Cargando…

Budget cap and pay-back model to control spending on medicines: A case study of Bulgaria

Central and Eastern European countries (CEEC) have among the highest rates of increase in healthcare expenditure. External reference pricing, generics and biologics price capping, regressive scale for price setting, health technology assessment (HTA), and positive drug lists for reimbursed medicines...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitkova, Zornitsa, Dimitrova, Maria, Doneva, Miglena, Tachkov, Konstantin, Kamusheva, Maria, Marinov, Lyubomir, Gerasimov, Nikolay, Tcharaktchiev, Dimitar, Petrova, Guenka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9691655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36438231
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1011928
_version_ 1784837072735961088
author Mitkova, Zornitsa
Dimitrova, Maria
Doneva, Miglena
Tachkov, Konstantin
Kamusheva, Maria
Marinov, Lyubomir
Gerasimov, Nikolay
Tcharaktchiev, Dimitar
Petrova, Guenka
author_facet Mitkova, Zornitsa
Dimitrova, Maria
Doneva, Miglena
Tachkov, Konstantin
Kamusheva, Maria
Marinov, Lyubomir
Gerasimov, Nikolay
Tcharaktchiev, Dimitar
Petrova, Guenka
author_sort Mitkova, Zornitsa
collection PubMed
description Central and Eastern European countries (CEEC) have among the highest rates of increase in healthcare expenditure. External reference pricing, generics and biologics price capping, regressive scale for price setting, health technology assessment (HTA), and positive drug lists for reimbursed medicines are among the variety of implemented cost-containment measures aimed at reducing and controlling the rising cost for pharmaceuticals. The aim of our study was to analyze the influence of a recently introduced measure in Bulgaria—budget capping in terms of overall budget expenditure. A secondary goal was to analyze current and extrapolate future trends in the healthcare and pharmaceutical budget based on data from 2016 to 2021. The study is a retrospective, observational and prognostic, macroeconomic analysis of the National Health Insurance Fund's (NHIF) budget before (2016–2018) and after (2019–2021) the introduction of the new budget cap model. Subgroups analysis for each of the three new budget groups of medicines (group A: medicines for outpatient treatment, prescribed after approval by a committee of 3 specialists; group B: all other medicines out of group A; and group C: oncology and life-saving medicines out of group A) was also performed, and the data were extrapolated for the next 3 years. The Kruskal–Wallis test was applied to establish statistically significant differences between the groups. During 2016–2021, healthcare services and pharmaceutical spending increased permanently, observing a growth of 82 and 80%, respectively. The overall healthcare budget increased from European €1.8 billion to 3.3 billion. The subgroup analysis showed a similar trend for all three groups, with similar growth between them. The highest spending was observed in group C, which outpaced the others mainly due to the particular antineoplastic (chemotherapy) medicines included in it. The rising overall healthcare cost in Bulgaria (from European €1.8 billion to 3.3 billion) reveals that implementation of a mechanism for budget predictability and sustainability is needed. The introduced budget cap is a relatively effective measure, but the high level of overspending and pay-back amount (from European €34 billion to 59 billion during 2019–2021) reveals that the market environmental risk factors are not well foreseen and practically implemented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9691655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96916552022-11-26 Budget cap and pay-back model to control spending on medicines: A case study of Bulgaria Mitkova, Zornitsa Dimitrova, Maria Doneva, Miglena Tachkov, Konstantin Kamusheva, Maria Marinov, Lyubomir Gerasimov, Nikolay Tcharaktchiev, Dimitar Petrova, Guenka Front Public Health Public Health Central and Eastern European countries (CEEC) have among the highest rates of increase in healthcare expenditure. External reference pricing, generics and biologics price capping, regressive scale for price setting, health technology assessment (HTA), and positive drug lists for reimbursed medicines are among the variety of implemented cost-containment measures aimed at reducing and controlling the rising cost for pharmaceuticals. The aim of our study was to analyze the influence of a recently introduced measure in Bulgaria—budget capping in terms of overall budget expenditure. A secondary goal was to analyze current and extrapolate future trends in the healthcare and pharmaceutical budget based on data from 2016 to 2021. The study is a retrospective, observational and prognostic, macroeconomic analysis of the National Health Insurance Fund's (NHIF) budget before (2016–2018) and after (2019–2021) the introduction of the new budget cap model. Subgroups analysis for each of the three new budget groups of medicines (group A: medicines for outpatient treatment, prescribed after approval by a committee of 3 specialists; group B: all other medicines out of group A; and group C: oncology and life-saving medicines out of group A) was also performed, and the data were extrapolated for the next 3 years. The Kruskal–Wallis test was applied to establish statistically significant differences between the groups. During 2016–2021, healthcare services and pharmaceutical spending increased permanently, observing a growth of 82 and 80%, respectively. The overall healthcare budget increased from European €1.8 billion to 3.3 billion. The subgroup analysis showed a similar trend for all three groups, with similar growth between them. The highest spending was observed in group C, which outpaced the others mainly due to the particular antineoplastic (chemotherapy) medicines included in it. The rising overall healthcare cost in Bulgaria (from European €1.8 billion to 3.3 billion) reveals that implementation of a mechanism for budget predictability and sustainability is needed. The introduced budget cap is a relatively effective measure, but the high level of overspending and pay-back amount (from European €34 billion to 59 billion during 2019–2021) reveals that the market environmental risk factors are not well foreseen and practically implemented. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9691655/ /pubmed/36438231 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1011928 Text en Copyright © 2022 Mitkova, Dimitrova, Doneva, Tachkov, Kamusheva, Marinov, Gerasimov, Tcharaktchiev and Petrova. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Mitkova, Zornitsa
Dimitrova, Maria
Doneva, Miglena
Tachkov, Konstantin
Kamusheva, Maria
Marinov, Lyubomir
Gerasimov, Nikolay
Tcharaktchiev, Dimitar
Petrova, Guenka
Budget cap and pay-back model to control spending on medicines: A case study of Bulgaria
title Budget cap and pay-back model to control spending on medicines: A case study of Bulgaria
title_full Budget cap and pay-back model to control spending on medicines: A case study of Bulgaria
title_fullStr Budget cap and pay-back model to control spending on medicines: A case study of Bulgaria
title_full_unstemmed Budget cap and pay-back model to control spending on medicines: A case study of Bulgaria
title_short Budget cap and pay-back model to control spending on medicines: A case study of Bulgaria
title_sort budget cap and pay-back model to control spending on medicines: a case study of bulgaria
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9691655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36438231
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1011928
work_keys_str_mv AT mitkovazornitsa budgetcapandpaybackmodeltocontrolspendingonmedicinesacasestudyofbulgaria
AT dimitrovamaria budgetcapandpaybackmodeltocontrolspendingonmedicinesacasestudyofbulgaria
AT donevamiglena budgetcapandpaybackmodeltocontrolspendingonmedicinesacasestudyofbulgaria
AT tachkovkonstantin budgetcapandpaybackmodeltocontrolspendingonmedicinesacasestudyofbulgaria
AT kamushevamaria budgetcapandpaybackmodeltocontrolspendingonmedicinesacasestudyofbulgaria
AT marinovlyubomir budgetcapandpaybackmodeltocontrolspendingonmedicinesacasestudyofbulgaria
AT gerasimovnikolay budgetcapandpaybackmodeltocontrolspendingonmedicinesacasestudyofbulgaria
AT tcharaktchievdimitar budgetcapandpaybackmodeltocontrolspendingonmedicinesacasestudyofbulgaria
AT petrovaguenka budgetcapandpaybackmodeltocontrolspendingonmedicinesacasestudyofbulgaria