Cargando…

Central Venous Catheter Cannulation in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Prospective Observational Trial

Currently, ultrasound-guided central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is recommended in pediatric patients. However, the clinical practice may vary. The primary aim of this study was the overall success rate and the first attempt success rate in ultrasound-guided CVC insertion versus anatomic-based C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vafek, Václav, Skříšovská, Tamara, Kosinová, Martina, Klabusayová, Eva, Musilová, Tereza, Kramplová, Tereza, Djakow, Jana, Klučka, Jozef, Kalina, Jiří, Štourač, Petr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9688764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36360339
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9111611
_version_ 1784836351761317888
author Vafek, Václav
Skříšovská, Tamara
Kosinová, Martina
Klabusayová, Eva
Musilová, Tereza
Kramplová, Tereza
Djakow, Jana
Klučka, Jozef
Kalina, Jiří
Štourač, Petr
author_facet Vafek, Václav
Skříšovská, Tamara
Kosinová, Martina
Klabusayová, Eva
Musilová, Tereza
Kramplová, Tereza
Djakow, Jana
Klučka, Jozef
Kalina, Jiří
Štourač, Petr
author_sort Vafek, Václav
collection PubMed
description Currently, ultrasound-guided central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is recommended in pediatric patients. However, the clinical practice may vary. The primary aim of this study was the overall success rate and the first attempt success rate in ultrasound-guided CVC insertion versus anatomic-based CVC insertion in pediatric patients. The secondary aim was the incidence of associated complications and the procedural time. The physician could freely choose the cannulation method and venous approach. Data were collected for 10 months. Overall, 179 patients were assessed for eligibility and 107 patients were included. In almost half of the patients (48.6%), the percutaneous puncture was performed by real-time ultrasound navigation. In 51.4% of the patients, the puncture was performed by the landmark method. The overall success rate was 100% (n = 52) in the real-time ultrasound navigation group, 96.4% (n = 53) in the landmark insertion group, (p = 0.496). The first percutaneous puncture success rate was 57.7% (n = 30) in the real-time ultrasound navigation group and 45.5% (n = 25) in the landmark insertion group, (p = 0.460). The data show a higher overall success rate and the first success rate in the US-guided CVC insertion group, but the difference was not statistically significant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9688764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96887642022-11-25 Central Venous Catheter Cannulation in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Prospective Observational Trial Vafek, Václav Skříšovská, Tamara Kosinová, Martina Klabusayová, Eva Musilová, Tereza Kramplová, Tereza Djakow, Jana Klučka, Jozef Kalina, Jiří Štourač, Petr Children (Basel) Article Currently, ultrasound-guided central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is recommended in pediatric patients. However, the clinical practice may vary. The primary aim of this study was the overall success rate and the first attempt success rate in ultrasound-guided CVC insertion versus anatomic-based CVC insertion in pediatric patients. The secondary aim was the incidence of associated complications and the procedural time. The physician could freely choose the cannulation method and venous approach. Data were collected for 10 months. Overall, 179 patients were assessed for eligibility and 107 patients were included. In almost half of the patients (48.6%), the percutaneous puncture was performed by real-time ultrasound navigation. In 51.4% of the patients, the puncture was performed by the landmark method. The overall success rate was 100% (n = 52) in the real-time ultrasound navigation group, 96.4% (n = 53) in the landmark insertion group, (p = 0.496). The first percutaneous puncture success rate was 57.7% (n = 30) in the real-time ultrasound navigation group and 45.5% (n = 25) in the landmark insertion group, (p = 0.460). The data show a higher overall success rate and the first success rate in the US-guided CVC insertion group, but the difference was not statistically significant. MDPI 2022-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9688764/ /pubmed/36360339 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9111611 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vafek, Václav
Skříšovská, Tamara
Kosinová, Martina
Klabusayová, Eva
Musilová, Tereza
Kramplová, Tereza
Djakow, Jana
Klučka, Jozef
Kalina, Jiří
Štourač, Petr
Central Venous Catheter Cannulation in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Prospective Observational Trial
title Central Venous Catheter Cannulation in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Prospective Observational Trial
title_full Central Venous Catheter Cannulation in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Prospective Observational Trial
title_fullStr Central Venous Catheter Cannulation in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Prospective Observational Trial
title_full_unstemmed Central Venous Catheter Cannulation in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Prospective Observational Trial
title_short Central Venous Catheter Cannulation in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Prospective Observational Trial
title_sort central venous catheter cannulation in pediatric anesthesia and intensive care: a prospective observational trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9688764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36360339
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9111611
work_keys_str_mv AT vafekvaclav centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial
AT skrisovskatamara centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial
AT kosinovamartina centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial
AT klabusayovaeva centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial
AT musilovatereza centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial
AT kramplovatereza centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial
AT djakowjana centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial
AT kluckajozef centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial
AT kalinajiri centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial
AT stouracpetr centralvenouscathetercannulationinpediatricanesthesiaandintensivecareaprospectiveobservationaltrial