Cargando…

Application of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes—A Systematic Review

(1) Background: AI-based solutions could become crucial for the prediction of pregnancy disorders and complications. This study investigated the evidence for applying artificial intelligence methods in obstetric pregnancy risk assessment and adverse pregnancy outcome prediction. (2) Methods: Authors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feduniw, Stepan, Golik, Dawid, Kajdy, Anna, Pruc, Michał, Modzelewski, Jan, Sys, Dorota, Kwiatkowski, Sebastian, Makomaska-Szaroszyk, Elżbieta, Rabijewski, Michał
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9690973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36360505
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10112164
_version_ 1784836928657424384
author Feduniw, Stepan
Golik, Dawid
Kajdy, Anna
Pruc, Michał
Modzelewski, Jan
Sys, Dorota
Kwiatkowski, Sebastian
Makomaska-Szaroszyk, Elżbieta
Rabijewski, Michał
author_facet Feduniw, Stepan
Golik, Dawid
Kajdy, Anna
Pruc, Michał
Modzelewski, Jan
Sys, Dorota
Kwiatkowski, Sebastian
Makomaska-Szaroszyk, Elżbieta
Rabijewski, Michał
author_sort Feduniw, Stepan
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: AI-based solutions could become crucial for the prediction of pregnancy disorders and complications. This study investigated the evidence for applying artificial intelligence methods in obstetric pregnancy risk assessment and adverse pregnancy outcome prediction. (2) Methods: Authors screened the following databases: Pubmed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. This study included all the evaluative studies comparing artificial intelligence methods in predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes. The PROSPERO ID number is CRD42020178944, and the study protocol was published before this publication. (3) Results: AI application was found in nine groups: general pregnancy risk assessment, prenatal diagnosis, pregnancy hypertension disorders, fetal growth, stillbirth, gestational diabetes, preterm deliveries, delivery route, and others. According to this systematic review, the best artificial intelligence application for assessing medical conditions is ANN methods. The average accuracy of ANN methods was established to be around 80–90%. (4) Conclusions: The application of AI methods as a digital software can help medical practitioners in their everyday practice during pregnancy risk assessment. Based on published studies, models that used ANN methods could be applied in APO prediction. Nevertheless, further studies could identify new methods with an even better prediction potential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9690973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96909732022-11-25 Application of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes—A Systematic Review Feduniw, Stepan Golik, Dawid Kajdy, Anna Pruc, Michał Modzelewski, Jan Sys, Dorota Kwiatkowski, Sebastian Makomaska-Szaroszyk, Elżbieta Rabijewski, Michał Healthcare (Basel) Systematic Review (1) Background: AI-based solutions could become crucial for the prediction of pregnancy disorders and complications. This study investigated the evidence for applying artificial intelligence methods in obstetric pregnancy risk assessment and adverse pregnancy outcome prediction. (2) Methods: Authors screened the following databases: Pubmed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. This study included all the evaluative studies comparing artificial intelligence methods in predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes. The PROSPERO ID number is CRD42020178944, and the study protocol was published before this publication. (3) Results: AI application was found in nine groups: general pregnancy risk assessment, prenatal diagnosis, pregnancy hypertension disorders, fetal growth, stillbirth, gestational diabetes, preterm deliveries, delivery route, and others. According to this systematic review, the best artificial intelligence application for assessing medical conditions is ANN methods. The average accuracy of ANN methods was established to be around 80–90%. (4) Conclusions: The application of AI methods as a digital software can help medical practitioners in their everyday practice during pregnancy risk assessment. Based on published studies, models that used ANN methods could be applied in APO prediction. Nevertheless, further studies could identify new methods with an even better prediction potential. MDPI 2022-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9690973/ /pubmed/36360505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10112164 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Feduniw, Stepan
Golik, Dawid
Kajdy, Anna
Pruc, Michał
Modzelewski, Jan
Sys, Dorota
Kwiatkowski, Sebastian
Makomaska-Szaroszyk, Elżbieta
Rabijewski, Michał
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes—A Systematic Review
title Application of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes—A Systematic Review
title_full Application of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes—A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Application of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes—A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Application of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes—A Systematic Review
title_short Application of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes—A Systematic Review
title_sort application of artificial intelligence in screening for adverse perinatal outcomes—a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9690973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36360505
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10112164
work_keys_str_mv AT feduniwstepan applicationofartificialintelligenceinscreeningforadverseperinataloutcomesasystematicreview
AT golikdawid applicationofartificialintelligenceinscreeningforadverseperinataloutcomesasystematicreview
AT kajdyanna applicationofartificialintelligenceinscreeningforadverseperinataloutcomesasystematicreview
AT prucmichał applicationofartificialintelligenceinscreeningforadverseperinataloutcomesasystematicreview
AT modzelewskijan applicationofartificialintelligenceinscreeningforadverseperinataloutcomesasystematicreview
AT sysdorota applicationofartificialintelligenceinscreeningforadverseperinataloutcomesasystematicreview
AT kwiatkowskisebastian applicationofartificialintelligenceinscreeningforadverseperinataloutcomesasystematicreview
AT makomaskaszaroszykelzbieta applicationofartificialintelligenceinscreeningforadverseperinataloutcomesasystematicreview
AT rabijewskimichał applicationofartificialintelligenceinscreeningforadverseperinataloutcomesasystematicreview