Cargando…
Prognostic Comparison between Oncotype DX(®) and a 23-Gene Classifier, RecurIndex(®), on the Taiwan Breast Cancer Population
The applicability of the Oncotype DX(®) (Genomic Health, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA) recurrence score (RS) in Asian populations is unclear. A 23-gene classifier, RecurIndex(®) (Amwise Diagnostics, Pte. Ltd., Singapore), has been developed based on the gene expression profiles of early-stage breast...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36428912 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112850 |
_version_ | 1784836631044292608 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Chuan-Hsun Yang, Po-Sheng Hsieh, Chia-Ming Chen, Ting-Hao Cheng, Skye Hung-Chun Yang, Cheng-En Huang, Chiun-Sheng |
author_facet | Chang, Chuan-Hsun Yang, Po-Sheng Hsieh, Chia-Ming Chen, Ting-Hao Cheng, Skye Hung-Chun Yang, Cheng-En Huang, Chiun-Sheng |
author_sort | Chang, Chuan-Hsun |
collection | PubMed |
description | The applicability of the Oncotype DX(®) (Genomic Health, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA) recurrence score (RS) in Asian populations is unclear. A 23-gene classifier, RecurIndex(®) (Amwise Diagnostics, Pte. Ltd., Singapore), has been developed based on the gene expression profiles of early-stage breast cancer patients of ethnic Han Chinese population in Taiwan. This study aimed to compare the performance of the Oncotype DX(®) RS with the RecurIndex(®) recurrence index (RI) for predicting relapse-free survival. Therefore, we calculated both the RI and RS for 110 early stage breast cancer patients, with the cut-off value for high-risk recurrence set at 26 and 29 for the RS and the RI, respectively. With relapse-free interval (RFI) as the primary endpoint, the concordance between RS and RI was 78.2% (Kappa value = 0.297). For a median follow-up interval of 27 months, there was a statistically significant difference in RFI between the high- and low-risk groups defined by the RI (p = 0.04) but not between risk groups defined by the RS (p = 0.66). In conclusion, whereas there was high concordance between the RecurIndex(®) RI and the Oncotype DX RS, the current data showed that the RI had a better discrimination for recurrence risk than the RS. Subsequent studies with larger sample sizes will be needed to confirm the superiority of the RI over the RS in the Asian population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9689820 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96898202022-11-25 Prognostic Comparison between Oncotype DX(®) and a 23-Gene Classifier, RecurIndex(®), on the Taiwan Breast Cancer Population Chang, Chuan-Hsun Yang, Po-Sheng Hsieh, Chia-Ming Chen, Ting-Hao Cheng, Skye Hung-Chun Yang, Cheng-En Huang, Chiun-Sheng Diagnostics (Basel) Article The applicability of the Oncotype DX(®) (Genomic Health, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA) recurrence score (RS) in Asian populations is unclear. A 23-gene classifier, RecurIndex(®) (Amwise Diagnostics, Pte. Ltd., Singapore), has been developed based on the gene expression profiles of early-stage breast cancer patients of ethnic Han Chinese population in Taiwan. This study aimed to compare the performance of the Oncotype DX(®) RS with the RecurIndex(®) recurrence index (RI) for predicting relapse-free survival. Therefore, we calculated both the RI and RS for 110 early stage breast cancer patients, with the cut-off value for high-risk recurrence set at 26 and 29 for the RS and the RI, respectively. With relapse-free interval (RFI) as the primary endpoint, the concordance between RS and RI was 78.2% (Kappa value = 0.297). For a median follow-up interval of 27 months, there was a statistically significant difference in RFI between the high- and low-risk groups defined by the RI (p = 0.04) but not between risk groups defined by the RS (p = 0.66). In conclusion, whereas there was high concordance between the RecurIndex(®) RI and the Oncotype DX RS, the current data showed that the RI had a better discrimination for recurrence risk than the RS. Subsequent studies with larger sample sizes will be needed to confirm the superiority of the RI over the RS in the Asian population. MDPI 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9689820/ /pubmed/36428912 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112850 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chang, Chuan-Hsun Yang, Po-Sheng Hsieh, Chia-Ming Chen, Ting-Hao Cheng, Skye Hung-Chun Yang, Cheng-En Huang, Chiun-Sheng Prognostic Comparison between Oncotype DX(®) and a 23-Gene Classifier, RecurIndex(®), on the Taiwan Breast Cancer Population |
title | Prognostic Comparison between Oncotype DX(®) and a 23-Gene Classifier, RecurIndex(®), on the Taiwan Breast Cancer Population |
title_full | Prognostic Comparison between Oncotype DX(®) and a 23-Gene Classifier, RecurIndex(®), on the Taiwan Breast Cancer Population |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Comparison between Oncotype DX(®) and a 23-Gene Classifier, RecurIndex(®), on the Taiwan Breast Cancer Population |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Comparison between Oncotype DX(®) and a 23-Gene Classifier, RecurIndex(®), on the Taiwan Breast Cancer Population |
title_short | Prognostic Comparison between Oncotype DX(®) and a 23-Gene Classifier, RecurIndex(®), on the Taiwan Breast Cancer Population |
title_sort | prognostic comparison between oncotype dx(®) and a 23-gene classifier, recurindex(®), on the taiwan breast cancer population |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36428912 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112850 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changchuanhsun prognosticcomparisonbetweenoncotypedxanda23geneclassifierrecurindexonthetaiwanbreastcancerpopulation AT yangposheng prognosticcomparisonbetweenoncotypedxanda23geneclassifierrecurindexonthetaiwanbreastcancerpopulation AT hsiehchiaming prognosticcomparisonbetweenoncotypedxanda23geneclassifierrecurindexonthetaiwanbreastcancerpopulation AT chentinghao prognosticcomparisonbetweenoncotypedxanda23geneclassifierrecurindexonthetaiwanbreastcancerpopulation AT chengskyehungchun prognosticcomparisonbetweenoncotypedxanda23geneclassifierrecurindexonthetaiwanbreastcancerpopulation AT yangchengen prognosticcomparisonbetweenoncotypedxanda23geneclassifierrecurindexonthetaiwanbreastcancerpopulation AT huangchiunsheng prognosticcomparisonbetweenoncotypedxanda23geneclassifierrecurindexonthetaiwanbreastcancerpopulation |