Cargando…

Comparative Study of DNA Extraction Methods for the PCR Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Human Stool Samples

Stool samples typically contain PCR inhibitors; however, helminths are difficult to lyse and can cause false-negative PCR results. We assessed the effective methods for extracting DNA from different kinds of intestinal parasites. We compared the most common DNA extraction methods from stool samples,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Srirungruang, Siriporn, Mahajindawong, Buraya, Nimitpanya, Panachai, Bunkasem, Uthaitip, Ayuyoe, Pattama, Nuchprayoon, Surang, Sanprasert, Vivornpun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359432
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112588
_version_ 1784836603912388608
author Srirungruang, Siriporn
Mahajindawong, Buraya
Nimitpanya, Panachai
Bunkasem, Uthaitip
Ayuyoe, Pattama
Nuchprayoon, Surang
Sanprasert, Vivornpun
author_facet Srirungruang, Siriporn
Mahajindawong, Buraya
Nimitpanya, Panachai
Bunkasem, Uthaitip
Ayuyoe, Pattama
Nuchprayoon, Surang
Sanprasert, Vivornpun
author_sort Srirungruang, Siriporn
collection PubMed
description Stool samples typically contain PCR inhibitors; however, helminths are difficult to lyse and can cause false-negative PCR results. We assessed the effective methods for extracting DNA from different kinds of intestinal parasites. We compared the most common DNA extraction methods from stool samples, including the phenol-chloroform technique with or without a bead-beating step (P and PB), a QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Q), and a QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit (QB). Genomic DNA was extracted from 85 stool samples collected from patients infected with Blastocystis sp., Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, hookworm, and Strongyloides stercoralis. DNA quantity and DNA quality were evaluated via spectrophotometry, and DNA integrity was assessed by PCR. We found that P and PB provided higher DNA yields (~4 times) than when using Q and QB. However, P showed the lowest detection rate of PCR (8.2%), wherein only S. stercoralis (7 out of 20 samples) was detected. QB showed the highest detection rate of PCR (61.2%). After plasmid spikes, only 5 samples by QB were negative while 60 samples by P were still negative. Remarkably, QB could extract DNA from all the groups of parasites that we tested. These results indicate that QB is the most effective DNA extraction method for the diagnosis and monitoring of intestinal parasites via PCR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9689707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96897072022-11-25 Comparative Study of DNA Extraction Methods for the PCR Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Human Stool Samples Srirungruang, Siriporn Mahajindawong, Buraya Nimitpanya, Panachai Bunkasem, Uthaitip Ayuyoe, Pattama Nuchprayoon, Surang Sanprasert, Vivornpun Diagnostics (Basel) Article Stool samples typically contain PCR inhibitors; however, helminths are difficult to lyse and can cause false-negative PCR results. We assessed the effective methods for extracting DNA from different kinds of intestinal parasites. We compared the most common DNA extraction methods from stool samples, including the phenol-chloroform technique with or without a bead-beating step (P and PB), a QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Q), and a QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit (QB). Genomic DNA was extracted from 85 stool samples collected from patients infected with Blastocystis sp., Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, hookworm, and Strongyloides stercoralis. DNA quantity and DNA quality were evaluated via spectrophotometry, and DNA integrity was assessed by PCR. We found that P and PB provided higher DNA yields (~4 times) than when using Q and QB. However, P showed the lowest detection rate of PCR (8.2%), wherein only S. stercoralis (7 out of 20 samples) was detected. QB showed the highest detection rate of PCR (61.2%). After plasmid spikes, only 5 samples by QB were negative while 60 samples by P were still negative. Remarkably, QB could extract DNA from all the groups of parasites that we tested. These results indicate that QB is the most effective DNA extraction method for the diagnosis and monitoring of intestinal parasites via PCR. MDPI 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9689707/ /pubmed/36359432 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112588 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Srirungruang, Siriporn
Mahajindawong, Buraya
Nimitpanya, Panachai
Bunkasem, Uthaitip
Ayuyoe, Pattama
Nuchprayoon, Surang
Sanprasert, Vivornpun
Comparative Study of DNA Extraction Methods for the PCR Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Human Stool Samples
title Comparative Study of DNA Extraction Methods for the PCR Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Human Stool Samples
title_full Comparative Study of DNA Extraction Methods for the PCR Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Human Stool Samples
title_fullStr Comparative Study of DNA Extraction Methods for the PCR Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Human Stool Samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of DNA Extraction Methods for the PCR Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Human Stool Samples
title_short Comparative Study of DNA Extraction Methods for the PCR Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Human Stool Samples
title_sort comparative study of dna extraction methods for the pcr detection of intestinal parasites in human stool samples
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359432
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112588
work_keys_str_mv AT srirungruangsiriporn comparativestudyofdnaextractionmethodsforthepcrdetectionofintestinalparasitesinhumanstoolsamples
AT mahajindawongburaya comparativestudyofdnaextractionmethodsforthepcrdetectionofintestinalparasitesinhumanstoolsamples
AT nimitpanyapanachai comparativestudyofdnaextractionmethodsforthepcrdetectionofintestinalparasitesinhumanstoolsamples
AT bunkasemuthaitip comparativestudyofdnaextractionmethodsforthepcrdetectionofintestinalparasitesinhumanstoolsamples
AT ayuyoepattama comparativestudyofdnaextractionmethodsforthepcrdetectionofintestinalparasitesinhumanstoolsamples
AT nuchprayoonsurang comparativestudyofdnaextractionmethodsforthepcrdetectionofintestinalparasitesinhumanstoolsamples
AT sanprasertvivornpun comparativestudyofdnaextractionmethodsforthepcrdetectionofintestinalparasitesinhumanstoolsamples