Cargando…

Caffeine consumption within British fencing athletes

The ergogenic effects of caffeine are well documented, yet despite the potential benefits of supplementation, there is a lack of understanding of caffeine habits and supplementation within fencing. British fencers (n = 136) completed a Web-based questionnaire, exploring self-reported caffeine consum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, George Bowra, Manders, Ralph Johannes Francisca, Hulton, Andrew Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9691662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36438744
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.999847
_version_ 1784837075108888576
author Morris, George Bowra
Manders, Ralph Johannes Francisca
Hulton, Andrew Thomas
author_facet Morris, George Bowra
Manders, Ralph Johannes Francisca
Hulton, Andrew Thomas
author_sort Morris, George Bowra
collection PubMed
description The ergogenic effects of caffeine are well documented, yet despite the potential benefits of supplementation, there is a lack of understanding of caffeine habits and supplementation within fencing. British fencers (n = 136) completed a Web-based questionnaire, exploring self-reported caffeine consumption, reasons for use and education. Fencers (94.1%) habitually consumed caffeine, primarily due to the taste of the products (93.8%). Respondents ingested 183.4 ± 137.5 mg of caffeine daily, with a significant difference between age groups (p < 0.05). Many respondents (30.1%) consumed caffeine 60 mins prior/during fencing training and/or competition with the main reason highlighted as cognitive performance enhancement. Respondents ingested 140.8 ± 104.6 mg of caffeine during training/competition, mainly as energy drinks, bars, and powders. Education on caffeine supplementation was low (25.7%), with significant associations between age groups (p < 0.05). Evidence implies caffeine toxicity has been experienced by 35% of fencers, highlighting the need for education on caffeine consumption. To conclude there is evidence of caffeine supplementation in fencing, primarily to magnify cognitive performance. However, there is a requirement for targeted education on caffeine supplementation to fencers, so that negative side effects and potential anti-doping infringements can be avoided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9691662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96916622022-11-26 Caffeine consumption within British fencing athletes Morris, George Bowra Manders, Ralph Johannes Francisca Hulton, Andrew Thomas Front Nutr Nutrition The ergogenic effects of caffeine are well documented, yet despite the potential benefits of supplementation, there is a lack of understanding of caffeine habits and supplementation within fencing. British fencers (n = 136) completed a Web-based questionnaire, exploring self-reported caffeine consumption, reasons for use and education. Fencers (94.1%) habitually consumed caffeine, primarily due to the taste of the products (93.8%). Respondents ingested 183.4 ± 137.5 mg of caffeine daily, with a significant difference between age groups (p < 0.05). Many respondents (30.1%) consumed caffeine 60 mins prior/during fencing training and/or competition with the main reason highlighted as cognitive performance enhancement. Respondents ingested 140.8 ± 104.6 mg of caffeine during training/competition, mainly as energy drinks, bars, and powders. Education on caffeine supplementation was low (25.7%), with significant associations between age groups (p < 0.05). Evidence implies caffeine toxicity has been experienced by 35% of fencers, highlighting the need for education on caffeine consumption. To conclude there is evidence of caffeine supplementation in fencing, primarily to magnify cognitive performance. However, there is a requirement for targeted education on caffeine supplementation to fencers, so that negative side effects and potential anti-doping infringements can be avoided. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9691662/ /pubmed/36438744 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.999847 Text en Copyright © 2022 Morris, Manders and Hulton. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Morris, George Bowra
Manders, Ralph Johannes Francisca
Hulton, Andrew Thomas
Caffeine consumption within British fencing athletes
title Caffeine consumption within British fencing athletes
title_full Caffeine consumption within British fencing athletes
title_fullStr Caffeine consumption within British fencing athletes
title_full_unstemmed Caffeine consumption within British fencing athletes
title_short Caffeine consumption within British fencing athletes
title_sort caffeine consumption within british fencing athletes
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9691662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36438744
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.999847
work_keys_str_mv AT morrisgeorgebowra caffeineconsumptionwithinbritishfencingathletes
AT mandersralphjohannesfrancisca caffeineconsumptionwithinbritishfencingathletes
AT hultonandrewthomas caffeineconsumptionwithinbritishfencingathletes