devices on community-dwelling older adults and their informal caregivers: a systematic review
title_fullStr The impact of assistive devices on community-dwelling older adults and their informal caregivers: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The impact of assistive devices on community-dwelling older adults and their informal caregivers: a systematic review
title_short The impact of assistive devices on community-dwelling older adults and their informal caregivers: a systematic review
title_sort impact of assistive devices on community-dwelling older adults and their informal caregivers: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9686024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36424533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03557-8
work_keys_str_mv AT marasinghekeshinimadara theimpactofassistivedevicesoncommunitydwellingolderadultsandtheirinformalcaregiversasystematicreview
AT chaurasiaashok theimpactofassistivedevicesoncommunitydwellingolderadultsandtheirinformalcaregiversasystematicreview
AT adilmaisha theimpactofassistivedevicesoncommunitydwellingolderadultsandtheirinformalcaregiversasystematicreview
AT liuqianyue theimpactofassistivedevicesoncommunitydwellingolderadultsandtheirinformalcaregiversasystematicreview
AT nurteeyaaibrahim theimpactofassistivedevicesoncommunitydwellingolderadultsandtheirinformalcaregiversasystematicreview
AT oremusmark theimpactofassistivedevicesoncommunitydwellingolderadultsandtheirinformalcaregiversasystematicreview
AT marasinghekeshinimadara impactofassistivedevicesoncommunitydwellingolderadultsandtheirinformalcaregiversasystematicreview
AT chaurasiaashok impactofassistivedevicesoncommunitydwellingolderadultsandtheirinformalcaregiversasystematicreview
AT adilmaisha impactofassistivedevicesoncommunitydwellingolderadultsandtheirinformalcaregiversasystematicreview
AT liuqianyue impactofassistivedevicesoncommunitydwellingolderadultsandtheirinformalcaregiversasystematicreview
AT nurteeyaaibrahim impactofassistivedevicesoncommunitydwellingolderadultsandtheirinformalcaregiversasystematicreview
AT oremusmark impactofassistivedevicesoncommunitydwellingolderadultsandtheirinformalcaregiversasystematicreview