Cargando…

Risk-Based Colposcopy for Cervical Precancer Detection: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study in China

Recently published guidelines depend upon screening for cervical precancer risk stratification; however, colposcopy provides key information. There is no data from developing countries that could be used comparatively. Therefore, we assessed the potential benefits of intercalating colposcopic impres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xue, Peng, Seery, Samuel, Li, Qing, Jiang, Yu, Qiao, Youlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359428
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112585
_version_ 1784836648157052928
author Xue, Peng
Seery, Samuel
Li, Qing
Jiang, Yu
Qiao, Youlin
author_facet Xue, Peng
Seery, Samuel
Li, Qing
Jiang, Yu
Qiao, Youlin
author_sort Xue, Peng
collection PubMed
description Recently published guidelines depend upon screening for cervical precancer risk stratification; however, colposcopy provides key information. There is no data from developing countries that could be used comparatively. Therefore, we assessed the potential benefits of intercalating colposcopic impressions with screening results to detect cervical precancers through a multicenter, cross-sectional study of a Chinese population. Anonymized data from 6012 women with cytologic assessment, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, colposcopic impressions, and histological results were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cytology, HPV16/18+, and/or high-grade colposcopic impressions markedly increased cervical precancer risk, while high-grade colposcopic impressions were associated with the highest risk. The risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) ranged from 0% for normal/benign colposcopic impressions, <HSIL cytologies, and HPV negative to 63.61% for high-grade colposcopy, HSIL+ cytology, and HPV16/18+, across 18 subgroups. High-grade colposcopic impressions were associated with a >19% increased risk of CIN3+, even in participants without HSIL+ cytology and/or HPV16/18+. Regardless of screening outcomes, normal/benign colposcopic impressions were associated with the lowest risk of CIN3+ (<0.5%). Integrating colposcopic impressions into risk assessment may therefore provide key information for identifying cervical precancer cases. Adopting this approach may improve detection rates while also providing reassurance for women with a lower risk of developing cervical cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9689887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96898872022-11-25 Risk-Based Colposcopy for Cervical Precancer Detection: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study in China Xue, Peng Seery, Samuel Li, Qing Jiang, Yu Qiao, Youlin Diagnostics (Basel) Article Recently published guidelines depend upon screening for cervical precancer risk stratification; however, colposcopy provides key information. There is no data from developing countries that could be used comparatively. Therefore, we assessed the potential benefits of intercalating colposcopic impressions with screening results to detect cervical precancers through a multicenter, cross-sectional study of a Chinese population. Anonymized data from 6012 women with cytologic assessment, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, colposcopic impressions, and histological results were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cytology, HPV16/18+, and/or high-grade colposcopic impressions markedly increased cervical precancer risk, while high-grade colposcopic impressions were associated with the highest risk. The risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) ranged from 0% for normal/benign colposcopic impressions, <HSIL cytologies, and HPV negative to 63.61% for high-grade colposcopy, HSIL+ cytology, and HPV16/18+, across 18 subgroups. High-grade colposcopic impressions were associated with a >19% increased risk of CIN3+, even in participants without HSIL+ cytology and/or HPV16/18+. Regardless of screening outcomes, normal/benign colposcopic impressions were associated with the lowest risk of CIN3+ (<0.5%). Integrating colposcopic impressions into risk assessment may therefore provide key information for identifying cervical precancer cases. Adopting this approach may improve detection rates while also providing reassurance for women with a lower risk of developing cervical cancer. MDPI 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9689887/ /pubmed/36359428 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112585 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Xue, Peng
Seery, Samuel
Li, Qing
Jiang, Yu
Qiao, Youlin
Risk-Based Colposcopy for Cervical Precancer Detection: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study in China
title Risk-Based Colposcopy for Cervical Precancer Detection: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study in China
title_full Risk-Based Colposcopy for Cervical Precancer Detection: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study in China
title_fullStr Risk-Based Colposcopy for Cervical Precancer Detection: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study in China
title_full_unstemmed Risk-Based Colposcopy for Cervical Precancer Detection: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study in China
title_short Risk-Based Colposcopy for Cervical Precancer Detection: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study in China
title_sort risk-based colposcopy for cervical precancer detection: a cross-sectional multicenter study in china
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9689887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359428
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112585
work_keys_str_mv AT xuepeng riskbasedcolposcopyforcervicalprecancerdetectionacrosssectionalmulticenterstudyinchina
AT seerysamuel riskbasedcolposcopyforcervicalprecancerdetectionacrosssectionalmulticenterstudyinchina
AT liqing riskbasedcolposcopyforcervicalprecancerdetectionacrosssectionalmulticenterstudyinchina
AT jiangyu riskbasedcolposcopyforcervicalprecancerdetectionacrosssectionalmulticenterstudyinchina
AT qiaoyoulin riskbasedcolposcopyforcervicalprecancerdetectionacrosssectionalmulticenterstudyinchina