Cargando…
Caffeine consumption within British fencing athletes
The ergogenic effects of caffeine are well documented, yet despite the potential benefits of supplementation, there is a lack of understanding of caffeine habits and supplementation within fencing. British fencers (n = 136) completed a Web-based questionnaire, exploring self-reported caffeine consum...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9691662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36438744 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.999847 |
_version_ | 1784837075108888576 |
---|---|
author | Morris, George Bowra Manders, Ralph Johannes Francisca Hulton, Andrew Thomas |
author_facet | Morris, George Bowra Manders, Ralph Johannes Francisca Hulton, Andrew Thomas |
author_sort | Morris, George Bowra |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ergogenic effects of caffeine are well documented, yet despite the potential benefits of supplementation, there is a lack of understanding of caffeine habits and supplementation within fencing. British fencers (n = 136) completed a Web-based questionnaire, exploring self-reported caffeine consumption, reasons for use and education. Fencers (94.1%) habitually consumed caffeine, primarily due to the taste of the products (93.8%). Respondents ingested 183.4 ± 137.5 mg of caffeine daily, with a significant difference between age groups (p < 0.05). Many respondents (30.1%) consumed caffeine 60 mins prior/during fencing training and/or competition with the main reason highlighted as cognitive performance enhancement. Respondents ingested 140.8 ± 104.6 mg of caffeine during training/competition, mainly as energy drinks, bars, and powders. Education on caffeine supplementation was low (25.7%), with significant associations between age groups (p < 0.05). Evidence implies caffeine toxicity has been experienced by 35% of fencers, highlighting the need for education on caffeine consumption. To conclude there is evidence of caffeine supplementation in fencing, primarily to magnify cognitive performance. However, there is a requirement for targeted education on caffeine supplementation to fencers, so that negative side effects and potential anti-doping infringements can be avoided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9691662 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96916622022-11-26 Caffeine consumption within British fencing athletes Morris, George Bowra Manders, Ralph Johannes Francisca Hulton, Andrew Thomas Front Nutr Nutrition The ergogenic effects of caffeine are well documented, yet despite the potential benefits of supplementation, there is a lack of understanding of caffeine habits and supplementation within fencing. British fencers (n = 136) completed a Web-based questionnaire, exploring self-reported caffeine consumption, reasons for use and education. Fencers (94.1%) habitually consumed caffeine, primarily due to the taste of the products (93.8%). Respondents ingested 183.4 ± 137.5 mg of caffeine daily, with a significant difference between age groups (p < 0.05). Many respondents (30.1%) consumed caffeine 60 mins prior/during fencing training and/or competition with the main reason highlighted as cognitive performance enhancement. Respondents ingested 140.8 ± 104.6 mg of caffeine during training/competition, mainly as energy drinks, bars, and powders. Education on caffeine supplementation was low (25.7%), with significant associations between age groups (p < 0.05). Evidence implies caffeine toxicity has been experienced by 35% of fencers, highlighting the need for education on caffeine consumption. To conclude there is evidence of caffeine supplementation in fencing, primarily to magnify cognitive performance. However, there is a requirement for targeted education on caffeine supplementation to fencers, so that negative side effects and potential anti-doping infringements can be avoided. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9691662/ /pubmed/36438744 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.999847 Text en Copyright © 2022 Morris, Manders and Hulton. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Nutrition Morris, George Bowra Manders, Ralph Johannes Francisca Hulton, Andrew Thomas Caffeine consumption within British fencing athletes |
title | Caffeine consumption within British fencing athletes |
title_full | Caffeine consumption within British fencing athletes |
title_fullStr | Caffeine consumption within British fencing athletes |
title_full_unstemmed | Caffeine consumption within British fencing athletes |
title_short | Caffeine consumption within British fencing athletes |
title_sort | caffeine consumption within british fencing athletes |
topic | Nutrition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9691662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36438744 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.999847 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morrisgeorgebowra caffeineconsumptionwithinbritishfencingathletes AT mandersralphjohannesfrancisca caffeineconsumptionwithinbritishfencingathletes AT hultonandrewthomas caffeineconsumptionwithinbritishfencingathletes |