Cargando…
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes—A Systematic Review
(1) Background: AI-based solutions could become crucial for the prediction of pregnancy disorders and complications. This study investigated the evidence for applying artificial intelligence methods in obstetric pregnancy risk assessment and adverse pregnancy outcome prediction. (2) Methods: Authors...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9690973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36360505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10112164 |
_version_ | 1784836928657424384 |
---|---|
author | Feduniw, Stepan Golik, Dawid Kajdy, Anna Pruc, Michał Modzelewski, Jan Sys, Dorota Kwiatkowski, Sebastian Makomaska-Szaroszyk, Elżbieta Rabijewski, Michał |
author_facet | Feduniw, Stepan Golik, Dawid Kajdy, Anna Pruc, Michał Modzelewski, Jan Sys, Dorota Kwiatkowski, Sebastian Makomaska-Szaroszyk, Elżbieta Rabijewski, Michał |
author_sort | Feduniw, Stepan |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: AI-based solutions could become crucial for the prediction of pregnancy disorders and complications. This study investigated the evidence for applying artificial intelligence methods in obstetric pregnancy risk assessment and adverse pregnancy outcome prediction. (2) Methods: Authors screened the following databases: Pubmed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. This study included all the evaluative studies comparing artificial intelligence methods in predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes. The PROSPERO ID number is CRD42020178944, and the study protocol was published before this publication. (3) Results: AI application was found in nine groups: general pregnancy risk assessment, prenatal diagnosis, pregnancy hypertension disorders, fetal growth, stillbirth, gestational diabetes, preterm deliveries, delivery route, and others. According to this systematic review, the best artificial intelligence application for assessing medical conditions is ANN methods. The average accuracy of ANN methods was established to be around 80–90%. (4) Conclusions: The application of AI methods as a digital software can help medical practitioners in their everyday practice during pregnancy risk assessment. Based on published studies, models that used ANN methods could be applied in APO prediction. Nevertheless, further studies could identify new methods with an even better prediction potential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9690973 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96909732022-11-25 Application of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes—A Systematic Review Feduniw, Stepan Golik, Dawid Kajdy, Anna Pruc, Michał Modzelewski, Jan Sys, Dorota Kwiatkowski, Sebastian Makomaska-Szaroszyk, Elżbieta Rabijewski, Michał Healthcare (Basel) Systematic Review (1) Background: AI-based solutions could become crucial for the prediction of pregnancy disorders and complications. This study investigated the evidence for applying artificial intelligence methods in obstetric pregnancy risk assessment and adverse pregnancy outcome prediction. (2) Methods: Authors screened the following databases: Pubmed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. This study included all the evaluative studies comparing artificial intelligence methods in predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes. The PROSPERO ID number is CRD42020178944, and the study protocol was published before this publication. (3) Results: AI application was found in nine groups: general pregnancy risk assessment, prenatal diagnosis, pregnancy hypertension disorders, fetal growth, stillbirth, gestational diabetes, preterm deliveries, delivery route, and others. According to this systematic review, the best artificial intelligence application for assessing medical conditions is ANN methods. The average accuracy of ANN methods was established to be around 80–90%. (4) Conclusions: The application of AI methods as a digital software can help medical practitioners in their everyday practice during pregnancy risk assessment. Based on published studies, models that used ANN methods could be applied in APO prediction. Nevertheless, further studies could identify new methods with an even better prediction potential. MDPI 2022-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9690973/ /pubmed/36360505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10112164 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Feduniw, Stepan Golik, Dawid Kajdy, Anna Pruc, Michał Modzelewski, Jan Sys, Dorota Kwiatkowski, Sebastian Makomaska-Szaroszyk, Elżbieta Rabijewski, Michał Application of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes—A Systematic Review |
title | Application of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes—A Systematic Review |
title_full | Application of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes—A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Application of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes—A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Application of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes—A Systematic Review |
title_short | Application of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes—A Systematic Review |
title_sort | application of artificial intelligence in screening for adverse perinatal outcomes—a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9690973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36360505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10112164 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT feduniwstepan applicationofartificialintelligenceinscreeningforadverseperinataloutcomesasystematicreview AT golikdawid applicationofartificialintelligenceinscreeningforadverseperinataloutcomesasystematicreview AT kajdyanna applicationofartificialintelligenceinscreeningforadverseperinataloutcomesasystematicreview AT prucmichał applicationofartificialintelligenceinscreeningforadverseperinataloutcomesasystematicreview AT modzelewskijan applicationofartificialintelligenceinscreeningforadverseperinataloutcomesasystematicreview AT sysdorota applicationofartificialintelligenceinscreeningforadverseperinataloutcomesasystematicreview AT kwiatkowskisebastian applicationofartificialintelligenceinscreeningforadverseperinataloutcomesasystematicreview AT makomaskaszaroszykelzbieta applicationofartificialintelligenceinscreeningforadverseperinataloutcomesasystematicreview AT rabijewskimichał applicationofartificialintelligenceinscreeningforadverseperinataloutcomesasystematicreview |