Cargando…

Evaluation of (68)Ga-Radiolabeled Peptides for HER2 PET Imaging

One in eight women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime and approximately 25% of those cases will be HER2-positive. Current methods for diagnosing HER2-positive breast cancer involve using IHC and FISH from suspected cancer biopsies to quantify HER2 expression. HER2 PET imaging cou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ducharme, Maxwell, Houson, Hailey A., Fernandez, Solana R., Lapi, Suzanne E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359554
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112710
_version_ 1784836576735395840
author Ducharme, Maxwell
Houson, Hailey A.
Fernandez, Solana R.
Lapi, Suzanne E.
author_facet Ducharme, Maxwell
Houson, Hailey A.
Fernandez, Solana R.
Lapi, Suzanne E.
author_sort Ducharme, Maxwell
collection PubMed
description One in eight women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime and approximately 25% of those cases will be HER2-positive. Current methods for diagnosing HER2-positive breast cancer involve using IHC and FISH from suspected cancer biopsies to quantify HER2 expression. HER2 PET imaging could potentially increase accuracy and improve the diagnosis of lesions that are not available for biopsies. Using two previously discovered HER2-targeting peptides, we modified each peptide with the chelator DOTA and a PEG(2) linker resulting in DOTA-PEG(2)-GSGKCCYSL (P5) and DOTA-PEG(2)-DTFPYLGWWNPNEYRY (P6). Each peptide was labeled with (68)Ga and was evaluated for HER2 binding using in vitro cell studies and in vivo tumor xenograft models. Both [(68)Ga]P5 and [(68)Ga]P6 showed significant binding to HER2-positive BT474 cells versus HER2-negative MDA-MB-231 cells ([(68)Ga]P5; 0.68 ± 0.20 versus 0.47 ± 0.05 p < 0.05 and [(68)Ga]P6; 0.55 ± 0.21 versus 0.34 ± 0.12 p < 0.01). [(68)Ga]P5 showed a higher percent injected dose per gram (%ID/g) binding to HER2-positive tumors two hours post-injection compared to HER2-negative tumors (0.24 ± 0.04 versus 0.12 ± 0.06; p < 0.05), while the [(68)Ga]P6 peptide showed significant binding (0.98 ± 0.22 versus 0.51 ± 0.08; p < 0.05) one hour post-injection. These results lay the groundwork for the use of peptides to image HER2-positive breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9689602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96896022022-11-25 Evaluation of (68)Ga-Radiolabeled Peptides for HER2 PET Imaging Ducharme, Maxwell Houson, Hailey A. Fernandez, Solana R. Lapi, Suzanne E. Diagnostics (Basel) Article One in eight women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime and approximately 25% of those cases will be HER2-positive. Current methods for diagnosing HER2-positive breast cancer involve using IHC and FISH from suspected cancer biopsies to quantify HER2 expression. HER2 PET imaging could potentially increase accuracy and improve the diagnosis of lesions that are not available for biopsies. Using two previously discovered HER2-targeting peptides, we modified each peptide with the chelator DOTA and a PEG(2) linker resulting in DOTA-PEG(2)-GSGKCCYSL (P5) and DOTA-PEG(2)-DTFPYLGWWNPNEYRY (P6). Each peptide was labeled with (68)Ga and was evaluated for HER2 binding using in vitro cell studies and in vivo tumor xenograft models. Both [(68)Ga]P5 and [(68)Ga]P6 showed significant binding to HER2-positive BT474 cells versus HER2-negative MDA-MB-231 cells ([(68)Ga]P5; 0.68 ± 0.20 versus 0.47 ± 0.05 p < 0.05 and [(68)Ga]P6; 0.55 ± 0.21 versus 0.34 ± 0.12 p < 0.01). [(68)Ga]P5 showed a higher percent injected dose per gram (%ID/g) binding to HER2-positive tumors two hours post-injection compared to HER2-negative tumors (0.24 ± 0.04 versus 0.12 ± 0.06; p < 0.05), while the [(68)Ga]P6 peptide showed significant binding (0.98 ± 0.22 versus 0.51 ± 0.08; p < 0.05) one hour post-injection. These results lay the groundwork for the use of peptides to image HER2-positive breast cancer. MDPI 2022-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9689602/ /pubmed/36359554 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112710 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ducharme, Maxwell
Houson, Hailey A.
Fernandez, Solana R.
Lapi, Suzanne E.
Evaluation of (68)Ga-Radiolabeled Peptides for HER2 PET Imaging
title Evaluation of (68)Ga-Radiolabeled Peptides for HER2 PET Imaging
title_full Evaluation of (68)Ga-Radiolabeled Peptides for HER2 PET Imaging
title_fullStr Evaluation of (68)Ga-Radiolabeled Peptides for HER2 PET Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of (68)Ga-Radiolabeled Peptides for HER2 PET Imaging
title_short Evaluation of (68)Ga-Radiolabeled Peptides for HER2 PET Imaging
title_sort evaluation of (68)ga-radiolabeled peptides for her2 pet imaging
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359554
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112710
work_keys_str_mv AT ducharmemaxwell evaluationof68garadiolabeledpeptidesforher2petimaging
AT housonhaileya evaluationof68garadiolabeledpeptidesforher2petimaging
AT fernandezsolanar evaluationof68garadiolabeledpeptidesforher2petimaging
AT lapisuzannee evaluationof68garadiolabeledpeptidesforher2petimaging