Cargando…

Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorder: Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Objective: PAS is one of the most dangerous conditions associated with pregnancy and remains undiagnosed before delivery in from half to two-thirds of cases. Correct prenatal diagnosis is essential to reduce the burden of maternal and fetal morbidity. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the accu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faralli, Ida, Del Negro, Valentina, Chinè, Alessandra, Aleksa, Natalia, Ciminello, Enrico, Piccioni, Maria Grazia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36428829
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112769
_version_ 1784836583750369280
author Faralli, Ida
Del Negro, Valentina
Chinè, Alessandra
Aleksa, Natalia
Ciminello, Enrico
Piccioni, Maria Grazia
author_facet Faralli, Ida
Del Negro, Valentina
Chinè, Alessandra
Aleksa, Natalia
Ciminello, Enrico
Piccioni, Maria Grazia
author_sort Faralli, Ida
collection PubMed
description Objective: PAS is one of the most dangerous conditions associated with pregnancy and remains undiagnosed before delivery in from half to two-thirds of cases. Correct prenatal diagnosis is essential to reduce the burden of maternal and fetal morbidity. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the accuracy of US and MRI in the diagnosis of PAS. Study design: In this retrospective study, 104 patients with suspected placenta accreta were enrolled and had been investigated with US and MRI. They were divided into four groups: no PAS, accreta, increta, and percreta. Results: Compared to MRI, US results were higher in the diagnosis and in the identification of PAS severity (85% US vs. 80% MRI). For both methods, in the case of posterior placenta, there is greater difficulty in identifying the presence/absence of the disease (67% in both methods) and the severity level (61% US vs. 55% MRI). Conclusion: US, properly implemented with the application of defined and standardized scores, can be superior to MRI and absolutely sufficient for the diagnosis of PAS, limiting the use of MRI to a few doubtful cases and to cases in which surgical planning is necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9689630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96896302022-11-25 Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorder: Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Faralli, Ida Del Negro, Valentina Chinè, Alessandra Aleksa, Natalia Ciminello, Enrico Piccioni, Maria Grazia Diagnostics (Basel) Article Objective: PAS is one of the most dangerous conditions associated with pregnancy and remains undiagnosed before delivery in from half to two-thirds of cases. Correct prenatal diagnosis is essential to reduce the burden of maternal and fetal morbidity. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the accuracy of US and MRI in the diagnosis of PAS. Study design: In this retrospective study, 104 patients with suspected placenta accreta were enrolled and had been investigated with US and MRI. They were divided into four groups: no PAS, accreta, increta, and percreta. Results: Compared to MRI, US results were higher in the diagnosis and in the identification of PAS severity (85% US vs. 80% MRI). For both methods, in the case of posterior placenta, there is greater difficulty in identifying the presence/absence of the disease (67% in both methods) and the severity level (61% US vs. 55% MRI). Conclusion: US, properly implemented with the application of defined and standardized scores, can be superior to MRI and absolutely sufficient for the diagnosis of PAS, limiting the use of MRI to a few doubtful cases and to cases in which surgical planning is necessary. MDPI 2022-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9689630/ /pubmed/36428829 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112769 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Faralli, Ida
Del Negro, Valentina
Chinè, Alessandra
Aleksa, Natalia
Ciminello, Enrico
Piccioni, Maria Grazia
Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorder: Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorder: Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorder: Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorder: Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorder: Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorder: Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort placenta accreta spectrum (pas) disorder: ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36428829
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112769
work_keys_str_mv AT faralliida placentaaccretaspectrumpasdisorderultrasoundversusmagneticresonanceimaging
AT delnegrovalentina placentaaccretaspectrumpasdisorderultrasoundversusmagneticresonanceimaging
AT chinealessandra placentaaccretaspectrumpasdisorderultrasoundversusmagneticresonanceimaging
AT aleksanatalia placentaaccretaspectrumpasdisorderultrasoundversusmagneticresonanceimaging
AT ciminelloenrico placentaaccretaspectrumpasdisorderultrasoundversusmagneticresonanceimaging
AT piccionimariagrazia placentaaccretaspectrumpasdisorderultrasoundversusmagneticresonanceimaging