Cargando…
Why Good Employees Do Bad Things: The Link between Pro-Environmental Behavior and Workplace Deviance
Despite the significance of pro-environmental behavior (PEB) in the workplace, most of the existing studies have neglected its negative work outcomes. Drawing upon moral licensing theory and cognitive dissonance theory, we construct a conceptual model of the influence mechanism of employees’ PEB (i....
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9690767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36430002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215284 |
_version_ | 1784836874966138880 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Zhenglin Shi, Haiqing Feng, Taiwen |
author_facet | Zhang, Zhenglin Shi, Haiqing Feng, Taiwen |
author_sort | Zhang, Zhenglin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the significance of pro-environmental behavior (PEB) in the workplace, most of the existing studies have neglected its negative work outcomes. Drawing upon moral licensing theory and cognitive dissonance theory, we construct a conceptual model of the influence mechanism of employees’ PEB (i.e., public-sphere PEB, private-sphere PEB) on workplace deviance through psychological entitlement, and the moderating effect of rationalization of workplace deviance on the relationship between psychological entitlement and workplace deviance. Using two-stage survey data from 216 employees in China, we performed hierarchical regression analysis and structural equation modeling method to test our hypotheses. Our findings reveal that public-sphere PEB positively affects psychological entitlement, while private-sphere PEB negatively affects psychological entitlement. Psychological entitlement further positively affects workplace deviance. In addition, rationalization of workplace deviance strengthens the positive impact of psychological entitlement on workplace deviance. This study offers novel insights into the dark side of PEB literature by exploring the PEB–workplace deviance relationship. This study also contributes to managerial implications of how PEB leads to workplace deviance and how to address this issue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9690767 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96907672022-11-25 Why Good Employees Do Bad Things: The Link between Pro-Environmental Behavior and Workplace Deviance Zhang, Zhenglin Shi, Haiqing Feng, Taiwen Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Despite the significance of pro-environmental behavior (PEB) in the workplace, most of the existing studies have neglected its negative work outcomes. Drawing upon moral licensing theory and cognitive dissonance theory, we construct a conceptual model of the influence mechanism of employees’ PEB (i.e., public-sphere PEB, private-sphere PEB) on workplace deviance through psychological entitlement, and the moderating effect of rationalization of workplace deviance on the relationship between psychological entitlement and workplace deviance. Using two-stage survey data from 216 employees in China, we performed hierarchical regression analysis and structural equation modeling method to test our hypotheses. Our findings reveal that public-sphere PEB positively affects psychological entitlement, while private-sphere PEB negatively affects psychological entitlement. Psychological entitlement further positively affects workplace deviance. In addition, rationalization of workplace deviance strengthens the positive impact of psychological entitlement on workplace deviance. This study offers novel insights into the dark side of PEB literature by exploring the PEB–workplace deviance relationship. This study also contributes to managerial implications of how PEB leads to workplace deviance and how to address this issue. MDPI 2022-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9690767/ /pubmed/36430002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215284 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Zhenglin Shi, Haiqing Feng, Taiwen Why Good Employees Do Bad Things: The Link between Pro-Environmental Behavior and Workplace Deviance |
title | Why Good Employees Do Bad Things: The Link between Pro-Environmental Behavior and Workplace Deviance |
title_full | Why Good Employees Do Bad Things: The Link between Pro-Environmental Behavior and Workplace Deviance |
title_fullStr | Why Good Employees Do Bad Things: The Link between Pro-Environmental Behavior and Workplace Deviance |
title_full_unstemmed | Why Good Employees Do Bad Things: The Link between Pro-Environmental Behavior and Workplace Deviance |
title_short | Why Good Employees Do Bad Things: The Link between Pro-Environmental Behavior and Workplace Deviance |
title_sort | why good employees do bad things: the link between pro-environmental behavior and workplace deviance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9690767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36430002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangzhenglin whygoodemployeesdobadthingsthelinkbetweenproenvironmentalbehaviorandworkplacedeviance AT shihaiqing whygoodemployeesdobadthingsthelinkbetweenproenvironmentalbehaviorandworkplacedeviance AT fengtaiwen whygoodemployeesdobadthingsthelinkbetweenproenvironmentalbehaviorandworkplacedeviance |