Cargando…

Responsive Neurostimulation for Seizure Control: Current Status and Future Directions

Electrocorticography (ECoG) data are commonly obtained during drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) workup, in which subdural grids and stereotaxic depth electrodes are placed on the cortex for weeks at a time, with the goal of elucidating seizure origination. ECoG data can also be recorded from neuromodula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boddeti, Ujwal, McAfee, Darrian, Khan, Anas, Bachani, Muzna, Ksendzovsky, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9687706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359197
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112677
_version_ 1784836075833786368
author Boddeti, Ujwal
McAfee, Darrian
Khan, Anas
Bachani, Muzna
Ksendzovsky, Alexander
author_facet Boddeti, Ujwal
McAfee, Darrian
Khan, Anas
Bachani, Muzna
Ksendzovsky, Alexander
author_sort Boddeti, Ujwal
collection PubMed
description Electrocorticography (ECoG) data are commonly obtained during drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) workup, in which subdural grids and stereotaxic depth electrodes are placed on the cortex for weeks at a time, with the goal of elucidating seizure origination. ECoG data can also be recorded from neuromodulatory devices, such as responsive neurostimulation (RNS), which involves the placement of electrodes deep in the brain. Of the neuromodulatory devices, RNS is the first to use recorded ECoG data to direct the delivery of electrical stimulation in order to control seizures. In this review, we first introduced the clinical management for epilepsy, and discussed the steps from seizure onset to surgical intervention. We then reviewed studies discussing the emergence and therapeutic mechanism behind RNS, and discussed why RNS may be underperforming despite an improved seizure detection mechanism. We discussed the potential utility of incorporating machine learning techniques to improve seizure detection in RNS, and the necessity to change RNS targets for stimulation, in order to account for the network theory of epilepsy. We concluded by commenting on the current and future status of neuromodulation in managing epilepsy, and the role of predictive algorithms to improve outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9687706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96877062022-11-25 Responsive Neurostimulation for Seizure Control: Current Status and Future Directions Boddeti, Ujwal McAfee, Darrian Khan, Anas Bachani, Muzna Ksendzovsky, Alexander Biomedicines Review Electrocorticography (ECoG) data are commonly obtained during drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) workup, in which subdural grids and stereotaxic depth electrodes are placed on the cortex for weeks at a time, with the goal of elucidating seizure origination. ECoG data can also be recorded from neuromodulatory devices, such as responsive neurostimulation (RNS), which involves the placement of electrodes deep in the brain. Of the neuromodulatory devices, RNS is the first to use recorded ECoG data to direct the delivery of electrical stimulation in order to control seizures. In this review, we first introduced the clinical management for epilepsy, and discussed the steps from seizure onset to surgical intervention. We then reviewed studies discussing the emergence and therapeutic mechanism behind RNS, and discussed why RNS may be underperforming despite an improved seizure detection mechanism. We discussed the potential utility of incorporating machine learning techniques to improve seizure detection in RNS, and the necessity to change RNS targets for stimulation, in order to account for the network theory of epilepsy. We concluded by commenting on the current and future status of neuromodulation in managing epilepsy, and the role of predictive algorithms to improve outcomes. MDPI 2022-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9687706/ /pubmed/36359197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112677 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Boddeti, Ujwal
McAfee, Darrian
Khan, Anas
Bachani, Muzna
Ksendzovsky, Alexander
Responsive Neurostimulation for Seizure Control: Current Status and Future Directions
title Responsive Neurostimulation for Seizure Control: Current Status and Future Directions
title_full Responsive Neurostimulation for Seizure Control: Current Status and Future Directions
title_fullStr Responsive Neurostimulation for Seizure Control: Current Status and Future Directions
title_full_unstemmed Responsive Neurostimulation for Seizure Control: Current Status and Future Directions
title_short Responsive Neurostimulation for Seizure Control: Current Status and Future Directions
title_sort responsive neurostimulation for seizure control: current status and future directions
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9687706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359197
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112677
work_keys_str_mv AT boddetiujwal responsiveneurostimulationforseizurecontrolcurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT mcafeedarrian responsiveneurostimulationforseizurecontrolcurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT khananas responsiveneurostimulationforseizurecontrolcurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT bachanimuzna responsiveneurostimulationforseizurecontrolcurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT ksendzovskyalexander responsiveneurostimulationforseizurecontrolcurrentstatusandfuturedirections