Cargando…

Economic evaluation of COVID-19 rapid antigen screening programs in the workplace

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic testing has been pivotal in detecting SARS-CoV-2 infections and reducing transmission through the isolation of positive cases. We quantified the value of implementing frequent, rapid antigen (RA) testing in the workplace to identify screening programs that are cost-effective....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vilches, Thomas N., Rafferty, Ellen, Wells, Chad R., Galvani, Alison P., Moghadas, Seyed M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9686464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36424587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02641-5
_version_ 1784835755333386240
author Vilches, Thomas N.
Rafferty, Ellen
Wells, Chad R.
Galvani, Alison P.
Moghadas, Seyed M.
author_facet Vilches, Thomas N.
Rafferty, Ellen
Wells, Chad R.
Galvani, Alison P.
Moghadas, Seyed M.
author_sort Vilches, Thomas N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnostic testing has been pivotal in detecting SARS-CoV-2 infections and reducing transmission through the isolation of positive cases. We quantified the value of implementing frequent, rapid antigen (RA) testing in the workplace to identify screening programs that are cost-effective. METHODS: To project the number of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths under alternative screening programs, we adapted an agent-based model of COVID-19 transmission and parameterized it with the demographics of Ontario, Canada, incorporating vaccination and waning of immunity. Taking into account healthcare costs and productivity losses associated with each program, we calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with quality-adjusted life year (QALY) as the measure of effect. Considering RT-PCR testing of only severe cases as the baseline scenario, we estimated the incremental net monetary benefits (iNMB) of the screening programs with varying durations and initiation times, as well as different booster coverages of working adults. RESULTS: Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of CDN$30,000 per QALY loss averted, twice weekly workplace screening was cost-effective only if the program started early during a surge. In most scenarios, the iNMB of RA screening without a confirmatory RT-PCR or RA test was comparable or higher than the iNMB for programs with a confirmatory test for RA-positive cases. When the program started early with a duration of at least 16 weeks and no confirmatory testing, the iNMB exceeded CDN$1.1 million per 100,000 population. Increasing booster coverage of working adults improved the iNMB of RA screening. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that frequent RA testing starting very early in a surge, without a confirmatory test, is a preferred screening program for the detection of asymptomatic infections in workplaces. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-022-02641-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9686464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96864642022-11-26 Economic evaluation of COVID-19 rapid antigen screening programs in the workplace Vilches, Thomas N. Rafferty, Ellen Wells, Chad R. Galvani, Alison P. Moghadas, Seyed M. BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Diagnostic testing has been pivotal in detecting SARS-CoV-2 infections and reducing transmission through the isolation of positive cases. We quantified the value of implementing frequent, rapid antigen (RA) testing in the workplace to identify screening programs that are cost-effective. METHODS: To project the number of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths under alternative screening programs, we adapted an agent-based model of COVID-19 transmission and parameterized it with the demographics of Ontario, Canada, incorporating vaccination and waning of immunity. Taking into account healthcare costs and productivity losses associated with each program, we calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with quality-adjusted life year (QALY) as the measure of effect. Considering RT-PCR testing of only severe cases as the baseline scenario, we estimated the incremental net monetary benefits (iNMB) of the screening programs with varying durations and initiation times, as well as different booster coverages of working adults. RESULTS: Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of CDN$30,000 per QALY loss averted, twice weekly workplace screening was cost-effective only if the program started early during a surge. In most scenarios, the iNMB of RA screening without a confirmatory RT-PCR or RA test was comparable or higher than the iNMB for programs with a confirmatory test for RA-positive cases. When the program started early with a duration of at least 16 weeks and no confirmatory testing, the iNMB exceeded CDN$1.1 million per 100,000 population. Increasing booster coverage of working adults improved the iNMB of RA screening. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that frequent RA testing starting very early in a surge, without a confirmatory test, is a preferred screening program for the detection of asymptomatic infections in workplaces. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-022-02641-5. BioMed Central 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9686464/ /pubmed/36424587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02641-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vilches, Thomas N.
Rafferty, Ellen
Wells, Chad R.
Galvani, Alison P.
Moghadas, Seyed M.
Economic evaluation of COVID-19 rapid antigen screening programs in the workplace
title Economic evaluation of COVID-19 rapid antigen screening programs in the workplace
title_full Economic evaluation of COVID-19 rapid antigen screening programs in the workplace
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of COVID-19 rapid antigen screening programs in the workplace
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of COVID-19 rapid antigen screening programs in the workplace
title_short Economic evaluation of COVID-19 rapid antigen screening programs in the workplace
title_sort economic evaluation of covid-19 rapid antigen screening programs in the workplace
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9686464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36424587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02641-5
work_keys_str_mv AT vilchesthomasn economicevaluationofcovid19rapidantigenscreeningprogramsintheworkplace
AT raffertyellen economicevaluationofcovid19rapidantigenscreeningprogramsintheworkplace
AT wellschadr economicevaluationofcovid19rapidantigenscreeningprogramsintheworkplace
AT galvanialisonp economicevaluationofcovid19rapidantigenscreeningprogramsintheworkplace
AT moghadasseyedm economicevaluationofcovid19rapidantigenscreeningprogramsintheworkplace