Cargando…
The Inflammation Level and a Microbiological Analysis of the Anophthalmic Cavities of Unilateral Ocular Prosthesis Users: A Blind, Randomized Observational Study
Irritation and biofilm adhesion are complaints associated with ocular prosthesis use. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of prosthesis repolishing on several conditions of anophthalmic volunteers. Participants were divided into two groups: intervention (IG, n = 10) and nonintervention (NIG, n...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9686759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36358141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111486 |
_version_ | 1784835833103122432 |
---|---|
author | Penitente, Paulo Augusto Da Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas Goiato, Marcelo Coelho Maniçoba, Lorena Louise Pontes Brito, Victor Gustavo Balera Túrcio, Karina Helga Leal Rodrigues, Alana Semenzin Nagay, Bruna Egumi Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline |
author_facet | Penitente, Paulo Augusto Da Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas Goiato, Marcelo Coelho Maniçoba, Lorena Louise Pontes Brito, Victor Gustavo Balera Túrcio, Karina Helga Leal Rodrigues, Alana Semenzin Nagay, Bruna Egumi Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline |
author_sort | Penitente, Paulo Augusto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Irritation and biofilm adhesion are complaints associated with ocular prosthesis use. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of prosthesis repolishing on several conditions of anophthalmic volunteers. Participants were divided into two groups: intervention (IG, n = 10) and nonintervention (NIG, n = 6) groups. The anophthalmic cavity, contralateral eye, and prosthesis surface were evaluated at initial, day 15, and day 30 after repolishing. Microbiological analysis (colony-forming units), exfoliative cytology (conjunctiva inflammatory cells), sensory analysis (quantitative mechanical sensory test), tear production (Schirmer’s test), and conjunctival inflammation (clinical evaluation) were performed. Nonparametric tests were used to compare groups in the initial period and to analyze periods for the IG (p < 0.05). More microorganisms were formed in the anophthalmic socket and prosthesis than in the contralateral eye in the initial period. For IG, the anophthalmic cavity exhibited more microorganisms and inflammatory clinical signs in the initial period than at 15 and 30 after repolishing. The prosthesis showed greater accumulations of total bacteria and Candida albicans in the initial period than at 15 and 30 days after repolishing. The anophthalmic cavity had more palpebral inflammation than the contralateral eye. In conclusion, repolishing reduced the number of microorganisms and inflammatory signs over time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9686759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96867592022-11-25 The Inflammation Level and a Microbiological Analysis of the Anophthalmic Cavities of Unilateral Ocular Prosthesis Users: A Blind, Randomized Observational Study Penitente, Paulo Augusto Da Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas Goiato, Marcelo Coelho Maniçoba, Lorena Louise Pontes Brito, Victor Gustavo Balera Túrcio, Karina Helga Leal Rodrigues, Alana Semenzin Nagay, Bruna Egumi Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline Antibiotics (Basel) Article Irritation and biofilm adhesion are complaints associated with ocular prosthesis use. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of prosthesis repolishing on several conditions of anophthalmic volunteers. Participants were divided into two groups: intervention (IG, n = 10) and nonintervention (NIG, n = 6) groups. The anophthalmic cavity, contralateral eye, and prosthesis surface were evaluated at initial, day 15, and day 30 after repolishing. Microbiological analysis (colony-forming units), exfoliative cytology (conjunctiva inflammatory cells), sensory analysis (quantitative mechanical sensory test), tear production (Schirmer’s test), and conjunctival inflammation (clinical evaluation) were performed. Nonparametric tests were used to compare groups in the initial period and to analyze periods for the IG (p < 0.05). More microorganisms were formed in the anophthalmic socket and prosthesis than in the contralateral eye in the initial period. For IG, the anophthalmic cavity exhibited more microorganisms and inflammatory clinical signs in the initial period than at 15 and 30 after repolishing. The prosthesis showed greater accumulations of total bacteria and Candida albicans in the initial period than at 15 and 30 days after repolishing. The anophthalmic cavity had more palpebral inflammation than the contralateral eye. In conclusion, repolishing reduced the number of microorganisms and inflammatory signs over time. MDPI 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9686759/ /pubmed/36358141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111486 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Penitente, Paulo Augusto Da Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas Goiato, Marcelo Coelho Maniçoba, Lorena Louise Pontes Brito, Victor Gustavo Balera Túrcio, Karina Helga Leal Rodrigues, Alana Semenzin Nagay, Bruna Egumi Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline The Inflammation Level and a Microbiological Analysis of the Anophthalmic Cavities of Unilateral Ocular Prosthesis Users: A Blind, Randomized Observational Study |
title | The Inflammation Level and a Microbiological Analysis of the Anophthalmic Cavities of Unilateral Ocular Prosthesis Users: A Blind, Randomized Observational Study |
title_full | The Inflammation Level and a Microbiological Analysis of the Anophthalmic Cavities of Unilateral Ocular Prosthesis Users: A Blind, Randomized Observational Study |
title_fullStr | The Inflammation Level and a Microbiological Analysis of the Anophthalmic Cavities of Unilateral Ocular Prosthesis Users: A Blind, Randomized Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Inflammation Level and a Microbiological Analysis of the Anophthalmic Cavities of Unilateral Ocular Prosthesis Users: A Blind, Randomized Observational Study |
title_short | The Inflammation Level and a Microbiological Analysis of the Anophthalmic Cavities of Unilateral Ocular Prosthesis Users: A Blind, Randomized Observational Study |
title_sort | inflammation level and a microbiological analysis of the anophthalmic cavities of unilateral ocular prosthesis users: a blind, randomized observational study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9686759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36358141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111486 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT penitentepauloaugusto theinflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy AT dasilvaemilyviviannefreitas theinflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy AT goiatomarcelocoelho theinflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy AT manicobalorenalouisepontes theinflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy AT britovictorgustavobalera theinflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy AT turciokarinahelgaleal theinflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy AT rodriguesalanasemenzin theinflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy AT nagaybrunaegumi theinflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy AT dossantosdanielamicheline theinflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy AT penitentepauloaugusto inflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy AT dasilvaemilyviviannefreitas inflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy AT goiatomarcelocoelho inflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy AT manicobalorenalouisepontes inflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy AT britovictorgustavobalera inflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy AT turciokarinahelgaleal inflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy AT rodriguesalanasemenzin inflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy AT nagaybrunaegumi inflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy AT dossantosdanielamicheline inflammationlevelandamicrobiologicalanalysisoftheanophthalmiccavitiesofunilateralocularprosthesisusersablindrandomizedobservationalstudy |