Cargando…

An Objective and Repeatable Sac Isolation Technique for Comparing Biomechanical Metrics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

(1) Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) biomechanics-based metrics often reported may be over/under-estimated by including non-aneurysmal regions in the analyses, which is typical, rather than isolating the dilated sac region. We demonstrate the utility of a novel sac-isolation algorithm by comparing pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Timothy K., Gueldner, Pete H., Kickliter, Trevor M., Liang, Nathan L., Vorp, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9687639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36354512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9110601
_version_ 1784836057580175360
author Chung, Timothy K.
Gueldner, Pete H.
Kickliter, Trevor M.
Liang, Nathan L.
Vorp, David A.
author_facet Chung, Timothy K.
Gueldner, Pete H.
Kickliter, Trevor M.
Liang, Nathan L.
Vorp, David A.
author_sort Chung, Timothy K.
collection PubMed
description (1) Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) biomechanics-based metrics often reported may be over/under-estimated by including non-aneurysmal regions in the analyses, which is typical, rather than isolating the dilated sac region. We demonstrate the utility of a novel sac-isolation algorithm by comparing peak/mean wall stress (PWS, MWS), with/without sac isolation, for AAA that were categorized as stable or unstable in 245 patient CT image sets. (2) 245 patient computed tomography images were collected, segmented, meshed, and had subsequent finite element analysis performed in preparation of our novel sac isolation technique. Sac isolation was initiated by rotating 3D surfaces incrementally, extracting 2D projections, curve fitting a Fourier series, and taking the local extrema as superior/inferior boundaries for the aneurysmal sac. The PWS/MWS were compared pairwise using the entire aneurysm and the isolated sac alone. (3) MWS, not PWS, was significantly different between the sac alone and the entire aneurysm. We found no statistically significant difference in wall stress measures between stable (n = 222) and unstable (n = 23) groups using the entire aneurysm. However, using sac-isolation, PWS (24.6 ± 7.06 vs. 20.5 ± 8.04 N/cm(2); p = 0.003) and MWS (12.0 ± 3.63 vs. 10.5 ± 4.11 N/cm(2); p = 0.022) were both significantly higher in unstable vs. stable groups. (4) Our results suggest that evaluating only the AAA sac can influence wall stress metrics and may reveal differences in stable and unstable groups of aneurysms that may not otherwise be detected when the entire aneurysm is used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9687639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96876392022-11-25 An Objective and Repeatable Sac Isolation Technique for Comparing Biomechanical Metrics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Chung, Timothy K. Gueldner, Pete H. Kickliter, Trevor M. Liang, Nathan L. Vorp, David A. Bioengineering (Basel) Article (1) Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) biomechanics-based metrics often reported may be over/under-estimated by including non-aneurysmal regions in the analyses, which is typical, rather than isolating the dilated sac region. We demonstrate the utility of a novel sac-isolation algorithm by comparing peak/mean wall stress (PWS, MWS), with/without sac isolation, for AAA that were categorized as stable or unstable in 245 patient CT image sets. (2) 245 patient computed tomography images were collected, segmented, meshed, and had subsequent finite element analysis performed in preparation of our novel sac isolation technique. Sac isolation was initiated by rotating 3D surfaces incrementally, extracting 2D projections, curve fitting a Fourier series, and taking the local extrema as superior/inferior boundaries for the aneurysmal sac. The PWS/MWS were compared pairwise using the entire aneurysm and the isolated sac alone. (3) MWS, not PWS, was significantly different between the sac alone and the entire aneurysm. We found no statistically significant difference in wall stress measures between stable (n = 222) and unstable (n = 23) groups using the entire aneurysm. However, using sac-isolation, PWS (24.6 ± 7.06 vs. 20.5 ± 8.04 N/cm(2); p = 0.003) and MWS (12.0 ± 3.63 vs. 10.5 ± 4.11 N/cm(2); p = 0.022) were both significantly higher in unstable vs. stable groups. (4) Our results suggest that evaluating only the AAA sac can influence wall stress metrics and may reveal differences in stable and unstable groups of aneurysms that may not otherwise be detected when the entire aneurysm is used. MDPI 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9687639/ /pubmed/36354512 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9110601 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chung, Timothy K.
Gueldner, Pete H.
Kickliter, Trevor M.
Liang, Nathan L.
Vorp, David A.
An Objective and Repeatable Sac Isolation Technique for Comparing Biomechanical Metrics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
title An Objective and Repeatable Sac Isolation Technique for Comparing Biomechanical Metrics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
title_full An Objective and Repeatable Sac Isolation Technique for Comparing Biomechanical Metrics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
title_fullStr An Objective and Repeatable Sac Isolation Technique for Comparing Biomechanical Metrics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
title_full_unstemmed An Objective and Repeatable Sac Isolation Technique for Comparing Biomechanical Metrics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
title_short An Objective and Repeatable Sac Isolation Technique for Comparing Biomechanical Metrics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
title_sort objective and repeatable sac isolation technique for comparing biomechanical metrics in abdominal aortic aneurysms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9687639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36354512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9110601
work_keys_str_mv AT chungtimothyk anobjectiveandrepeatablesacisolationtechniqueforcomparingbiomechanicalmetricsinabdominalaorticaneurysms
AT gueldnerpeteh anobjectiveandrepeatablesacisolationtechniqueforcomparingbiomechanicalmetricsinabdominalaorticaneurysms
AT kicklitertrevorm anobjectiveandrepeatablesacisolationtechniqueforcomparingbiomechanicalmetricsinabdominalaorticaneurysms
AT liangnathanl anobjectiveandrepeatablesacisolationtechniqueforcomparingbiomechanicalmetricsinabdominalaorticaneurysms
AT vorpdavida anobjectiveandrepeatablesacisolationtechniqueforcomparingbiomechanicalmetricsinabdominalaorticaneurysms
AT chungtimothyk objectiveandrepeatablesacisolationtechniqueforcomparingbiomechanicalmetricsinabdominalaorticaneurysms
AT gueldnerpeteh objectiveandrepeatablesacisolationtechniqueforcomparingbiomechanicalmetricsinabdominalaorticaneurysms
AT kicklitertrevorm objectiveandrepeatablesacisolationtechniqueforcomparingbiomechanicalmetricsinabdominalaorticaneurysms
AT liangnathanl objectiveandrepeatablesacisolationtechniqueforcomparingbiomechanicalmetricsinabdominalaorticaneurysms
AT vorpdavida objectiveandrepeatablesacisolationtechniqueforcomparingbiomechanicalmetricsinabdominalaorticaneurysms