Cargando…

Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio and Clinical Outcomes in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte ratio (LMR) has shown an association with survival outcomes in several oncological diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the association between LMR and clinical outcomes for cholangiocarcinoma patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess the assoc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dotto-Vasquez, Giuseppe, Villacorta-Ampuero, Andrea K., Ulloque-Badaracco, Juan R., Hernandez-Bustamante, Enrique A., Alarcón-Braga, Esteban A., Herrera-Añazco, Percy, Benites-Zapata, Vicente A., Hernandez, Adrian V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359498
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112655
_version_ 1784836499293863936
author Dotto-Vasquez, Giuseppe
Villacorta-Ampuero, Andrea K.
Ulloque-Badaracco, Juan R.
Hernandez-Bustamante, Enrique A.
Alarcón-Braga, Esteban A.
Herrera-Añazco, Percy
Benites-Zapata, Vicente A.
Hernandez, Adrian V.
author_facet Dotto-Vasquez, Giuseppe
Villacorta-Ampuero, Andrea K.
Ulloque-Badaracco, Juan R.
Hernandez-Bustamante, Enrique A.
Alarcón-Braga, Esteban A.
Herrera-Añazco, Percy
Benites-Zapata, Vicente A.
Hernandez, Adrian V.
author_sort Dotto-Vasquez, Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte ratio (LMR) has shown an association with survival outcomes in several oncological diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the association between LMR and clinical outcomes for cholangiocarcinoma patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess the association between LMR values and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and time to recurrence (TTR) in cholangiocarcinoma patients. We used Hazard ratio (HR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) as a measure of effect for the random effect model meta-analysis. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. The Egger test and funnel plot were developed for approaching publication bias. A total of 19 studies were included in this study (n = 3860). The meta-analysis showed that cholangiocarcinoma patients with low values of LMR were associated with worse OS (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71–0.96; I(2) = 86%) and worse TTR (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.58–0.86; I(2) = 0%). DFS and RFS also were evaluated; however, they did not show statistically significant associations. Low LMR values were associated with a worse OS and TTR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9689307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96893072022-11-25 Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio and Clinical Outcomes in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Dotto-Vasquez, Giuseppe Villacorta-Ampuero, Andrea K. Ulloque-Badaracco, Juan R. Hernandez-Bustamante, Enrique A. Alarcón-Braga, Esteban A. Herrera-Añazco, Percy Benites-Zapata, Vicente A. Hernandez, Adrian V. Diagnostics (Basel) Systematic Review Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte ratio (LMR) has shown an association with survival outcomes in several oncological diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the association between LMR and clinical outcomes for cholangiocarcinoma patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess the association between LMR values and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and time to recurrence (TTR) in cholangiocarcinoma patients. We used Hazard ratio (HR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) as a measure of effect for the random effect model meta-analysis. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. The Egger test and funnel plot were developed for approaching publication bias. A total of 19 studies were included in this study (n = 3860). The meta-analysis showed that cholangiocarcinoma patients with low values of LMR were associated with worse OS (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71–0.96; I(2) = 86%) and worse TTR (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.58–0.86; I(2) = 0%). DFS and RFS also were evaluated; however, they did not show statistically significant associations. Low LMR values were associated with a worse OS and TTR. MDPI 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9689307/ /pubmed/36359498 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112655 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Dotto-Vasquez, Giuseppe
Villacorta-Ampuero, Andrea K.
Ulloque-Badaracco, Juan R.
Hernandez-Bustamante, Enrique A.
Alarcón-Braga, Esteban A.
Herrera-Añazco, Percy
Benites-Zapata, Vicente A.
Hernandez, Adrian V.
Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio and Clinical Outcomes in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio and Clinical Outcomes in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio and Clinical Outcomes in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio and Clinical Outcomes in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio and Clinical Outcomes in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio and Clinical Outcomes in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and clinical outcomes in cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359498
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112655
work_keys_str_mv AT dottovasquezgiuseppe lymphocytetomonocyteratioandclinicaloutcomesincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT villacortaampueroandreak lymphocytetomonocyteratioandclinicaloutcomesincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ulloquebadaraccojuanr lymphocytetomonocyteratioandclinicaloutcomesincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hernandezbustamanteenriquea lymphocytetomonocyteratioandclinicaloutcomesincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alarconbragaestebana lymphocytetomonocyteratioandclinicaloutcomesincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT herreraanazcopercy lymphocytetomonocyteratioandclinicaloutcomesincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT beniteszapatavicentea lymphocytetomonocyteratioandclinicaloutcomesincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hernandezadrianv lymphocytetomonocyteratioandclinicaloutcomesincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis