Cargando…

Neurophysiological Hallmarks of Axonal Degeneration in CIDP Patients: A Pilot Analysis

In this work, we aim to identify sensitive neurophysiological biomarkers of axonal degeneration in CIDP patients. A total of 16 CIDP patients, fulfilling the clinical and neurophysiological criteria for typical CIDP, treated with subcutaneous immunoglobulin (ScIg) (0.4 g/kg/week) were evaluated at b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ricciardi, Dario, Amitrano, Federica, Coccia, Armando, Todisco, Vincenzo, Trojsi, Francesca, Tedeschi, Gioacchino, Cirillo, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9688174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36358436
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12111510
_version_ 1784836200719187968
author Ricciardi, Dario
Amitrano, Federica
Coccia, Armando
Todisco, Vincenzo
Trojsi, Francesca
Tedeschi, Gioacchino
Cirillo, Giovanni
author_facet Ricciardi, Dario
Amitrano, Federica
Coccia, Armando
Todisco, Vincenzo
Trojsi, Francesca
Tedeschi, Gioacchino
Cirillo, Giovanni
author_sort Ricciardi, Dario
collection PubMed
description In this work, we aim to identify sensitive neurophysiological biomarkers of axonal degeneration in CIDP patients. A total of 16 CIDP patients, fulfilling the clinical and neurophysiological criteria for typical CIDP, treated with subcutaneous immunoglobulin (ScIg) (0.4 g/kg/week) were evaluated at baseline (before ScIg treatment) and after long-term treatment with ScIg (24 months) by clinical assessment scales, nerve conduction studies (NCS) and electromyography (EMG). Conventional and non-conventional neurophysiological parameters: motor unit potential (MUP) analysis, MUP thickness and size index (SI)] and interference pattern (IP) features were evaluated after long-term treatment (24 months) and compared with a population of 16 healthy controls (HC). An increase of distal motor latency (DML) and reduced compound motor action potential (CMAP) amplitude and area in CIDP patients suggest axonal damage of motor fibers, together with a significant increase of MUP amplitude, duration and area. Analysis of non-conventional MUP parameters shows no difference for MUP thickness; however, in CIDP patients, SI is increased and IP area and amplitude values are lower than HC. Despite clinical and neurophysiological improvement after ScIg treatment, neurophysiological analysis revealed axonal degeneration of motor fibers and motor unit remodeling. Correlation analysis shows that the axonal degeneration process is related to the diagnostic and therapeutic delay. MUP area and SI parameters can detect early signs of axonal degeneration, and their introduction in clinical practice may help to identify patients with the worst outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9688174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96881742022-11-25 Neurophysiological Hallmarks of Axonal Degeneration in CIDP Patients: A Pilot Analysis Ricciardi, Dario Amitrano, Federica Coccia, Armando Todisco, Vincenzo Trojsi, Francesca Tedeschi, Gioacchino Cirillo, Giovanni Brain Sci Article In this work, we aim to identify sensitive neurophysiological biomarkers of axonal degeneration in CIDP patients. A total of 16 CIDP patients, fulfilling the clinical and neurophysiological criteria for typical CIDP, treated with subcutaneous immunoglobulin (ScIg) (0.4 g/kg/week) were evaluated at baseline (before ScIg treatment) and after long-term treatment with ScIg (24 months) by clinical assessment scales, nerve conduction studies (NCS) and electromyography (EMG). Conventional and non-conventional neurophysiological parameters: motor unit potential (MUP) analysis, MUP thickness and size index (SI)] and interference pattern (IP) features were evaluated after long-term treatment (24 months) and compared with a population of 16 healthy controls (HC). An increase of distal motor latency (DML) and reduced compound motor action potential (CMAP) amplitude and area in CIDP patients suggest axonal damage of motor fibers, together with a significant increase of MUP amplitude, duration and area. Analysis of non-conventional MUP parameters shows no difference for MUP thickness; however, in CIDP patients, SI is increased and IP area and amplitude values are lower than HC. Despite clinical and neurophysiological improvement after ScIg treatment, neurophysiological analysis revealed axonal degeneration of motor fibers and motor unit remodeling. Correlation analysis shows that the axonal degeneration process is related to the diagnostic and therapeutic delay. MUP area and SI parameters can detect early signs of axonal degeneration, and their introduction in clinical practice may help to identify patients with the worst outcome. MDPI 2022-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9688174/ /pubmed/36358436 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12111510 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ricciardi, Dario
Amitrano, Federica
Coccia, Armando
Todisco, Vincenzo
Trojsi, Francesca
Tedeschi, Gioacchino
Cirillo, Giovanni
Neurophysiological Hallmarks of Axonal Degeneration in CIDP Patients: A Pilot Analysis
title Neurophysiological Hallmarks of Axonal Degeneration in CIDP Patients: A Pilot Analysis
title_full Neurophysiological Hallmarks of Axonal Degeneration in CIDP Patients: A Pilot Analysis
title_fullStr Neurophysiological Hallmarks of Axonal Degeneration in CIDP Patients: A Pilot Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Neurophysiological Hallmarks of Axonal Degeneration in CIDP Patients: A Pilot Analysis
title_short Neurophysiological Hallmarks of Axonal Degeneration in CIDP Patients: A Pilot Analysis
title_sort neurophysiological hallmarks of axonal degeneration in cidp patients: a pilot analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9688174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36358436
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12111510
work_keys_str_mv AT ricciardidario neurophysiologicalhallmarksofaxonaldegenerationincidppatientsapilotanalysis
AT amitranofederica neurophysiologicalhallmarksofaxonaldegenerationincidppatientsapilotanalysis
AT cocciaarmando neurophysiologicalhallmarksofaxonaldegenerationincidppatientsapilotanalysis
AT todiscovincenzo neurophysiologicalhallmarksofaxonaldegenerationincidppatientsapilotanalysis
AT trojsifrancesca neurophysiologicalhallmarksofaxonaldegenerationincidppatientsapilotanalysis
AT tedeschigioacchino neurophysiologicalhallmarksofaxonaldegenerationincidppatientsapilotanalysis
AT cirillogiovanni neurophysiologicalhallmarksofaxonaldegenerationincidppatientsapilotanalysis