Cargando…
Central Venous Catheter Cannulation in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Prospective Observational Trial
Currently, ultrasound-guided central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is recommended in pediatric patients. However, the clinical practice may vary. The primary aim of this study was the overall success rate and the first attempt success rate in ultrasound-guided CVC insertion versus anatomic-based C...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9688764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36360339 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9111611 |
_version_ | 1784836351761317888 |
---|---|
author | Vafek, Václav Skříšovská, Tamara Kosinová, Martina Klabusayová, Eva Musilová, Tereza Kramplová, Tereza Djakow, Jana Klučka, Jozef Kalina, Jiří Štourač, Petr |
author_facet | Vafek, Václav Skříšovská, Tamara Kosinová, Martina Klabusayová, Eva Musilová, Tereza Kramplová, Tereza Djakow, Jana Klučka, Jozef Kalina, Jiří Štourač, Petr |
author_sort | Vafek, Václav |
collection | PubMed |
description | Currently, ultrasound-guided central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is recommended in pediatric patients. However, the clinical practice may vary. The primary aim of this study was the overall success rate and the first attempt success rate in ultrasound-guided CVC insertion versus anatomic-based CVC insertion in pediatric patients. The secondary aim was the incidence of associated complications and the procedural time. The physician could freely choose the cannulation method and venous approach. Data were collected for 10 months. Overall, 179 patients were assessed for eligibility and 107 patients were included. In almost half of the patients (48.6%), the percutaneous puncture was performed by real-time ultrasound navigation. In 51.4% of the patients, the puncture was performed by the landmark method. The overall success rate was 100% (n = 52) in the real-time ultrasound navigation group, 96.4% (n = 53) in the landmark insertion group, (p = 0.496). The first percutaneous puncture success rate was 57.7% (n = 30) in the real-time ultrasound navigation group and 45.5% (n = 25) in the landmark insertion group, (p = 0.460). The data show a higher overall success rate and the first success rate in the US-guided CVC insertion group, but the difference was not statistically significant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9688764 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96887642022-11-25 Central Venous Catheter Cannulation in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Prospective Observational Trial Vafek, Václav Skříšovská, Tamara Kosinová, Martina Klabusayová, Eva Musilová, Tereza Kramplová, Tereza Djakow, Jana Klučka, Jozef Kalina, Jiří Štourač, Petr Children (Basel) Article Currently, ultrasound-guided central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is recommended in pediatric patients. However, the clinical practice may vary. The primary aim of this study was the overall success rate and the first attempt success rate in ultrasound-guided CVC insertion versus anatomic-based CVC insertion in pediatric patients. The secondary aim was the incidence of associated complications and the procedural time. The physician could freely choose the cannulation method and venous approach. Data were collected for 10 months. Overall, 179 patients were assessed for eligibility and 107 patients were included. In almost half of the patients (48.6%), the percutaneous puncture was performed by real-time ultrasound navigation. In 51.4% of the patients, the puncture was performed by the landmark method. The overall success rate was 100% (n = 52) in the real-time ultrasound navigation group, 96.4% (n = 53) in the landmark insertion group, (p = 0.496). The first percutaneous puncture success rate was 57.7% (n = 30) in the real-time ultrasound navigation group and 45.5% (n = 25) in the landmark insertion group, (p = 0.460). The data show a higher overall success rate and the first success rate in the US-guided CVC insertion group, but the difference was not statistically significant. MDPI 2022-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9688764/ /pubmed/36360339 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9111611 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Vafek, Václav Skříšovská, Tamara Kosinová, Martina Klabusayová, Eva Musilová, Tereza Kramplová, Tereza Djakow, Jana Klučka, Jozef Kalina, Jiří Štourač, Petr Central Venous Catheter Cannulation in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Prospective Observational Trial |
title | Central Venous Catheter Cannulation in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Prospective Observational Trial |
title_full | Central Venous Catheter Cannulation in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Prospective Observational Trial |
title_fullStr | Central Venous Catheter Cannulation in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Prospective Observational Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Central Venous Catheter Cannulation in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Prospective Observational Trial |
title_short | Central Venous Catheter Cannulation in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Prospective Observational Trial |
title_sort | central venous catheter cannulation in pediatric anesthesia and intensive care: a prospective observational trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9688764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36360339 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9111611 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vafekvaclav centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial AT skrisovskatamara centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial AT kosinovamartina centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial AT klabusayovaeva centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial AT musilovatereza centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial AT kramplovatereza centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial AT djakowjana centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial AT kluckajozef centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial AT kalinajiri centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial AT stouracpetr centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial |