Cargando…

The Inflammation Level and a Microbiological Analysis of the Anophthalmic Cavities of Unilateral Ocular Prosthesis Users: A Blind, Randomized Observational Study

Irritation and biofilm adhesion are complaints associated with ocular prosthesis use. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of prosthesis repolishing on several conditions of anophthalmic volunteers. Participants were divided into two groups: intervention (IG, n = 10) and nonintervention (NIG, n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Penitente, Paulo Augusto, Da Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas, Goiato, Marcelo Coelho, Maniçoba, Lorena Louise Pontes, Brito, Victor Gustavo Balera, Túrcio, Karina Helga Leal, Rodrigues, Alana Semenzin, Nagay, Bruna Egumi, Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9686759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36358141
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111486
_version_ 1784835833103122432
author Penitente, Paulo Augusto
Da Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho
Maniçoba, Lorena Louise Pontes
Brito, Victor Gustavo Balera
Túrcio, Karina Helga Leal
Rodrigues, Alana Semenzin
Nagay, Bruna Egumi
Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline
author_facet Penitente, Paulo Augusto
Da Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho
Maniçoba, Lorena Louise Pontes
Brito, Victor Gustavo Balera
Túrcio, Karina Helga Leal
Rodrigues, Alana Semenzin
Nagay, Bruna Egumi
Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline
author_sort Penitente, Paulo Augusto
collection PubMed
description Irritation and biofilm adhesion are complaints associated with ocular prosthesis use. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of prosthesis repolishing on several conditions of anophthalmic volunteers. Participants were divided into two groups: intervention (IG, n = 10) and nonintervention (NIG, n = 6) groups. The anophthalmic cavity, contralateral eye, and prosthesis surface were evaluated at initial, day 15, and day 30 after repolishing. Microbiological analysis (colony-forming units), exfoliative cytology (conjunctiva inflammatory cells), sensory analysis (quantitative mechanical sensory test), tear production (Schirmer’s test), and conjunctival inflammation (clinical evaluation) were performed. Nonparametric tests were used to compare groups in the initial period and to analyze periods for the IG (p < 0.05). More microorganisms were formed in the anophthalmic socket and prosthesis than in the contralateral eye in the initial period. For IG, the anophthalmic cavity exhibited more microorganisms and inflammatory clinical signs in the initial period than at 15 and 30 after repolishing. The prosthesis showed greater accumulations of total bacteria and Candida albicans in the initial period than at 15 and 30 days after repolishing. The anophthalmic cavity had more palpebral inflammation than the contralateral eye. In conclusion, repolishing reduced the number of microorganisms and inflammatory signs over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9686759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96867592022-11-25 The Inflammation Level and a Microbiological Analysis of the Anophthalmic Cavities of Unilateral Ocular Prosthesis Users: A Blind, Randomized Observational Study Penitente, Paulo Augusto Da Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas Goiato, Marcelo Coelho Maniçoba, Lorena Louise Pontes Brito, Victor Gustavo Balera Túrcio, Karina Helga Leal Rodrigues, Alana Semenzin Nagay, Bruna Egumi Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline Antibiotics (Basel) Article Irritation and biofilm adhesion are complaints associated with ocular prosthesis use. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of prosthesis repolishing on several conditions of anophthalmic volunteers. Participants were divided into two groups: intervention (IG, n = 10) and nonintervention (NIG, n = 6) groups. The anophthalmic cavity, contralateral eye, and prosthesis surface were evaluated at initial, day 15, and day 30 after repolishing. Microbiological analysis (colony-forming units), exfoliative cytology (conjunctiva inflammatory cells), sensory analysis (quantitative mechanical sensory test), tear production (Schirmer’s test), and conjunctival inflammation (clinical evaluation) were performed. Nonparametric tests were used to compare groups in the initial period and to analyze periods for the IG (p < 0.05). More microorganisms were formed in the anophthalmic socket and prosthesis than in the contralateral eye in the initial period. For IG, the anophthalmic cavity exhibited more microorganisms and inflammatory clinical signs in the initial period than at 15 and 30 after repolishing. The prosthesis showed greater accumulations of total bacteria and Candida albicans in the initial period than at 15 and 30 days after repolishing. The anophthalmic cavity had more palpebral inflammation than the contralateral eye. In conclusion, repolishing reduced the number of microorganisms and inflammatory signs over time. MDPI 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9686759/ /pubmed/36358141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111486 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Penitente, Paulo Augusto
Da Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho
Maniçoba, Lorena Louise Pontes
Brito, Victor Gustavo Balera
Túrcio, Karina Helga Leal
Rodrigues, Alana Semenzin
Nagay, Bruna Egumi
Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline
The Inflammation Level and a Microbiological Analysis of the Anophthalmic Cavities of Unilateral Ocular Prosthesis Users: A Blind, Randomized Observational Study
title The Inflammation Level and a Microbiological Analysis of the Anophthalmic Cavities of Unilateral Ocular Prosthesis Users: A Blind, Randomized Observational Study
title_full The Inflammation Level and a Microbiological Analysis of the Anophthalmic Cavities of Unilateral Ocular Prosthesis Users: A Blind, Randomized Observational Study
title_fullStr The Inflammation Level and a Microbiological Analysis of the Anophthalmic Cavities of Unilateral Ocular Prosthesis Users: A Blind, Randomized Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed The Inflammation Level and a Microbiological Analysis of the Anophthalmic Cavities of Unilateral Ocular Prosthesis Users: A Blind, Randomized Observational Study
title_short The Inflammation Level and a Microbiological Analysis of the Anophthalmic Cavities of Unilateral Ocular Prosthesis Users: A Blind, Randomized Observational Study
title_sort inflammation level and a microbiological analysis of the anophthalmic cavities of unilateral ocular prosthesis users: a blind, randomized observational study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9686759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36358141
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111486
work_keys_str_mv AT penitentepauloaugusto theinflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT dasilvaemilyviviannefreitas theinflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT goiatomarcelocoelho theinflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT manicobalorenalouisepontes theinflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT britovictorgustavobalera theinflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT turciokarinahelgaleal theinflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT rodriguesalanasemenzin theinflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT nagaybrunaegumi theinflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT dossantosdanielamicheline theinflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT penitentepauloaugusto inflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT dasilvaemilyviviannefreitas inflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT goiatomarcelocoelho inflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT manicobalorenalouisepontes inflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT britovictorgustavobalera inflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT turciokarinahelgaleal inflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT rodriguesalanasemenzin inflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT nagaybrunaegumi inflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy
AT dossantosdanielamicheline inflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy