Cargando…

Formative Usability Evaluation of a Three-Way Digital Healthcare System for the People with Disabilities and Their Caregivers: A Cross-Sectional Study

During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a growing awareness about the importance of building a health and safety net based on digital healthcare systems, such as ICT-based local community online services and patient monitoring technology. This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the forma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Ju Hee, Bae, Young-Hyeon, Kim, Sung Shin, Lee, Minyoung, Ho, Seung Hee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9690967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36421649
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10112325
_version_ 1784836927147474944
author Kim, Ju Hee
Bae, Young-Hyeon
Kim, Sung Shin
Lee, Minyoung
Ho, Seung Hee
author_facet Kim, Ju Hee
Bae, Young-Hyeon
Kim, Sung Shin
Lee, Minyoung
Ho, Seung Hee
author_sort Kim, Ju Hee
collection PubMed
description During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a growing awareness about the importance of building a health and safety net based on digital healthcare systems, such as ICT-based local community online services and patient monitoring technology. This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the formative usability of a three-way digital healthcare system, which had been developed to build a health and safety net for people with disabilities and deriving the directions for system improvement in order for them to be used as basic data for further system enhancement. A formative usability evaluation of a three-way digital healthcare system was performed with the participation of 43 healthcare professionals, using the 10-item System Usability Scale (SUS) and five items for satisfaction evaluation. Each item was rated on a five-point Likert scale, with the result converted to a scale of 100. Analysis was performed using the average score and the acceptable system usability level. The overall mean SUS score was 62.4, which corresponds to Grade D according to the SUS grading scale, and the below-average items were complexity (Q2), convenience (Q8), simplicity (Q3), professionalism (technician support, prior learning) (Q4, Q10), and learnability (Q7). The overall mean user satisfaction was 71.2 points, where overall satisfaction, system architecture and understandability, and continuous use intention were marked with below-average scores. The SUS D grade is interpreted as “fair” and the water solubility is “almost acceptable”. For the usability enhancement of the newly developed a three-way digital healthcare system, the overall direction for system architecture improvement was analyzed centering on complexity (Q2), convenience (Q8), professionalism (technician support, prior learning) (Q4, Q10), learnability (Q7), and simplicity (Q3). Efforts need to be directed at enhancing system satisfaction and continuance rate by deriving detailed system improvement strategies and achieving system enhancement to reflect the opinions of not only experts but also users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9690967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96909672022-11-25 Formative Usability Evaluation of a Three-Way Digital Healthcare System for the People with Disabilities and Their Caregivers: A Cross-Sectional Study Kim, Ju Hee Bae, Young-Hyeon Kim, Sung Shin Lee, Minyoung Ho, Seung Hee Healthcare (Basel) Article During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a growing awareness about the importance of building a health and safety net based on digital healthcare systems, such as ICT-based local community online services and patient monitoring technology. This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the formative usability of a three-way digital healthcare system, which had been developed to build a health and safety net for people with disabilities and deriving the directions for system improvement in order for them to be used as basic data for further system enhancement. A formative usability evaluation of a three-way digital healthcare system was performed with the participation of 43 healthcare professionals, using the 10-item System Usability Scale (SUS) and five items for satisfaction evaluation. Each item was rated on a five-point Likert scale, with the result converted to a scale of 100. Analysis was performed using the average score and the acceptable system usability level. The overall mean SUS score was 62.4, which corresponds to Grade D according to the SUS grading scale, and the below-average items were complexity (Q2), convenience (Q8), simplicity (Q3), professionalism (technician support, prior learning) (Q4, Q10), and learnability (Q7). The overall mean user satisfaction was 71.2 points, where overall satisfaction, system architecture and understandability, and continuous use intention were marked with below-average scores. The SUS D grade is interpreted as “fair” and the water solubility is “almost acceptable”. For the usability enhancement of the newly developed a three-way digital healthcare system, the overall direction for system architecture improvement was analyzed centering on complexity (Q2), convenience (Q8), professionalism (technician support, prior learning) (Q4, Q10), learnability (Q7), and simplicity (Q3). Efforts need to be directed at enhancing system satisfaction and continuance rate by deriving detailed system improvement strategies and achieving system enhancement to reflect the opinions of not only experts but also users. MDPI 2022-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9690967/ /pubmed/36421649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10112325 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Ju Hee
Bae, Young-Hyeon
Kim, Sung Shin
Lee, Minyoung
Ho, Seung Hee
Formative Usability Evaluation of a Three-Way Digital Healthcare System for the People with Disabilities and Their Caregivers: A Cross-Sectional Study
title Formative Usability Evaluation of a Three-Way Digital Healthcare System for the People with Disabilities and Their Caregivers: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Formative Usability Evaluation of a Three-Way Digital Healthcare System for the People with Disabilities and Their Caregivers: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Formative Usability Evaluation of a Three-Way Digital Healthcare System for the People with Disabilities and Their Caregivers: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Formative Usability Evaluation of a Three-Way Digital Healthcare System for the People with Disabilities and Their Caregivers: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Formative Usability Evaluation of a Three-Way Digital Healthcare System for the People with Disabilities and Their Caregivers: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort formative usability evaluation of a three-way digital healthcare system for the people with disabilities and their caregivers: a cross-sectional study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9690967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36421649
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10112325
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjuhee formativeusabilityevaluationofathreewaydigitalhealthcaresystemforthepeoplewithdisabilitiesandtheircaregiversacrosssectionalstudy
AT baeyounghyeon formativeusabilityevaluationofathreewaydigitalhealthcaresystemforthepeoplewithdisabilitiesandtheircaregiversacrosssectionalstudy
AT kimsungshin formativeusabilityevaluationofathreewaydigitalhealthcaresystemforthepeoplewithdisabilitiesandtheircaregiversacrosssectionalstudy
AT leeminyoung formativeusabilityevaluationofathreewaydigitalhealthcaresystemforthepeoplewithdisabilitiesandtheircaregiversacrosssectionalstudy
AT hoseunghee formativeusabilityevaluationofathreewaydigitalhealthcaresystemforthepeoplewithdisabilitiesandtheircaregiversacrosssectionalstudy