Cargando…

Screening of Hydroxyapatite Biomaterials for Alveolar Augmentation Using a Rat Calvaria Critical-Size Defect Model: Bone Formation/Maturation and Biomaterials Resolution

Background: Natural (bovine-/equine-/porcine-derived) or synthetic hydroxyapatite (HA) biomaterials appear to be the preferred technologies among clinicians for bone augmentation procedures in preparation for implant dentistry. The aim of this study was to screen candidate HA biomaterials intended f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Susin, Cristiano, Lee, Jaebum, Fiorini, Tiago, Koo, Ki-Tae, Schüpbach, Peter, Finger Stadler, Amanda, Wikesjö, Ulf ME
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9687935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36421691
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom12111677
_version_ 1784836138886758400
author Susin, Cristiano
Lee, Jaebum
Fiorini, Tiago
Koo, Ki-Tae
Schüpbach, Peter
Finger Stadler, Amanda
Wikesjö, Ulf ME
author_facet Susin, Cristiano
Lee, Jaebum
Fiorini, Tiago
Koo, Ki-Tae
Schüpbach, Peter
Finger Stadler, Amanda
Wikesjö, Ulf ME
author_sort Susin, Cristiano
collection PubMed
description Background: Natural (bovine-/equine-/porcine-derived) or synthetic hydroxyapatite (HA) biomaterials appear to be the preferred technologies among clinicians for bone augmentation procedures in preparation for implant dentistry. The aim of this study was to screen candidate HA biomaterials intended for alveolar ridge augmentation relative to their potential to support local bone formation/maturation and to assess biomaterial resorption using a routine critical-size rat calvaria defect model. Methods: Eighty adult male Sprague Dawley outbred rats obtained from a approved-breeder, randomized into groups of ten, were used. The calvaria defects (ø8 mm) either received sham surgery (empty control), Bio-Oss (bovine HA/reference control), or candidate biomaterials including bovine HA (Cerabone, DirectOss, 403Z013), and bovine (403Z014) or synthetic HA/ß-TCP (Reprobone, Ceraball) constructs. An 8 wk healing interval was used to capture the biomaterials’ resolution. Results: All biomaterials displayed biocompatibility. Strict HA biomaterials showed limited, if any, signs of biodegradation/resorption, with the biomaterial area fraction ranging from 22% to 42%. Synthetic HA/ß-TCP constructs showed limited evidence of biodegradation/erosion (biomaterial area fraction ≈30%). Mean linear defect closure in the sham-surgery control approximated 40%. Mean linear defect closure for the Bio-Oss reference control approximated 18% compared with 15–35% for the candidate biomaterials without significant differences between the controls and candidate biomaterials. Conclusions: None of the candidate HA biomaterials supported local bone formation/maturation beyond the native regenerative potential of this rodent model, pointing to their limitations for regenerative procedures. Biocompatibility and biomaterial dimensional stability could suggest their potential utility as long-term defect fillers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9687935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96879352022-11-25 Screening of Hydroxyapatite Biomaterials for Alveolar Augmentation Using a Rat Calvaria Critical-Size Defect Model: Bone Formation/Maturation and Biomaterials Resolution Susin, Cristiano Lee, Jaebum Fiorini, Tiago Koo, Ki-Tae Schüpbach, Peter Finger Stadler, Amanda Wikesjö, Ulf ME Biomolecules Article Background: Natural (bovine-/equine-/porcine-derived) or synthetic hydroxyapatite (HA) biomaterials appear to be the preferred technologies among clinicians for bone augmentation procedures in preparation for implant dentistry. The aim of this study was to screen candidate HA biomaterials intended for alveolar ridge augmentation relative to their potential to support local bone formation/maturation and to assess biomaterial resorption using a routine critical-size rat calvaria defect model. Methods: Eighty adult male Sprague Dawley outbred rats obtained from a approved-breeder, randomized into groups of ten, were used. The calvaria defects (ø8 mm) either received