Cargando…
Study of CTS DNA Proficiency Tests with Regard to DNA Mixture Interpretation: A NIST Scientific Foundation Review
The National Institute of Standards and Technology has released a document entitled DNA Mixture Interpretation: A NIST Scientific Foundation Review for public comment. This has become known as the Draft NIST Foundation Review. It contains the statement: “Across these 69 data sets, there were 80 fals...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9690953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36421845 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13112171 |
_version_ | 1784836923616919552 |
---|---|
author | Bille, Todd Coble, Michael D. Kalafut, Tim Buckleton, John |
author_facet | Bille, Todd Coble, Michael D. Kalafut, Tim Buckleton, John |
author_sort | Bille, Todd |
collection | PubMed |
description | The National Institute of Standards and Technology has released a document entitled DNA Mixture Interpretation: A NIST Scientific Foundation Review for public comment. This has become known as the Draft NIST Foundation Review. It contains the statement: “Across these 69 data sets, there were 80 false negatives and 18 false positives reported from 110,408 possible responses (27,602 participants × two evidence items × two reference items). In the past five years, the number of participants using PGS has grown.” We examine a set of proficiency test results to determine if these NIST statements could be justified. The summary reports for each relevant forensic biology test (Forensic Biology, Semen, and Mixture) in the years 2018–2021 were reviewed. Data were also provided to us by CTS upon our request. None of the false positives or negatives could be attributed to the mixture interpretation strategy and certainly not to the use of PGS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9690953 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96909532022-11-25 Study of CTS DNA Proficiency Tests with Regard to DNA Mixture Interpretation: A NIST Scientific Foundation Review Bille, Todd Coble, Michael D. Kalafut, Tim Buckleton, John Genes (Basel) Brief Report The National Institute of Standards and Technology has released a document entitled DNA Mixture Interpretation: A NIST Scientific Foundation Review for public comment. This has become known as the Draft NIST Foundation Review. It contains the statement: “Across these 69 data sets, there were 80 false negatives and 18 false positives reported from 110,408 possible responses (27,602 participants × two evidence items × two reference items). In the past five years, the number of participants using PGS has grown.” We examine a set of proficiency test results to determine if these NIST statements could be justified. The summary reports for each relevant forensic biology test (Forensic Biology, Semen, and Mixture) in the years 2018–2021 were reviewed. Data were also provided to us by CTS upon our request. None of the false positives or negatives could be attributed to the mixture interpretation strategy and certainly not to the use of PGS. MDPI 2022-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9690953/ /pubmed/36421845 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13112171 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Bille, Todd Coble, Michael D. Kalafut, Tim Buckleton, John Study of CTS DNA Proficiency Tests with Regard to DNA Mixture Interpretation: A NIST Scientific Foundation Review |
title | Study of CTS DNA Proficiency Tests with Regard to DNA Mixture Interpretation: A NIST Scientific Foundation Review |
title_full | Study of CTS DNA Proficiency Tests with Regard to DNA Mixture Interpretation: A NIST Scientific Foundation Review |
title_fullStr | Study of CTS DNA Proficiency Tests with Regard to DNA Mixture Interpretation: A NIST Scientific Foundation Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Study of CTS DNA Proficiency Tests with Regard to DNA Mixture Interpretation: A NIST Scientific Foundation Review |
title_short | Study of CTS DNA Proficiency Tests with Regard to DNA Mixture Interpretation: A NIST Scientific Foundation Review |
title_sort | study of cts dna proficiency tests with regard to dna mixture interpretation: a nist scientific foundation review |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9690953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36421845 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13112171 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT billetodd studyofctsdnaproficiencytestswithregardtodnamixtureinterpretationanistscientificfoundationreview AT coblemichaeld studyofctsdnaproficiencytestswithregardtodnamixtureinterpretationanistscientificfoundationreview AT kalafuttim studyofctsdnaproficiencytestswithregardtodnamixtureinterpretationanistscientificfoundationreview AT buckletonjohn studyofctsdnaproficiencytestswithregardtodnamixtureinterpretationanistscientificfoundationreview |