Cargando…

Octenidine’s Efficacy: A Matter of Interpretation or the Influence of Experimental Setups?

With its broad antimicrobial spectrum and non-specific mode of action via membrane disruption, any resistance to octenidine (OCT) seems unlikely and has not been observed in clinical settings so far. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of OCT against Escherichia coli and mutants lack...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vejzovic, Djenana, Iftic, Azra, Ön, Ayse, Semeraro, Enrico F., Malanovic, Nermina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9686575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36421309
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111665
_version_ 1784835784796274688
author Vejzovic, Djenana
Iftic, Azra
Ön, Ayse
Semeraro, Enrico F.
Malanovic, Nermina
author_facet Vejzovic, Djenana
Iftic, Azra
Ön, Ayse
Semeraro, Enrico F.
Malanovic, Nermina
author_sort Vejzovic, Djenana
collection PubMed
description With its broad antimicrobial spectrum and non-specific mode of action via membrane disruption, any resistance to octenidine (OCT) seems unlikely and has not been observed in clinical settings so far. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of OCT against Escherichia coli and mutants lacking specific lipid head groups which, due to altered membrane properties, might be the root cause for resistance development of membrane-active compounds. Furthermore, we aimed to test its efficacy under different experimental conditions including different solvents for OCT, bacterial concentration and methods for analysis. Our primary goal was to estimate how many OCT molecules are needed to kill one bacterium. We performed susceptibility assays by observing bacterial growth behavior, using a Bioscreen in an analogous manner for every condition. The growth curves were recorded for 20 h at 420–580 nm in presence of different OCT concentrations and were used to assess the inhibitory concentrations (IC(100%)) for OCT. Bacterial concentrations given in cell numbers were determined, followed by Bioscreen measurement by manual colony counting on agar plates and QUANTOM(TM) cell staining. This indicated a significant variance between both methods, which influenced IC(100%) of OCT, especially when used at low doses. The binding capacity of OCT to E. coli was investigated by measuring UV-absorbance of OCT exposed to bacteria and a common thermodynamic framework based on Bioscreen measurements. Results showed that OCT’s antimicrobial activity in E. coli is not affected by changes at the membrane level but strongly dependent on experimental settings in respect to solvents and applied bacterial counts. More OCT was required when the active was dissolved in phosphate or Hepes buffers instead of water and when higher bacterial concentration was used. Furthermore, binding studies revealed that 10(7)–10(8) OCT molecules bind to bacteria, which is necessary for the saturation of the bacterial surface to initiate the killing cascade. Our results clearly demonstrate that in vitro data, depending on the applied materials and the methods for determination of IC(100%), can easily be misinterpreted as reduced bacterial susceptibility towards OCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9686575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96865752022-11-25 Octenidine’s Efficacy: A Matter of Interpretation or the Influence of Experimental Setups? Vejzovic, Djenana Iftic, Azra Ön, Ayse Semeraro, Enrico F. Malanovic, Nermina Antibiotics (Basel) Article With its broad antimicrobial spectrum and non-specific mode of action via membrane disruption, any resistance to octenidine (OCT) seems unlikely and has not been observed in clinical settings so far. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of OCT against Escherichia coli and mutants lacking specific lipid head groups which, due to altered membrane properties, might be the root cause for resistance development of membrane-active compounds. Furthermore, we aimed to test its efficacy under different experimental conditions including different solvents for OCT, bacterial concentration and methods for analysis. Our primary goal was to estimate how many OCT molecules are needed to kill one bacterium. We performed susceptibility assays by observing bacterial growth behavior, using a Bioscreen in an analogous manner for every condition. The growth curves were recorded for 20 h at 420–580 nm in presence of different OCT concentrations and were used to assess the inhibitory concentrations (IC(100%)) for OCT. Bacterial concentrations given in cell numbers were determined, followed by Bioscreen measurement by manual colony counting on agar plates and QUANTOM(TM) cell staining. This indicated a significant variance between both methods, which influenced IC(100%) of OCT, especially when used at low doses. The binding capacity of OCT to E. coli was investigated by measuring UV-absorbance of OCT exposed to bacteria and a common thermodynamic framework based on Bioscreen measurements. Results showed that OCT’s antimicrobial activity in E. coli is not affected by changes at the membrane level but strongly dependent on experimental settings in respect to solvents and applied bacterial counts. More OCT was required when the active was dissolved in phosphate or Hepes buffers instead of water and when higher bacterial concentration was used. Furthermore, binding studies revealed that 10(7)–10(8) OCT molecules bind to bacteria, which is necessary for the saturation of the bacterial surface to initiate the killing cascade. Our results clearly demonstrate that in vitro data, depending on the applied materials and the methods for determination of IC(100%), can easily be misinterpreted as reduced bacterial susceptibility towards OCT. MDPI 2022-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9686575/ /pubmed/36421309 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111665 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vejzovic, Djenana
Iftic, Azra
Ön, Ayse
Semeraro, Enrico F.
Malanovic, Nermina
Octenidine’s Efficacy: A Matter of Interpretation or the Influence of Experimental Setups?
title Octenidine’s Efficacy: A Matter of Interpretation or the Influence of Experimental Setups?
title_full Octenidine’s Efficacy: A Matter of Interpretation or the Influence of Experimental Setups?
title_fullStr Octenidine’s Efficacy: A Matter of Interpretation or the Influence of Experimental Setups?
title_full_unstemmed Octenidine’s Efficacy: A Matter of Interpretation or the Influence of Experimental Setups?
title_short Octenidine’s Efficacy: A Matter of Interpretation or the Influence of Experimental Setups?
title_sort octenidine’s efficacy: a matter of interpretation or the influence of experimental setups?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9686575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36421309
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111665
work_keys_str_mv AT vejzovicdjenana octenidinesefficacyamatterofinterpretationortheinfluenceofexperimentalsetups
AT ifticazra octenidinesefficacyamatterofinterpretationortheinfluenceofexperimentalsetups
AT onayse octenidinesefficacyamatterofinterpretationortheinfluenceofexperimentalsetups
AT semeraroenricof octenidinesefficacyamatterofinterpretationortheinfluenceofexperimentalsetups
AT malanovicnermina octenidinesefficacyamatterofinterpretationortheinfluenceofexperimentalsetups