sham surgery (empty control), Bio-Oss (bovine HA/reference control), or candidate biomaterials including bovine HA (Cerabone, DirectOss, 403Z013), and bovine (403Z014) or synthetic HA/ß-TCP (Reprobone, Ceraball) constructs. An 8 wk healing interval was used to capture the biomaterials’ resolution. Results: All biomaterials displayed biocompatibility. Strict HA biomaterials showed limited, if any, signs of biodegradation/resorption, with the biomaterial area fraction ranging from 22% to 42%. Synthetic HA/ß-TCP constructs showed limited evidence of biodegradation/erosion (biomaterial area fraction ≈30%). Mean linear defect closure in the sham-surgery control approximated 40%. Mean linear defect closure for the Bio-Oss reference control approximated 18% compared with 15–35% for the candidate biomaterials without significant differences between the controls and candidate biomaterials. Conclusions: None of the candidate HA biomaterials supported local bone formation/maturation beyond the native regenerative potential of this rodent model, pointing to their limitations for regenerative procedures. Biocompatibility and biomaterial dimensional stability could suggest their potential utility as long-term defect fillers. MDPI 2022-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9687935/ /pubmed/36421691 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom12111677 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Susin, Cristiano
Lee, Jaebum
Fiorini, Tiago
Koo, Ki-Tae
Schüpbach, Peter
Finger Stadler, Amanda
Wikesjö, Ulf ME
Screening of Hydroxyapatite Biomaterials for Alveolar Augmentation Using a Rat Calvaria Critical-Size Defect Model: Bone Formation/Maturation and Biomaterials Resolution
title Screening of Hydroxyapatite Biomaterials for Alveolar Augmentation Using a Rat Calvaria Critical-Size Defect Model: Bone Formation/Maturation and Biomaterials Resolution
title_full Screening of Hydroxyapatite Biomaterials for Alveolar Augmentation Using a Rat Calvaria Critical-Size Defect Model: Bone Formation/Maturation and Biomaterials Resolution
title_fullStr Screening of Hydroxyapatite Biomaterials for Alveolar Augmentation Using a Rat Calvaria Critical-Size Defect Model: Bone Formation/Maturation and Biomaterials Resolution
title_full_unstemmed Screening of Hydroxyapatite Biomaterials for Alveolar Augmentation Using a Rat Calvaria Critical-Size Defect Model: Bone Formation/Maturation and Biomaterials Resolution
title_short Screening of Hydroxyapatite Biomaterials for Alveolar Augmentation Using a Rat Calvaria Critical-Size Defect Model: Bone Formation/Maturation and Biomaterials Resolution
title_sort screening of hydroxyapatite biomaterials for alveolar augmentation using a rat calvaria critical-size defect model: bone formation/maturation and biomaterials resolution
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9687935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36421691
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom12111677
work_keys_str_mv AT susincristiano screeningofhydroxyapatitebiomaterialsforalveolaraugmentationusingaratcalvariacriticalsizedefectmodelboneformationmaturationandbiomaterialsresolution
AT leejaebum screeningofhydroxyapatitebiomaterialsforalveolaraugmentationusingaratcalvariacriticalsizedefectmodelboneformationmaturationandbiomaterialsresolution
AT fiorinitiago screeningofhydroxyapatitebiomaterialsforalveolaraugmentationusingaratcalvariacriticalsizedefectmodelboneformationmaturationandbiomaterialsresolution
AT kookitae screeningofhydroxyapatitebiomaterialsforalveolaraugmentationusingaratcalvariacriticalsizedefectmodelboneformationmaturationandbiomaterialsresolution
AT schupbachpeter screeningofhydroxyapatitebiomaterialsforalveolaraugmentationusingaratcalvariacriticalsizedefectmodelboneformationmaturationandbiomaterialsresolution
AT fingerstadleramanda screeningofhydroxyapatitebiomaterialsforalveolaraugmentationusingaratcalvariacriticalsizedefectmodelboneformationmaturationandbiomaterialsresolution
AT wikesjoulfme screeningofhydroxyapatitebiomaterialsforalveolaraugmentationusingaratcalvariacriticalsizedefectmodelboneformationmaturationandbiomaterialsresolution