Cargando…
A Comparison of Neural Networks and Center of Gravity in Muon Hit Position Estimation
The performance of cosmic-ray tomography systems is largely determined by their tracking accuracy. With conventional scintillation detector technology, good precision can be achieved with a small pitch between the elements of the detector array. Improving the resolution implies increasing the number...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36421514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24111659 |
_version_ | 1784836524478562304 |
---|---|
author | Aktas, Kadir Kiisk, Madis Giammanco, Andrea Anbarjafari, Gholamreza Mägi, Märt |
author_facet | Aktas, Kadir Kiisk, Madis Giammanco, Andrea Anbarjafari, Gholamreza Mägi, Märt |
author_sort | Aktas, Kadir |
collection | PubMed |
description | The performance of cosmic-ray tomography systems is largely determined by their tracking accuracy. With conventional scintillation detector technology, good precision can be achieved with a small pitch between the elements of the detector array. Improving the resolution implies increasing the number of read-out channels, which in turn increases the complexity and cost of the tracking detectors. As an alternative to that, a scintillation plate detector coupled with multiple silicon photomultipliers could be used as a technically simple solution. In this paper, we present a comparison between two deep-learning-based methods and a conventional Center of Gravity (CoG) algorithm, used to calculate cosmic-ray muon hit positions on the plate detector using the signals from the photomultipliers. In this study, we generated a dataset of muon hits on a detector plate using the Monte Carlo simulation toolkit GEANT4. We demonstrate that two deep-learning-based methods outperform the conventional CoG algorithm by a significant margin. Our proposed algorithm, Fully Connected Network, produces a 0.72 mm average error measured in Euclidean distance between the actual and predicted hit coordinates, showing great improvement in comparison with CoG, which yields 1.41 mm on the same dataset. Additionally, we investigated the effects of different sensor configurations on performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9689399 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96893992022-11-25 A Comparison of Neural Networks and Center of Gravity in Muon Hit Position Estimation Aktas, Kadir Kiisk, Madis Giammanco, Andrea Anbarjafari, Gholamreza Mägi, Märt Entropy (Basel) Article The performance of cosmic-ray tomography systems is largely determined by their tracking accuracy. With conventional scintillation detector technology, good precision can be achieved with a small pitch between the elements of the detector array. Improving the resolution implies increasing the number of read-out channels, which in turn increases the complexity and cost of the tracking detectors. As an alternative to that, a scintillation plate detector coupled with multiple silicon photomultipliers could be used as a technically simple solution. In this paper, we present a comparison between two deep-learning-based methods and a conventional Center of Gravity (CoG) algorithm, used to calculate cosmic-ray muon hit positions on the plate detector using the signals from the photomultipliers. In this study, we generated a dataset of muon hits on a detector plate using the Monte Carlo simulation toolkit GEANT4. We demonstrate that two deep-learning-based methods outperform the conventional CoG algorithm by a significant margin. Our proposed algorithm, Fully Connected Network, produces a 0.72 mm average error measured in Euclidean distance between the actual and predicted hit coordinates, showing great improvement in comparison with CoG, which yields 1.41 mm on the same dataset. Additionally, we investigated the effects of different sensor configurations on performance. MDPI 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9689399/ /pubmed/36421514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24111659 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Aktas, Kadir Kiisk, Madis Giammanco, Andrea Anbarjafari, Gholamreza Mägi, Märt A Comparison of Neural Networks and Center of Gravity in Muon Hit Position Estimation |
title | A Comparison of Neural Networks and Center of Gravity in Muon Hit Position Estimation |
title_full | A Comparison of Neural Networks and Center of Gravity in Muon Hit Position Estimation |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Neural Networks and Center of Gravity in Muon Hit Position Estimation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Neural Networks and Center of Gravity in Muon Hit Position Estimation |
title_short | A Comparison of Neural Networks and Center of Gravity in Muon Hit Position Estimation |
title_sort | comparison of neural networks and center of gravity in muon hit position estimation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36421514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24111659 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aktaskadir acomparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation AT kiiskmadis acomparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation AT giammancoandrea acomparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation AT anbarjafarigholamreza acomparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation AT magimart acomparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation AT aktaskadir comparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation AT kiiskmadis comparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation AT giammancoandrea comparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation AT anbarjafarigholamreza comparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation AT magimart comparisonofneuralnetworksandcenterofgravityinmuonhitpositionestimation |