Cargando…

A Comparison of Neural Networks and Center of Gravity in Muon Hit Position Estimation

The performance of cosmic-ray tomography systems is largely determined by their tracking accuracy. With conventional scintillation detector technology, good precision can be achieved with a small pitch between the elements of the detector array. Improving the resolution implies increasing the number...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aktas, Kadir, Kiisk, Madis, Giammanco, Andrea, Anbarjafari, Gholamreza, Mägi, Märt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36421514
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24111659
_version_ 1784836524478562304
author Aktas, Kadir
Kiisk, Madis
Giammanco, Andrea
Anbarjafari, Gholamreza
Mägi, Märt
author_facet Aktas, Kadir
Kiisk, Madis
Giammanco, Andrea
Anbarjafari, Gholamreza
Mägi, Märt
author_sort Aktas, Kadir
collection PubMed
description The performance of cosmic-ray tomography systems is largely determined by their tracking accuracy. With conventional scintillation detector technology, good precision can be achieved with a small pitch between the elements of the detector array. Improving the resolution implies increasing the number of read-out channels, which in turn increases the complexity and cost of the tracking detectors. As an alternative to that, a scintillation plate detector coupled with multiple silicon photomultipliers could be used as a technically simple solution. In this paper, we present a comparison between two deep-learning-based methods and a conventional Center of Gravity (CoG) algorithm, used to calculate cosmic-ray muon hit positions on the plate detector using the signals from the photomultipliers. In this study, we generated a dataset of muon hits on a detector plate using the Monte Carlo simulation toolkit GEANT4. We demonstrate that two deep-learning-based methods outperform the conventional CoG algorithm by a significant margin. Our proposed algorithm, Fully Connected Network, produces a 0.72 mm average error measured in Euclidean distance between the actual and predicted hit coordinates, showing great improvement in comparison with CoG, which yields 1.41 mm on the same dataset. Additionally, we investigated the effects of different sensor configurations on performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9689399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96893992022-11-25 A Comparison of Neural Networks and Center of Gravity in Muon Hit Position Estimation Aktas, Kadir Kiisk, Madis Giammanco, Andrea Anbarjafari, Gholamreza Mägi, Märt Entropy (Basel) Article The performance of cosmic-ray tomography systems is largely determined by their tracking accuracy. With conventional scintillation detector technology, good precision can be achieved with a small pitch between the elements of the detector array. Improving the resolution implies increasing the number of read-out channels, which in turn increases the complexity and cost of the tracking detectors. As an alternative to that, a scintillation plate detector coupled with multiple silicon photomultipliers could be used as a technically simple solution. In this paper, we present a comparison between two deep-learning-based methods and a conventional Center of Gravity (CoG) algorithm, used to calculate cosmic-ray muon hit positions on the plate detector using the signals from the photomultipliers. In this study, we generated a dataset of muon hits on a detector plate using the Monte Carlo simulation toolkit GEANT4. We demonstrate that two deep-learning-based methods outperform the conventional CoG algorithm by a significant margin. Our proposed algorithm, Fully Connected Network, produces a 0.72 mm average error measured in Euclidean distance between the actual and predicted hit coordinates, showing great improvement in comparison with CoG, which yields 1.41 mm on the same dataset. Additionally, we investigated the effects of different sensor configurations on performance. MDPI 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9689399/ /pubmed/36421514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24111659 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Aktas, Kadir
Kiisk, Madis
Giammanco, Andrea
Anbarjafari, Gholamreza
Mägi, Märt
A Comparison of Neural Networks and Center of Gravity in Muon Hit Position Estimation
title A Comparison of Neural Networks and Center of Gravity in Muon Hit Position Estimation
title_full A Comparison of Neural Networks and Center of Gravity in Muon Hit Position Estimation
title_fullStr A Comparison of Neural Networks and Center of Gravity in Muon Hit Position Estimation
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Neural Networks and Center of Gravity in Muon Hit Position Estimation
title_short A Comparison of Neural Networks and Center of Gravity in Muon Hit Position Estimation
title_sort comparison of neural networks and center of gravity in muon hit position estimation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36421514
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24111659
work_keys_str_mv AT aktaskadir acomparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation
AT kiiskmadis acomparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation
AT giammancoandrea acomparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation
AT anbarjafarigholamreza acomparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation
AT magimart acomparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation
AT aktaskadir comparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation
AT kiiskmadis comparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation
AT giammancoandrea comparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation
AT anbarjafarigholamreza comparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation
AT magimart comparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation