Cargando…
Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorder: Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Objective: PAS is one of the most dangerous conditions associated with pregnancy and remains undiagnosed before delivery in from half to two-thirds of cases. Correct prenatal diagnosis is essential to reduce the burden of maternal and fetal morbidity. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the accu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36428829 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112769 |
_version_ | 1784836583750369280 |
---|---|
author | Faralli, Ida Del Negro, Valentina Chinè, Alessandra Aleksa, Natalia Ciminello, Enrico Piccioni, Maria Grazia |
author_facet | Faralli, Ida Del Negro, Valentina Chinè, Alessandra Aleksa, Natalia Ciminello, Enrico Piccioni, Maria Grazia |
author_sort | Faralli, Ida |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: PAS is one of the most dangerous conditions associated with pregnancy and remains undiagnosed before delivery in from half to two-thirds of cases. Correct prenatal diagnosis is essential to reduce the burden of maternal and fetal morbidity. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the accuracy of US and MRI in the diagnosis of PAS. Study design: In this retrospective study, 104 patients with suspected placenta accreta were enrolled and had been investigated with US and MRI. They were divided into four groups: no PAS, accreta, increta, and percreta. Results: Compared to MRI, US results were higher in the diagnosis and in the identification of PAS severity (85% US vs. 80% MRI). For both methods, in the case of posterior placenta, there is greater difficulty in identifying the presence/absence of the disease (67% in both methods) and the severity level (61% US vs. 55% MRI). Conclusion: US, properly implemented with the application of defined and standardized scores, can be superior to MRI and absolutely sufficient for the diagnosis of PAS, limiting the use of MRI to a few doubtful cases and to cases in which surgical planning is necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9689630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96896302022-11-25 Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorder: Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Faralli, Ida Del Negro, Valentina Chinè, Alessandra Aleksa, Natalia Ciminello, Enrico Piccioni, Maria Grazia Diagnostics (Basel) Article Objective: PAS is one of the most dangerous conditions associated with pregnancy and remains undiagnosed before delivery in from half to two-thirds of cases. Correct prenatal diagnosis is essential to reduce the burden of maternal and fetal morbidity. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the accuracy of US and MRI in the diagnosis of PAS. Study design: In this retrospective study, 104 patients with suspected placenta accreta were enrolled and had been investigated with US and MRI. They were divided into four groups: no PAS, accreta, increta, and percreta. Results: Compared to MRI, US results were higher in the diagnosis and in the identification of PAS severity (85% US vs. 80% MRI). For both methods, in the case of posterior placenta, there is greater difficulty in identifying the presence/absence of the disease (67% in both methods) and the severity level (61% US vs. 55% MRI). Conclusion: US, properly implemented with the application of defined and standardized scores, can be superior to MRI and absolutely sufficient for the diagnosis of PAS, limiting the use of MRI to a few doubtful cases and to cases in which surgical planning is necessary. MDPI 2022-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9689630/ /pubmed/36428829 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112769 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Faralli, Ida Del Negro, Valentina Chinè, Alessandra Aleksa, Natalia Ciminello, Enrico Piccioni, Maria Grazia Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorder: Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title | Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorder: Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_full | Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorder: Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_fullStr | Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorder: Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorder: Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_short | Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorder: Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_sort | placenta accreta spectrum (pas) disorder: ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36428829 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112769 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT faralliida placentaaccretaspectrumpasdisorderultrasoundversusmagneticresonanceimaging AT delnegrovalentina placentaaccretaspectrumpasdisorderultrasoundversusmagneticresonanceimaging AT chinealessandra placentaaccretaspectrumpasdisorderultrasoundversusmagneticresonanceimaging AT aleksanatalia placentaaccretaspectrumpasdisorderultrasoundversusmagneticresonanceimaging AT ciminelloenrico placentaaccretaspectrumpasdisorderultrasoundversusmagneticresonanceimaging AT piccionimariagrazia placentaaccretaspectrumpasdisorderultrasoundversusmagneticresonanceimaging |