Cargando…
Responsive Neurostimulation for Seizure Control: Current Status and Future Directions
Electrocorticography (ECoG) data are commonly obtained during drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) workup, in which subdural grids and stereotaxic depth electrodes are placed on the cortex for weeks at a time, with the goal of elucidating seizure origination. ECoG data can also be recorded from neuromodula...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9687706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112677 |
_version_ | 1784836075833786368 |
---|---|
author | Boddeti, Ujwal McAfee, Darrian Khan, Anas Bachani, Muzna Ksendzovsky, Alexander |
author_facet | Boddeti, Ujwal McAfee, Darrian Khan, Anas Bachani, Muzna Ksendzovsky, Alexander |
author_sort | Boddeti, Ujwal |
collection | PubMed |
description | Electrocorticography (ECoG) data are commonly obtained during drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) workup, in which subdural grids and stereotaxic depth electrodes are placed on the cortex for weeks at a time, with the goal of elucidating seizure origination. ECoG data can also be recorded from neuromodulatory devices, such as responsive neurostimulation (RNS), which involves the placement of electrodes deep in the brain. Of the neuromodulatory devices, RNS is the first to use recorded ECoG data to direct the delivery of electrical stimulation in order to control seizures. In this review, we first introduced the clinical management for epilepsy, and discussed the steps from seizure onset to surgical intervention. We then reviewed studies discussing the emergence and therapeutic mechanism behind RNS, and discussed why RNS may be underperforming despite an improved seizure detection mechanism. We discussed the potential utility of incorporating machine learning techniques to improve seizure detection in RNS, and the necessity to change RNS targets for stimulation, in order to account for the network theory of epilepsy. We concluded by commenting on the current and future status of neuromodulation in managing epilepsy, and the role of predictive algorithms to improve outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9687706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96877062022-11-25 Responsive Neurostimulation for Seizure Control: Current Status and Future Directions Boddeti, Ujwal McAfee, Darrian Khan, Anas Bachani, Muzna Ksendzovsky, Alexander Biomedicines Review Electrocorticography (ECoG) data are commonly obtained during drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) workup, in which subdural grids and stereotaxic depth electrodes are placed on the cortex for weeks at a time, with the goal of elucidating seizure origination. ECoG data can also be recorded from neuromodulatory devices, such as responsive neurostimulation (RNS), which involves the placement of electrodes deep in the brain. Of the neuromodulatory devices, RNS is the first to use recorded ECoG data to direct the delivery of electrical stimulation in order to control seizures. In this review, we first introduced the clinical management for epilepsy, and discussed the steps from seizure onset to surgical intervention. We then reviewed studies discussing the emergence and therapeutic mechanism behind RNS, and discussed why RNS may be underperforming despite an improved seizure detection mechanism. We discussed the potential utility of incorporating machine learning techniques to improve seizure detection in RNS, and the necessity to change RNS targets for stimulation, in order to account for the network theory of epilepsy. We concluded by commenting on the current and future status of neuromodulation in managing epilepsy, and the role of predictive algorithms to improve outcomes. MDPI 2022-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9687706/ /pubmed/36359197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112677 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Boddeti, Ujwal McAfee, Darrian Khan, Anas Bachani, Muzna Ksendzovsky, Alexander Responsive Neurostimulation for Seizure Control: Current Status and Future Directions |
title | Responsive Neurostimulation for Seizure Control: Current Status and Future Directions |
title_full | Responsive Neurostimulation for Seizure Control: Current Status and Future Directions |
title_fullStr | Responsive Neurostimulation for Seizure Control: Current Status and Future Directions |
title_full_unstemmed | Responsive Neurostimulation for Seizure Control: Current Status and Future Directions |
title_short | Responsive Neurostimulation for Seizure Control: Current Status and Future Directions |
title_sort | responsive neurostimulation for seizure control: current status and future directions |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9687706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112677 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boddetiujwal responsiveneurostimulationforseizurecontrolcurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT mcafeedarrian responsiveneurostimulationforseizurecontrolcurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT khananas responsiveneurostimulationforseizurecontrolcurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT bachanimuzna responsiveneurostimulationforseizurecontrolcurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT ksendzovskyalexander responsiveneurostimulationforseizurecontrolcurrentstatusandfuturedirections |